FAC Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

FAC Update

Description:

Title: FAC Update Author: jrmacier Last modified by: Jolier Created Date: 6/15/2005 4:17:48 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: jrm52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FAC Update


1
FAC Update RFC Status
  • FIMS Workshop
  • June 2-6, 2008

Jolie Macier
2
FIMS Advisory Committee
  • A subcommittee of individuals comprised of Field
    Office users, including DOE contractor
    personnel, that recommend continuous
    improvement to the system.
  •   All FAC recommendations are presented to the
    FDDC for final approval/disapproval. 

3
FIMS Advisory Committee
  • People
  • who are willing to take the
  • Time
  • to be sure FIMS is
  • most useful
  • to the
  • widest possible audience
  • while maintaining the
  • intent of the database

4
Facilities Data Development Committee (FDDC)
  • A corporate board that represents the
    Headquarters program secretarial offices that
    funded the development of FIMS.  FDDC provides
    the guidance and direction of FIMS by making all
    final decisions regarding system policy and
    enhancements. 
  • Dan Sze, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  • Ray Won, Environmental Management
  • Gary Horn, Office of Management
  • Ann Walls, National Nuclear Security
    Administration
  • John Yates, Science

5
(No Transcript)
6
Change Request Process
Requestor completes Change Request Form
Submit RFC to FAC chair
FAC Action via monthly conference calls
FDDC Action
Implementation
7
Change Request Summary
8
Change Request Highlights
  • 15 requests
  • Data elements added
  • Data elements removed
  • Definition changes

9
RFC Status Implemented
  • 07-08 Add data element Lease Authority
    Indicator
  • FRPC requirement
  • 07-10 Remove Design Use data element
  • FRPC requirement
  • 07-11 Modify Energy Consuming fields
  • EO 13423

10
RFC Status FAC Approved
  • 07-07 Nuclear Facility Maintenance
  • DOE O 433.1A
  • 07-09 Status Utilization ? Utilization
  • To match FRPC intent

11
Utilization A New Definition
  • The ratio of occupancy to design capacity based
    on the current usage code, expressed as a
    percentage.
  • Note that utilization is independent of status
    and must be reported for all status designations.
    Facilities that are fully shutdown will generally
    have a utilization of zero. However, because the
    reported Status is the predominate status, a
    facility that is 51 percent shutdown and 49
    percent operating would be properly be reported
    as Shutdown but the Utilization would be 49
    percent (if the operating portion is fully
    utilized).

12
Utilization A New Definition
  • The ratio of occupancy to design capacity based
    on the current usage code, expressed as a
    percentage.
  • Note also that utilization is not a reflection of
    space assignment but rather a measure of how
    full the space is. As an example, if a building
    with four floors is fully assigned to an
    organization but one floor is empty with the
    other three floors fully utilized, the
    utilization would be 75 percent.
  • For programmatic facilities such as laboratories
    or accelerators, the utilization can be
    considered to be 100 percent if the mission
    requires 100 percent of the facility, even though
    there may be times when the facility is not fully
    utilized, or even unutilized.

13
Utilization FAC Approved Caveats
  • Non-programmatic facilities with intermittent use
  • For property that is required to support the
    mission but whose use might be irregular or
    periodic, the utilization can be considered to be
    100 percent if the mission requires 100 percent
    of the facility. These special use properties
    may experience periods of down time, yet continue
    to be considered 100 percent utilized.
  • Occupancy does not necessarily mean people
    change to
  • The ratio of actual usage to design capacity
    based on the current usage code, expressed as a
    percentage.
  • or add a note
  • Occupancy refers to the use capacity and does
    not have particular relevance to human
    occupants.

14
Utilization FAC Approved Caveats
  • Asset Utilization Index (AUI) calculation impact
    (references RPAM, the Jul 28, 2004, Rispoli
    memo, Guidance Asset Utilization Guidance,
    the FIMS Data Element Dictionary, dated 04/24/07,
    and FIMS Reports such as 082 and 093)
  • Optimum use notion is not addressed
    (references 41 CFR Chapter 102, 102-75.40
    through 102-75.55 and the 2004 Rispoli memo)
  • The FAC acknowledges that the definition allows
    discretion with respect to the calculation
    method, as suggested by the FRPC.

15
RFC Status FAC Approved
  • 08-01 NNSA Transformation Activities
  • Funding Source
  • FY Priority Score
  • FY Priority Rank
  • Total Estimated Cost Disposition
  • Excess Deferred Maintenance Reduction
  • Excess Yearly SM Costs
  • Candidate for Transfer
  • Contaminated
  • 08-04 Remove Summary/Detail Indicator

16
RFC Status FAC Not Approved
  • 08-02 New Usage Code Training Venue
  • 08-05 Add Costworks indicator to RPV flag
  • 08-03 New usage code for Greenhouse

17
RFC Status RFC 08-03
18
RFC Status FAC Not Approved
  • 08-07 NNSA Enduring field
  • Facilities and infrastructure that are projected
    to remain operational beyond the planning period
    FY2018
  • 08-08 NNSA Transformation fields for new
    construction
  • Add selection choices to Building Status
  • Project Number
  • Construction Funding Type
  • Planned Year Occupancy
  • Planned Year Acquired
  • Total Project Cost

19
RFC Status Withdrawn
  • 07-12 1-click report for SC TYSP
  • 07-13 RPV model for small buildings
  • lt 500 sqft
  • Metal framed
  • Prefabricated
  • On a concrete slab or raised foundation, with or
    without utilities
  • Used to protect equipment or house mission
    critical communication devices

20
RFC Status RFC 07-13
21
Change Request Status
22
Special Thanks
  • Mark Gordy
  • Gayle Smith

23
Membership
  • Jolie Macier, Fermilab, Chairperson
  • Carol Booth, SPRO
  • Sharon Campbell, Savannah River
  • Roger Johnson, ORISE
  • Jane Nations, Y-12
  • Laura Troche, Chicago Service Center
  • Jerome Williams, SPRO

24
Thanks
  • Carol Booth
  • Sharon Campbell
  • Laura Troche
  • Jerome Williams

25
Membership Responsibilities
  • Represent FIMS community interests
  • 2-year term
  • Monthly conference call
  • Minutes preparation distribution

26
  • Questions?

Thank You!
Volunteers?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com