ECON3315 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ECON3315

Description:

ECON3315 International Economic Issues Instructor: Patrick M. Crowley Issue 3: Trade sanctions and human rights – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: HPAuthor577
Category:
Tags: econ3315 | libya | russia

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ECON3315


1
ECON3315 International Economic Issues
  • Instructor Patrick M. Crowley

Issue 3 Trade sanctions and human rights
2
Overview
  • Sanctions - background
  • US sanctions
  • Success of sanctions
  • Sanctions as a counter to terrorism
  • Trade and human rights
  • China and the WTO a case study

3
Sanctions - background
  • Trade sanctions on countries have a long history
  • First trade sanctions imposed in 432BC by Athens
    against Megara
  • US first imposed trade sanctions against Europe
    in 1807
  • Japan in 1938 (led to attack on Pearl Harbor)
  • South Africa during the apartheid era, many
    developed countries imposed trade sanctions (UK,
    US, Europe)
  • Soviet Union (US, Europe) during cold war
  • Nicaragua (US) during sandinasta rule
  • Uganda during Idi Amins rule (UK)
  • Libya under Colonel Gaddafi (UK/US)
  • Cuba under Fidel Castro (US)
  • Rhodesia under Ian Smith (UK)
  • Zimbabwe under Robert Mugabe (UK)
  • Afghanistan under Taliban (US, UK)
  • Post-9/11 US sanctions against axis of evil
    states
  • Most recently against Syrian regime

4
US sanctions
  • US sanctions can comprise the following
  • Ban on sensitive technology exports
  • Ban on export of weapons
  • Ban on foreign assistance (granting credit,
    loans, aid)
  • Ban on financial transactions with sanctioned
    governments
  • Ban on firms doing any business with country
  • Since 9/11 add to this
  • Freezing of assets held in the US and abroad
  • 3rd party measures if assets not frozen then
    sanctions on these countries too
  • Foreign Terrorist Asset Tracking Center in US
    Treasury
  • Under Bush administration axis of evil Cuba,
    Iran, Libya, North Korea, Sudan, Syria. What
    changes have taken place?
  • Current US sanctions Belarus, Burma, CAR, Cote
    DIvoire, Cuba, DRC, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya,
    N Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Russia,
    Venezuela, Yemen, Zimbabwe.

5
Success of sanctions
Pre-1973 Pre-1973 1973-84 1973-84
Policy goal Successes Failures Successes Failures
Modest policy changes 9 3 9 23
Destabilization 9 6 1 3
Disruption of military adventures 5 8 1 4
Military impairment 2 6 0 2
Other policy changes 2 11 1 3
TOTAL 27 34 12 35
Record shows that even under fairly modest goals,
more failures than successes Also record shows
that the failure rate of trade sanctions has been
increasing
Source Bruce Bartlett, Cato Institute, 1985
6
Success of sanctions
Source Hufbauer and Oegg, 2003 International
Economics Policy Brief, IIE.
7
What is the effect of sanctions on trade?
From previous slide, total US trade lost is
estimated in 1999 to have been 11.5bn Evidence
is that trade sanctions are effective in reducing
trade to sanctioned countries. But often effect
is to make country more self-sufficient, with
negative impacts on sanctioned country citizens
and on US firms
Scope of sanctions imposed All countries, exports plus imports OECD countries, exports only United States, exports only
Limited -15-20 -21.5 -15-20
Moderate -31.2 -31.1 -68.0
Extensive -91.9 -78.0 -96.8
Source Kimberly Elliott, evidence given to House
Subcommittee on Trade, 1997.
8
What is the effect of sanctions on trade?
  • Hufbauer and Oegg (2003) find that
  • Limited or moderate sanctions increase trade
  • Effectiveness of sanctions has decreased slightly
    from 1995-1999
  • No after-effect once sanctions have been lifted
  • They account for problems with gravity model and
    estimate 25bn reduction in trade
  • Note that this does not include services

9
International agreements on trade sanctions
  • Export controls have been put in place by 40
    countries for conventional arms and dual use
    goods and technologies
  • Called the Wassenaar Arrangement and signed in
    1995 in the Netherlands
  • Missile Systems Control Regime established 1985
  • Also Australia group limits exports of goods
    that could be used to make chemical and
    biological weapons
  • Apart from this, little coordination of trade
    sanctions except through the UN Security Council
  • UN sanctions are currently in place against (Sept
    2013)
  • Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea,
    Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Zimbabwe.
  • For example, Canada currently has trade sanctions
    against
  • Burma, Belarus, Cote dIvoire, DR of the Congo,
    Eritrea, Guinea-Bissau, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon,
    Libya, Liberia, North Korea, Sierra Leone,
    Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia and Egypt, Zimbabwe

10
Sanctions as a counter to terrorism
  • Post 9-11 measures are appropriate in broad US
    policy context, but some skepticism of success is
    in order as
  • History of sanctions against state sponsors of
    terrorism shows little success
  • Pre-existing sanctions were not successful
    against terrorist-supporting states (e.g.
    Afghanistan)
  • War against South American drug lords in 80s not
    a success either (lt1 of total assets estimated
    as captured)
  • Many of the terrorist assets are not in
    conventional assets

11
Trade and human rights
  • Multilateral agreement on investment was
    negotiated by OECD countries in 1995 this made
    many activists scared about reach of
    multinational enterprises (MNEs)
  • View was that by protecting MNE investments, this
    could harm governments right to act to protect
    labor
  • Large anti-free trade lobby against the WTO at
    its meetings ( - with riots in Seattle)
  • WTO Human Rights Caucus established in 2003 to
    monitor human rights in WTO members (Canada
    heavily involved)
  • Q If membership of WTO granted, will greater
    human rights follow? Or should HR be a condition
    of membership?

12
Recent research
13
China and the WTO a case study
  • Particular concern over Russia and Chinas
    entrance into the WTO
  • China first applied to join GATT in 1986
    eventually joined WTO in 2001
  • WTO agreement specifies respect for property
    rights, legal rights and patent protection and
    also specifies that legal systems must be in
    place
  • But barely any mention of human rights in any WTO
    agreements
  • Result general disagreement between US and China
    over state of human rights.
  • Continuing problems which have now spilled over
    to the private sector with (for example) Google.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com