Lab 11 :Test of Neutrality and Evidence for Selection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Lab 11 :Test of Neutrality and Evidence for Selection

Description:

Include only a summary of the Arlequin output in your report (i.e., values of S and , as well as test statistics and p-values for the two neutrality tests). – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: Eli153
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lab 11 :Test of Neutrality and Evidence for Selection


1
Lab 11 Test of Neutrality and Evidence for
Selection
2
  • Goals
  • Calculate the expected number of different
    alleles for a given locus in a population.
  • Detect departure from neutrality using
  • Ewens- Watterson test.
  • Tajimas D test.
  • HKA test and
  • Synonymous and Nonsynonymous nucleotide
    substitution test

3
Infinite Alleles Model (IAM)
  • Each mutation produces a new allele
  • At equilibrium
  • number of alleles constant
  • shape of allele frequency distribution constant
  • frequency of any given allele not constant
  • lost alleles replaced by new mutations

4
Ewens -Watterson test
Expected homozygosity under mutation-drift
equilibrium and assuming IAM
P-value lt 0.025 Too even -gt Balancing selection
or recent bottleneck P-value gt 0.975 Too uneven
-gt Directional selection or population growth
Expected homozygosity under HWE
5
  • Problem 1. Estimates of the long-term effective
    population size of human populations vary widely,
    ranging from as low as 3,000 to as high as
    100,000. To estimate allele frequencies for a
    forensic identification study, you are genotyping
    individuals selected at random from a population
    with an estimated Ne 7,500. You are using one
    allozyme and one microsatellite marker, with
    estimated mutation rates ? 0.7?10-6 and ?
    9.6?10-3, respectively.
  • How many different alleles do you expect to find
    for each marker in a sample of
  • 5 people?
  • 20 people?
  • List assumptions that need to be made for these
    calculations to be valid. Discuss which of these
    assumptions (if any) seem reasonable.

6
Tajimas D
  • Under neutrality, we expect the following
  • Two different ways of estimating the same
    parameter
  • Deviation of these two indicates deviation from
    neutral expectations
  • Assumes neutral alleles and constant population
    size

(Based on number of polymorphic sites)
(Based on nucleotide diversity)
7
Tajimas D test
.
Under neutrality
d ?? - ?S 0
D
8
plantsciences.ucdavis.edu
9
  • Problem 2. File aspen_phy.arp (which is already
    in Arlequin format) contains sequence data from
    exon 1 of the phytochrome B2 (phyB2) gene of 24
    aspen (Populus tremula) trees sampled along a
    wide latitudinal gradient in Europe. Use Arlequin
    to
  • Determine the number of polymorphic sites (S) and
    calculate the nucleotide diversity (?) based on
    these sequences.
  • Perform the tests of neutrality developed by
    Ewens-Watterson and Tajima and interpret the
    results.
  • Provide a statistical and a biological
    interpretation of the results from the two
    neutrality tests. Is selection the only possible
    reason for significant discrepancies between ??
    and ?S?
  • Describe at least one other scenario in which a
    force other than selection would make D
    significantly different from 0.
  • Include only a summary of the Arlequin output in
    your report (i.e., values of S and ?, as well as
    test statistics and p-values for the two
    neutrality tests). Do not include the entire
    output.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com