Peer Editing Guidelines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Peer Editing Guidelines

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: Sally Shelton Last modified by: mmankins Created Date: 11/11/2005 5:14:54 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Sally185
Learn more at: http://web.oru.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Peer Editing Guidelines


1
Peer Editing Guidelines
  • The Art of Giving and Receiving Constructive
    Criticism
  • Courtesy of Mrs. Sally Shelton

2
Peer-editing Dos
  • Do use constructive criticism Let all things be
    done unto edifying (1 Cor 1426).
  • Do adopt a trust stance avoid self-defensiveness,
    assume the best of others motives lovealways
    trusts (1 Cor 137, NIV)

Edify or buildup to promote the health,
strength, esteem, or reputation of
Trust believing in the honesty and reliability
of others
3
Peer-editing Dos
  •   Do listen. Pay attention to what the other
    writer is saying, just as you hope the other
    person will pay attention to what you are saying.
  • Do look at content above everything else.

4
Peer-editing Donts
  • Dont apologize! Remember that all drafts are
    works in progress, and therefore you do not need
    to apologize for anything written in a draft.
  • Don't argue about ideas expressed within the
    paper. Your role is not to agree or disagree, but
    to help that writer express the ideas clearly and
    effectively.
  • Don't waste time on surface errors in parts of
    the draft that may ultimately be cut--try to
    always look at the overall effectiveness of the
    essay.

http//www.colby.edu/writers.center/tips/peerediti
ng.html
5
Advantages of Peer Editing
  • Student-centered rather than instructor-centered
  • Helps overcome writers block
  • Motivates the writer to focus on communicating
    effectively to ones
  • peers
  • Encourages rewriting
  • Encourages writer to exercise critical
  • self-evaluation

6
Another Advantage
  • Relieves a kind of stress known as writers
    anxiety

Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfill
the law of Christ (Gal 62).
Dont worry! This is apple juice!
7
Stages of Writing
  • Prewriting (Preparing to write)
  • Drafting (Putting thoughts on paper)
  • Revision (Taking another look)
  • Final proofreading
  • Publication (Final draft)

8
Prewriting(Preparing to write)
  • Read, think, free-write in a journal format
  • Identify purpose and audience
  • Research, take notes, gather information
  • Brainstorm with a peer group
  • Organize thinking and plan

9
Drafting (Putting thoughts on paper)
  • Focus on content (quantity and quality to be
    considered later)
  • Compose freely, without concern for mechanics

10
Revising (Taking another look)
  • Maintain focus on content vs. mechanics
  • Share draft with peer group
  • Invite discussion, accept response and helpful
    input from peers
  • Add to, delete from, rearrange, and revise first
    draft

11
Editing/Proofreading
  • Share revised draft with peer group
  • Invite correction of grammar, spelling,
    punctuation, usage
  • Incorporate corrections in final draft

12
Publication(The final draft)
  • Share the product with peer group
    (dramatizations, small group reports, oral
    presentations, etc.)
  • Invite evaluation by peer group, family and
    friends, colleagues
  • Submit for final evaluation by teacher

13
Peer Editing Instructions Phase 1
  • Begin with the big picture. Read through the
    paper for comprehension. (Ignore mechanics at
    this point.)
  • Does the introduction grab your attention? Does
    it explain why the topic is significant?
  • Are you able to identify the thesis statement? Is
    the rest of the paper closely tied to the thesis?
  • Is the paper clearly organized?
  • Is the body of the paper presented logically?
  • Does the author show evidence of doing adequate
    research?
  • Does the author interact well with his/her
    sources? Are the sources referenced?
  • Does the author maintain a scholarly tone
    throughout?
  • Does the conclusion re-state the thesis in a
    fresh way?
  • Does the author make an application of his/her
    thesis?

14
Peer Editing Instructions Phase II
  • Now consider the mechanics.
  • Is the format of the footnotes correct?
  • Is the word choice precise and succinct?
  • Does the paper flow well? Does the author use
    transitions to connect sentences and paragraphs?
  • Do the sentences reflect correct grammar?
    Consider tense, noun/pronoun agreement,
    subject/verb agreement, avoidance of fragments
    and run-ons.
  • Consider punctuation, capitalization, and
    spelling.
  • Consider paper format font, spacing, pagination,
    margins.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com