GOVERNANCE ISSUES IN SWM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

GOVERNANCE ISSUES IN SWM

Description:

GOVERNANCE ISSUES IN SWM Almitra H Patel Member, Supreme Court Committee for Solid Waste Management in Class 1 Cities in India almitrapatel_at_rediffmail.com – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Hosh152
Category:
Tags: governance | issues | nasik | swm

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GOVERNANCE ISSUES IN SWM


1
GOVERNANCE ISSUES IN SWM
  • Almitra H Patel
  • Member, Supreme Court Committee for Solid Waste
    Management in
  • Class 1 Cities in India
  • almitrapatel_at_rediffmail.com
  • www.almitrapatel.com

2
CORRUPTION IS THE BIGGEST PROBLEM IN SWM
  • Doable low-cost technologies are ignored in
    favour of costliest options, in choice of both
    equipment and processing options.
  • Buffer Zone is a statutory must around
    waste-processing and disposal sites. It is often
    not declared or arbitrarily reduced, to help land
    speculators to buy cheap, force closure of site
    and sell at inflated value.
  • Compensate farmers falling in Buffer Zones.

3
STRICT MONITORING OF WASTE - MANAGEMENT SITES
IS A MUST
  • Compost plants awarded to private parties are not
    monitored, often on purpose.
  • City pays them (and someone shares?) Tipping
    Fees to allow open-dumping waste transported by
    ULB to ULBs own land given on long lease at
    trivial cost.
  • Tipping fees abroad are for return on massive
    capital investment in private land

4
OPEN DUMPING OF MIXED WASTE INTO QUARRIES IS
DISASTROUS
  • Leachate formed in anaerobic waste enters
    ground-water under pressure of 40ft head and
    cannot be captured for treated in unlined
    quarry-pits.
  • That is why EU now bans all below-ground
    landfills and allows only land-hills where
    leachate will flow out at ground level for
    observation and capture.
  • Fill quarries with debris first, then can manage
    waste-stabilising above it later.

5
BIOREACTOR LANDFILLS ARE AGAINST MSW RULES
  • Only inert waste and pre- post- composting
    rejects are allowed in landfills. Indias first
    attempt at it is now an open dump in a lined hole
    because of admin problems.
  • Soil cover on open-dumped waste makes both
    unusable and un-recoverable, besides destroying a
    hill or field somewhere. Bio-mining will be
    useless with soil mixed in organic fraction after
    sieving.

6
EXISTING OPEN DUMPS MUST BE IMPROVED AND
REMEDIATED
  • Abandoning existing sites is not an option, it
    favours land-speculators.
  • Bio-mining is the best option. It removes all
  • material down to near-ground-level, leaving
  • 15 rejects no methane-generating waste.
  • At Gorai, 1 hectare of 12 meter height was
  • cleared in 4 months for Rs 10 lacs, recovering
  • land worth Rs 600/sft or Rs 28 crores/hectare

7
BIOMINING OPTIONS
  • Loosen top 6 of waste with cultivator,hand-
  • pick out large wastes, heap into windrows.
  • Add biocultures or old compost and turn as
  • for fresh waste. Sieve out organic fraction.
  • Malegaons Balwan garbage sorter leaves
  • almost no waste behind gives clean plastics,
  • clean fine organics, clean sand / gravel.
  • Can start work at many points around dump.

8
DONT CAP UNLINED OPEN DUMPS
  • Landfill gases seep out from sides with
  • disastrous results on health of electronics
  • nearby residents, as seen at Mindspace
  • Complex at Malad, Mumbai.
  • Methane capture is max 55 even in best
  • lined landfills. Plateau above 30o slope is only
  • 1/3 rd area of base which biomining can give.
  • Indian bio-mining needs carbon-credit recog-
  • nition like forced air landfill mining.

9
MUNICIPAL WASTE TO POWER IS A SCAM
  • Thermodynamically unviable on low-calorie
  • Indian waste,so burn technology disapproved
  • by SAARC. 2 plants secretly used paddy-husk
  • or ground-nut hulls. 33 non-starter MoUs.
  • Biometh is okay. Even large-scale conversion
  • of hotel waste to CBG Compressed BioGas at
  • 10 below LPG is now viable with subsidy cap
  • Biometh good for slaughter-wastes too.

10
USE BIOGAS FOR HEAT, NOT POWER
  • 75 energy is lost if heat energy is used to make
    steam to make electricity !
  • Compost is waste-to-energy too, as it can halve
    the use of fossil-fuel-based chemical fertilisers
    at no extra cost.
  • IPNM Integrated Plant Nutrient Mgt uses
  • city compost along w chem-fert less water
  • needed for crops strong roots less pesti-
  • cide better fruit yield,colour,flavour,shelf-life

11
Paddy, 6 wks after transplanting. Left plot
replaced 1/2 chemical fert with city compost at
no extra cost
12
NEVER OUTSOURCE OVER 50 COLLECTION TRANSPORT
  • Ensure healthy competition, avoid both union
  • pressure and monopolistic private practices.
  • Ramky is a disaster in Aurangabad
  • Never give CollectionTransport Process-
  • ingDisposal to same party without stringent
  • city 3rd-party monitoring. A2Z is a scam in
  • Kanpur. Shows 400 tpd recd but actuals are
  • 40 tpd. Regular complaints in press, DTE etc.
  • Blacklist such Cos so others do not suffer.

13
CLUSTERS ARE WORST OPTION !
  • They will be nobodys baby,just like Common
  • Effluent Treatment Plants. Substandard
  • waste will reach it, like Akbars milk hundi.
  • Small Medium Towns now have advantage
  • of manageable quantities of waste and many
  • can easily become no-outside-dump cities
  • with unmixed discards decentralised SWM.
  • Villages resisting outside waste will force this

14
  • Two biobins 6x3x 2.5 high can take 40 kg wet
    waste in 300 Kochi apts.Waste is added daily,
    with bioculture or 5 old compost and turned
    daily with a three-prong fork. Compost ready in 1
    month. See www.cleancity.in
  • 45 tpd mgt onsite in Kochi alone.

15
Plastic in mixed waste is a major problem in
composting and needs very costly machinery to
remove
16
BEST Door ToDoor COLLECTION IS PRIMARY cum
SECONDARY
  • In Nasik, Madikeri etc a tractor stops every
  • few houses to collect waste. In Suryapet, wet-
  • dry wastes are transported clearly separate to
  • waste-processing point. Ideal for Small/Med
  • Towns. Further dry-waste separation is done
  • outside vehicle at sorting and baling point.
  • Pushcarts bins allow full sorting at doorstep

17
BENEFITS OF DECENTRALISED SWM
  • Savings in transport labour, diesel, repairs
  • can pay for biobins on homes waived cess.
  • Good onsite compost for residents and city.
  • Fewer traffic jams, carbon emissions, no
  • pollution of distant unmonitored spaces.
  • Plan for dry waste sorting spaces DWSS in
  • every Ward to accept ALL dry wastes, selling
  • recyclables and baling low-value unwanteds.

18
OPTIONS FOR UNWANTED PLASTICS
  • Shred low-value plastics, laminates for
  • Plastic Roads which should be mandatory
  • within all ULB limits for far better road life.
  • P2F Plastics To Fuel will soon become viable.
  • Useful as AFRAlternate Fuel Resources in
  • cement kilns to replace coal. Densify for use.
  • Only PVC releases dioxins when burnt, phase out
    then ban short-life applications.

19
MSW Rules only require BIOLOGICAL STABILISING of
wet waste.
  • E.g. in windrows, with 4-6 weekly turnings.
    Compost plant is not required.
  • Only needs parking-lot discipline, with sincere
  • officer to ensure waste is unloaded in rows.
  • Use wastewater for composting, not virgin
    groundwater if avoidable.
  • Give stabilised waste to farmers to get space.

20
(No Transcript)
21
COMPACTORS ARE TOTALLY UNSUITABLE FOR 2dy
TRANSPORT
  • Compacting dry waste makes it unsortable and
    unusable for the recycling trade
  • Compacted wet waste is mostly incompress-ible and
    turns anaerobic and smelly
  • Matching vehicle design for primary-to-
  • secondary waste transfer remains a challenge
  • and leads to compactor use only because
  • they can be loaded at ground level.
  • Decentralised SWM avoids this need.

22
ADMINISTRATIVE POLITICAL WILL is ABSOLUTELY
NECESSARY FOR SUCCESSFUL SWM
  • Technology is never the problem, solutions at all
    scales of operation are available.
  • Payment-by-weight encourages mixing of debris and
    silt into household waste, making all unusable.
    So pay by household served, or by volume-adjusted
    wt of max 0.5 ton per cubic meter of vehicle
    capacity.

23
BEGIN AWARENESS TRG IN ULB
  • Awareness for PKs / SKs and their maistrys
  • / supervisors on SEPARATE TRANSPORT of
  • dry waste, pure wet waste, mixed-wet waste.
  • Citizens cooperate fast whhen they see this.
  • Give new councillors MLAs a good SWM briefing
    to help them take sound decisions.
  • Give maistrys upwards imprest 1 days pay for
    rapid response in the field.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com