EQUALITY RIGHTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

EQUALITY RIGHTS

Description:

equality rights a canadian perspective ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:218
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: bill426
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EQUALITY RIGHTS


1
EQUALITY RIGHTS
  • A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE

2
ADOPTION IN CHARTER
  • MADE PART OF CHARTER
  • MUCH LOBBYING ABOUT WORDING BECAUSE OF EARLIER
    NARROW PRECEEDENTS
  • NGOs HAD SIGNIFICANT INFLUENCE ON WORDING

3
SECTION 15 WORDING
  • (1) Every individual is equal before and under
    the law and has the right to the equal protection
    and benefit of the law without discrimination
    and, in particular, without discrimination based
    on race, national or ethnic origin, colour,
    religion, sex, age or mental or physical
    disability.

4
Section 15 wording continued
  • (2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law,
    program or activity that has as its object the
    amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged
    individuals or groups including those that are
    disadvantged because of race, national or ethnic
    origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or
    physical disability.

5
Relation of s. 15 to anti-discrimination
legislation
  • Section 15 covers only conduct of government, not
    private sector.
  • But it covers all governmental activity, not just
    employment, housing and services.

6
How Should We Measure What is Equality?
  • Examples for discussion
  • Only men allowed to vote in elections
  • All students given three hours to complete
    examination.
  • Law school fees 300 higher than arts faculty
    fees.
  • Segregated classes for people with disabilities.

7
Lessons from these examples
  • What is absolute equality from one point of view
    may be absolute inequality from another point of
    view.
  • Problem goes beyond where to draw the line.

8
Aristotles definition
  • Equality consists of treating equals equally and
    unequals unequally in proportion to the
    inequality.
  • Problems with this definition.
  • How do we decide who is equal? What criteria do
    we use?
  • How do we decide whether they are being treated
    equally?

9
How to formulate an appropriate definition
  • Definition is a policy choice, not just a
    question of applying proper logic.
  • Choices may be different for different societies
    depending on what issues of inequality are most
    important in that society.
  • Consider what are most important issues in Taiwan.

10
Wording of section 15 of the Canadian Charter
  • Individual excludes corporations
  • Why all the different formulations (before,
    under, protection, benefit)
  • Section 15(2), exception or indication how to
    measure equality?

11
First Charter case
  • Claimed equality violated because only citizens
    could become lawyers and it took 5 years to gain
    citizenship.
  • What are the arguments for and against this claim?

12
Enumerated or analogous grounds
  • What should count as analogous?
  • Marital status?
  • Sexual orientation?
  • Where you live in Canada?
  • What should be the test of what is analogous?

13
Courts answer to this question
  • Unchangeable or changeable only at undue cost.
  • Should not have to change characteristics that
    are essential part of ones identity.

14
What counts as discrimination
  • Medical services do not cover interpreters for
    people who are deaf and cannot communicate with
    doctors in the usual way.
  • Anti-discrimination statute covers grounds such
    as race and sex but not sexual orientation.

15
What counts as discrimination, continued
  • Welding training program only for women.
  • Government pension plan if spouse dies. Benefits
    reduced if you are younger.
  • There are female prison guards in male prisons
    but no male guards in female prisons.

16
How Canadian courts measure what is discriminatory
  • Focus on results or outcomes
  • Consider outcomes in relation to broader social
    context.
  • Consider longer-range outcomes, not just
    immediate ones

17
Summary of Canadian approach
  • Inequality need not be intentional
  • Test not identical treatment but equality of
    results.
  • Measure results against broader social context
  • Does outcome narrow the gap between disadvantaged
    and advantaged groups..

18
Significance of Section 15(2)
  • Could view as exception to equality rights.
  • But courts have treated as indication of how to
    measure equality.

19
Overall Summary
  • Equality is a fundamental principle.
  • But how to measure equality involves policy
    choices.
  • Each society must consider its own situation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com