Model Based Systems Engineering Tool Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Model Based Systems Engineering Tool Review

Description:

Model Based Systems Engineering Tool Review Comparison of Tools Phil Simpkins, Senoir Systems Engineer Philip.simpkins_at_kihomac.com (201) 267-1152 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:840
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: jjo73
Learn more at: https://www.incose.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Model Based Systems Engineering Tool Review


1
Model Based Systems Engineering Tool Review
Comparison of Tools
  • Phil Simpkins, Senoir Systems Engineer
  • Philip.simpkins_at_kihomac.com
  • (201) 267-1152

2
Agenda
  • INCOSE Symposium 2011
  • Introduction to MBSE
  • Compare MBSE Methodologies
  • Systems Engineering
  • Requirements Analysis
  • Behavior Analysis
  • Architecture Synthesis
  • Validation and Verification
  • Documentation

The objectives for this session are to
familiarize the user with key concepts of
Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) and
compare tools
3
INCOSE Chapter Awards
Bronze Circle
4
Where is the Chapter
INCOSE Regions and Chapters
5
Member Resources
  • INCOSE.org
  • On-line renewal
  • SE Products (e.g. Handbook, CSEP, SEBoK)
  • Insight
  • INCOSE Journal
  • INCOSE connect at https//connect.incose.org

6
SE Products
  • INCOSE Handbook (Hard Copy)
  • Systems Engineering Book of Knowledge (SEBoK) -
    Portions can be purchased
  • SE Certification CSEP (885)
  • Measurement Use Guidebook for SE Practitioners
  • Requirements Categorization Guidance
  • Requirements Engineering Guidebook (TBD)
  • Past Symposium Proceedings

7
Working Groups
  • Listed on www.incose.org
  • Requirements
  • Risk Management
  • Complex Systems
  • Model Based Systems Engineering
  • Workshop meeting
  • www.omgwiki.org/MBSE/doku.php
  • Lean Systems Engineering
  • PMI Interfacing

8
Future International Workshop
  • January 21-24, 2012 and 2013
  • Jacksonville, Florida

9
Future Symposia
  • INCOSE 2012 in Rome, Italy  July 09-12, 2012
  • INCOSE 2013 - Philadelphia

10
Board of Directors Change
Board of Directors
Member Board
11
Board of Directors Change
Board of Directors
60
10
30
North American South American Chapters
Asian and Pacific Chapters
European Chapters
8 Chapters
13 Chapters
46 Chapters
12
The Systems Engineers Dilemma Integration and
Synchronization
graph 1
graph text
extracted requirements
graph 2
Printed Reports, Models, Specifications
graph 3
open action items
Data
Source Documents
Data
function list
analyses trade studies
data items
engineering note book
traceability list
interface definitions
physical components
Any change will affect something else
Systems Engineers Desktop
13
The Common SE Tool Suite Architecture
14
The Preferred SE Tool Architecture
Requirements Management
Behavioral Analysis
Architecture Synthesis
Verification
Data
Data
Data
Data
Design Specifications
Source Material
Data
Data
Integrated, consistent analysis complete
specifications, project documentation, queries
and models
15
The Enterprise Team
Program Management
Customer
Configuration Management
Chief Engineer
System Engineer / Architect
Publications
Hardware
Training Personnel
Software
Environmental
Safety
Operations
System Definition Repository
Reliability, Availability, Maintainability
Maintenance
Manufacturability
Logistics
Security
Test
Facilitate domain expert collaboration by
leveraging a common repository
16
Comparison of MBSE Methodologies
  • Telelogic Harmony-SE
  • INCOSE Object-Oriented Systems Engineering Method
    (OOSEM)
  • IBM Rational Unified Process for Systems
    Engineering (RUP SE) for Model-Driven Systems
    Development (MDSD)
  • Vitech - CORE
  • State Analysis (SA) is a JPL-developed MBSE
    methodology

17
Telelogic Harmony-SE
Harmony Integrated Systems and Software
Development Process
18
Telelogic Harmony-SE
Harmony Integrated Systems and Software
Development Process
Harmony-SE Process Elements
19
INCOSE Object-Oriented Systems Engineering Method
(OOSEM)
OOSEM Activities in the Context of the System
Development Process
20
INCOSE Object-Oriented Systems Engineering Method
(OOSEM)
OOSEM Activities and Modeling Artifacts
21
IBM Rational Unified Process for Systems
Engineering (RUP SE)
The RUP SE architecture framework
22
IBM Rational Unified Process for Systems
Engineering (RUP SE)
RUP SE Requirements Allocation/Derivation Method
23
Vitech CORE
Behavior Domain
Source Requirements Domain
Originating requirements trace to behavior
Data
CORESystem Definition Repository
verified by
Behavior is allocated to physical components
Architecture Domain
VV Domain
Data
Data
Data
verified by
verified by
Originating requirements trace to physical
components
Utilizing a layered approach to progressively
clarify and elaborate all four domains
concurrently to ensure consistency and
completeness
24
Vitech CORE
Vitech MBSE "Onion Model"
25
State Analysis (SA)
Model- and State-Based Control Architecture
("Control Diamond")
26
State Analysis (SA)
Integrated Approach to Design for Safety
27
Comparison of MBSE Methodologies
Tool / Methodology Process Framework Functional Analysis Tool Support SysML Simulation Integration
Harmony SE No framework No Third Party Yes Yes Yes Yes, other software available Manually initiated Manually corrected
OOSEM Methodology only No framework COTS Tool applied Yes, Manual, if no tool used No No No No
IBM Rational UP SE Yes, Plug-In available Yes Yes, Plug-In available services recommended Yes, Third party Yes, Plug-In available No
CORE No framework No Third Party DoDAF Schema optional Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes, automatic
State Analysis (SA) No framework No Third Party Yes Yes No No No
28
Tool Comparison at INCOSE 2011
Tool Company Name Req Tool Drawing package Functional Simulation Exchange Data - Doors or other tool
CORE Vitech Yes Yes Yes One way ( upload or download not integrated)
Cradle 3SL Yes Yes Yes One Way
Magic Draw No Magic No Yes only a drawing package No but they intend to build an add-on One Way
Rhapsody IBM Not really Yes Yes Bi-directional but not really integrated
Team Center Unified Siemens Yes Yes Not Yet, but intend to. One way, but really prefer you use their tool
29
Tool Comparison at INCOSE 2011
Tool Company Name Req Tool Drawing package Functional Simulation Exchange Data Doors or other tool
Cognitive Canopy Cognitive? Yes Yes, some No One way
Requim Dissault Yes, but not integrated Maybe No High end Cad Bi-directional not integrated
Arkitect Knowledge Inside No Yes No One way
Windchill PTC No Yes No One way
MD Workbench Sodius Yes Yes Yes Bi directional. Needs manual start and verification
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com