IS ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY THE ANSWER TO INFERTILITY IN THE AGING OVARY ? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

IS ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY THE ANSWER TO INFERTILITY IN THE AGING OVARY ?

Description:

? ' , – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:175
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: telh150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IS ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY THE ANSWER TO INFERTILITY IN THE AGING OVARY ?


1
??? ?? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ??????
  • ????' ????? ??????
  • ??? ???? ???????,
  • ???? ????? ????, ??-?????

2
How do improve our pregnancy rates?
  • Clexane is directly or indirectly
    involved in adhesion of the
    blastocyst to the endometrium and the
    subsequent invasion (?!)

3
How can clexane help with so many genetically
abnormal embryos?
normal chromosomal status (46,XX)
abnormal chromosomal status (45,XY,-12)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Association of common thrombophilias and
antiphospholipid antibodies with success rate of
in vitro fertilisation.
  • None of the common thrombophilias tested was
    found to be significantly associated with the
    number of IVF cycles or with lower fertility
    success rate.

7
Association of common thrombophilias and
antiphospholipid antibodies with success rate of
in vitro fertilisation.
  • Women who had APCR and /or factor V Leiden and
    lupus anticoagulant had significantly higher live
    birth rates (12.3 and 12.6, respectively) in
    comparison to women who were tested negative
    (9.0 and 9.7, respectively).

8
Association of common thrombophilias and
antiphospholipid antibodies with success rate of
in vitro fertilisation.
  • Hypercoagulability is not associated with failure
    to achieve pregnancy.
  • These data suggest that neither screening for
    thrombophilia nor anticoagulant treatment is
    indicated in cases with unexplained reproductive
    failure.

9
" In GOD we trust all others must bring
data. - W. Edwards Deming
10
The Evidence Pyramid
11
GiGo Garbage in Garbage out principle
12
Meta-analysis Cooking PotAll depends on the
quality of the ingredients
13
??? ?????? ?? ??? ?????
14
??? ?????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ??????
?? ??? ?????
15
A meta-analysis is like a sausage, only God and
the butcher knows what goes in it, neither would
ever eat any.
16
(No Transcript)
17
Conclusions and Relevance
  •   Estimation of treatment outcomes in
    meta-analyses differs depending on the strategy
    used.
  • This instability in findings can result in
    major alterations in the conclusions derived
    from the analysis and underlines the need for
    systematic sensitivity analyses.

18
Caution !
  • Despite the lack of evidence-based information,
    empirical low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is
    widely used in recurrent implantation failures.
  •  
  • Bulent Berker, M.D.
  • Salih Taskin, M.D.
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical
    School,
  • Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

19
(No Transcript)
20
Conclusions
  • In women with 3 RIF, the use of adjunct LMWH
    significantly improves LBR by 79 compared with
    the control group.

21
  • "There are three kinds of lies lies, damned
    lies and statistics. - Benjamin DIsraeli
  • (1804-1881)

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Live birth rate (LBR) in women with 3 recurrent
implantation failure and LMWH as treatment adjunct
?
25
2013 Impact Factor 1.018
26
Risk of bias summary review authors
judgments about each risk of bias item for each
included study.
27
Live birth rate of 2.4?!
3 consecutive failed IVF cycle, Age lt35 years
with at least one coagulation defect
28
Implantation rate (IR) in women with 3 recurrent
implantation failure and LMWH as treatment adjunct
IR was not significantly improved !
29
Shortcomings in the study by Qublan et al., 2008
  • Included women with both inherited and acquired
    thrombophilia.
  • Acquired thrombophilia like APA are associated
    with recurrent miscarriage and possibly RIF
    compared with certain heterozygous inherited
    thrombophilia.
  • In this study, a third of the patients were
    carriers of MTHFR C677T polymorphism, and there
    is no conclusive evidence in the literature
    regarding the adverse effect of this
    heterogeneous mutation on IVF or pregnancy
    outcomes

30
Shortcomings in the study by Qublan et al., 2008
  • A single test with low positivity cut-off was
    used in this study to check for lupus
    anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies, yet
    for diagnosis of acquired thrombophilia these
    antibodies should be confirmed by a repeat test
    12 weeks apart (Miyakis et al., 2006).
  • These observations indicate that the study
    population was heterogenous and that the women
    did not necessarily have thrombophilia which is
    associated with adverse IVF or pregnancy
    outcomes.

31
Conclusions
  • In women with 3 RIF, the use of adjunct LMWH
    significantly improves LBR by 79 compared with
    the control group
  • however, this is to be considered with caution,
    since the overall number of participants in the
    studies was small.
  • Further evidence from adequately powered
    multi-centered RCTs is required prior to
    recommending LMWH for routine clinical use.
  • This review highlights the need for future basic
    science and clinical research in this important
    field.

32
Live birth rate(LBR) in women with 3 unexplained
recurrent implantation failure and LMWH as
treatment adjunct
It is important to note that these beneficial
effects of LMWH were not significant when only
the two studies with unexplained RIF were pooled.
33
(No Transcript)
34
Flow chart of the study
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
Conclusion
  • The data in this study show that low-dose aspirin
    and/or heparin as adjuvant therapies during IVF
    do not improve live birth rates in an unselected
    group of subfertile women who have previously had
    one or more unexplained implantation failure
    following IVF.

38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
Results
Control group LMWH group
33.9 34.6 Clinical pregnancy rate
29.1 30.7 Live birth rate
21.1 22.6 Implantation rate
42.8 41.6 Multiple pregnancy rate
No statistically significant difference
41
Conclusion
  • No beneficial effect of LMWH on pregnancy
    outcomes in patients with two or more
    implantation failures and without coagulation
    disorders.
  • Use of LMWH should be limited to research
    purposes until its beneficial effects have been
    proved by studies

42
Clexane Hemorrhagic Side effects
  • Occur in 3 to 7 of patients.
  • A meta-analysis of published studies reported an
    overall incidence of major bleeding with low
    molecular weight heparins of 0.7 to 1.4.
  • Hemorrhage may occur at any site in the body.

43
Clexane Side effects
  • Hematologic side effects including
  • wound hematoma (11)
  • anemia (3)
  • ecchymosis (3)
  • thrombocytopenia (1.5)
  • Local side effects have included
  • pain
  • erythema
  • ecchymosis
  • hematoma

44
Clexane Side effects
  • Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an
    immune-mediated, prothrombotic reaction that
    occurs in less than 1 of patients treated with a
    low molecular weight heparin (LMWH).

45
My lovely clexane bruises!
46
Clexane Pain!!!
47
????
  • ????? 60 ?"?, 2 ??????, 70.76 ???.
  • ???? ????? ???? 1,061 ??? ?????

48
(No Transcript)
49
(No Transcript)
50
Cochrane Conclusion
  • The results of this Cochrane review of three
    randomised controlled trials with a total of 386
    women suggested that peri-implantation LMWH in
    assisted reproduction treatment (ART) cycles may
    improve the live birth rate in women undergoing
    assisted reproduction.

51
Cochrane Conclusion
  • However, these results were dependent on small
    low quality studies with substantial
    heterogeneity, and were sensitive to the choice
    of statistical model.
  • There were side effects reported with use of
    heparin, including bruising and bleeding, and no
    reliable data on long-term effects.

52
Cochrane Conclusion
  • Overall, this evidence does not justify the
    present widespread use of LMWH in this population
    subgroup (previous failed IVF), outside
    well-conducted randomised trials. Such trials
    should be a priority.

53
  • Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com