H. Igor Ansoff - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

H. Igor Ansoff

Description:

H. Igor Ansoff Father of Strategic Management Who influenced this person? F. W. Taylor Elton Mayo Henri Fayol Henry Mintzberg Early Life Born in Vladivostok, Russia ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:171
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: ValuedGa621
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: H. Igor Ansoff


1
H. Igor AnsoffFather of Strategic Management
2
If you can see things that are out of whack, you
can also see how things can be in whack. Dr.
Seuss, The Problem
3
Who influenced this person?
  • F. W. Taylor
  • Elton Mayo
  • Henri Fayol
  • Henry Mintzberg

4
Early Life
  • Born in Vladivostok, Russia in December of 1918
  • His father was American
  • His mother a Russian
  • He lived in Russia until 1936 when his family
    moved to New York

5
Early American Life
  • Convinced that Americas capitalistic system was
    corrupt
  • Department stores with more products than he
    could dream of dispeled the propaganda-induced
    myths.

6
Education
  • He mastered English and valedictorian of New
    Yorks prestigious Stuyvesant High School
  • He completed his ME and MS with honors at Stevens
    Institute of Technology in New Jersey
  • He completed his Ph.D. at Brown University
  • Holds at least 4 Honorary Doctorates
  • Stockholm School of Economics
  • University of Bath and Helsinki School of
    Economics

7
Early Work Life
  • In 1948, Ansoff joined the Rand Corporation
  • In 1957, He began work for Lockheed Aircraft
    Corporation
  • Vice President of Planning and Programs at
    Lockheed Electronics
  • Developed a number of management concepts related
    to strategic analysis and planning

8
Academic Life
  • Professor of Industrial Administration at
    Carnegie-Mellon University
  • Vanderbuilt University
  • Founding dean of the Graduate School of
    Management
  • Helped the school establish the niche of the
    management of change
  • European Institute of Advanced Studies in
    Management
  • Stockholm University
  • United States International University in San
    Diego

9
Publications
  • Prolific writer
  • 11 Books
  • Over 120 articles
  • Several were reproduced in more than 15 languages

10
Corporate Strategy (1965)
  • A model for Strategic Decision
  • The solution of any decision problem in business,
    science, or art can be viewed in four steps.
  • Perception of decision need or opportunity.
  • Formulation of alternative courses of action.
  • Evaluation of the alternatives for their
    respective contributions.
  • Choice of one or more alternatives for
    implementation.

11
Applied to Marketing
  • 1957 Harvard Business Review

12
The New Corporate Strategy
13
Key Hypothesis of Stategic Management
  1. Contingency Hypothesis
  2. Environmental Dependence Hypothesis
  3. Requisite Variety Hypothesis
  4. Strategy Capability Performance Hypothesis
  5. Multicomponent Capability Hypothesis
  6. Balanced Capability Hypothesis

14
What is the Difference Between Strategic Planning
and Strategic Management
  • Strategic planning is focused on optimal strategy
    decisions
  • Stategic management is focused on producing
    strategic results
  • New markets
  • New products
  • New technologies

15
What is the Difference Between Strategic Planning
and Strategic Management
  • Strategic planning is an analytical process
  • Stategic management is an organizational action
    process

16
What is the Difference Between Strategic Planning
and Strategic Management
  • Strategic planning is focused on business,
    economic and technology variables
  • Stategic management broadens the focus to include
  • Psychological
  • Sociological
  • Political
  • Thus, strategic planning is about choosing things
    to do, while strategic management is about
    choosing things to do and also about the people
    who will do them.

17
What is the Difference Between Strategic Planning
and Strategic Management
  • Strategic management consists of
  • Formulating strategies
  • Designing the firms capability
  • Managing implementation of strategies and
    capabilities

18
Lasting Impact
  • Early 70s he moved from a concept of strategic
    planning
  • He realized that making sound plans was not
    enough to ensure strategic success.
  • Coined the term strategic management, emphasizing
    a broader approach including
  • Individual and group behavior dynamics
  • Political processes
  • Organizational culture
  • Coined the term synergy
  • One internally generated by a combination of
    capabilities or competencies

19
Lasting Impact
  • Ansoff Institue was established in co-operation
    with the US International University, San Diego
  • Vision is to be a leading research institute
  • Purpose is to transfer theoretical strategic
    research to practical applications.
  • Continuing Igors work
  • Develop into many new and unanticipated
    directions
  • Multinational in Scope
  • Two annual Ansoff Awards
  • Holland
  • Japan

20
Critisisms
  • Himself
  • Noel Capon, John U. Farley and James M. Hulbert
    in Corporate Strategic Planning
  • Henry Mintzberg
  • In 1984, Business Week was quoted as After more
    than a decade of near-dictatorial sway over the
    future of U.S. corporations, the reign of the
    strategic planner may be at an end

21
'Twas the Night Before Christmas orStrategy in a
Nutshell By Dr. Richar Z. Gooding 'Twas the
night before Christmas and all through the
office,          not an employee was stirring,
not even the bosses. The last orders were
shipped by FedEx that day,          in hopes
that big profits would soon come their way. The
work had been planned to the final
detail.          Management was confident that
nothing would fail. They'd examined their
strengths and knew how they compared.          Th
e goal was in sight. The team was prepared.
Market research had clearly shown them the
way.          Sound strategy would keep them
from going astray. Team work was more than a
word to avow.          Everyone had a say in
who, what and how. Competitors reacted the way
that they do,          defending their turf and
denying the truth. The team's product was
superior, the service first-rate.          One
wonders why competitors responded so late. The
customers were savvy, they knew what they
wanted.          The team had delivered. Their
praise went undaunted. Financial results proved
the merit of their vision.          Revenues
soared. They'd accomplished their mission.
Shareholders cheered at the next annual
meeting.          The room was so packed there
was no extra seating. When asked to explain how
it had all been done,          the President
exclaimed, "We all worked as one."
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com