Title: The Case for a Vermont Carbon Tax
1The Case for a Vermont Carbon Tax
2Rationale
- Simplification
- Replace existing energy taxes with a single tax
on carbon content of fuels. - Behavioral Change
- Encourage reduced consumption of fossil fuels and
reduced CO2 emissions. - Revenue Leveraging
- Make use of revenues to purchase energy saving
efficiencies and alternatives to fossil fuels.
3Current Energy Taxes
Rate 04 Revenue
Gasoline Tax .19 / gal 71.9
Diesel Tax .26 / gal 18
Sales Tax on Comm. Energy 5 (with exceptions) 15
Utilities Gross Receipts .3-.5 of gross oper. revenue 5.7
Fuel Gross Receipts .5 on retail sales 5.5
TOTAL 116.1
4Carbon Tax Pro/Con
- PRO
- Broad influence- consumers, transport.
- Low transaction costs
- Ease of administration
- Produces recyclable revenue
- CON
- Emissions reductions not predictable
- Vulnerable pricing due to inflation/ price shocks
- Not targeted to reduce all GHGs.
- Regressive
5Carbon Tax Proposal
- 100 per ton tax on carbon content of fuels.
- Applied at point where fuels enter vermont
economy. - Revenues recycled back to taxpayers (individual
and commercial). - Comparable tax on nuclear and large hydro (market
competitiveness).
6Revenue Estimates
100/ton tax on hydro/nukes Minus existing energy taxes
Total 364,500,000 248,400,000
Residential 112,400,000 76,600,000
Commercial 71,500,000 48,800,000
Industrial 53,000,000 36,100,000
Transportation 127,500,000 86,900,000
7Price Effects on Fuels
2004 Increase
Gasoline ( per gallon) .29 -.19 .10 increase
Electricity (cents / kWh) .01 - existing taxes
Natural gas (cents/ therm) 17.2 - existing taxes
Fuel Oil ( per gallon) .34 - existing taxes
Coal ( per ton) 76 - existing taxes
8Energy Savings and CO2 Reductions
Energy Use (TBTU) 125.56
Energy Saved (TBTU) 4.98
GHG Emissions (CO2 equiv. tons) 9,702,000
GHG Emissions Reduced (CO2 equiv. tons) 386,000
9Trading Carbon Offsets
- Emerging markets for emissions/ sequestration
trading - Kyoto Signatory nations
- EU cap and trade system (2005)
- Chicago Climate Exchange
- Northeastern States cap and trade system (2005)
- Allows for trading CO2 emissions with carbon
sequestering sinks. - the biggest commodities market in the world.
-R. Sandor (Northwestern Univ. / CCX)
10Carbon Trading Potential for VT
Agricultural/Forest Land
- States (NE,AK) have begun quantifying
sequestration potential of land. - VT forests hold a carbon stock of 492.6 MMTC
(1997). - Carbon tax revenues can be used to quantify
capacity/pool land holdings/define compliance
mechanisms for trading. - US farmers can sequester 200 MMTC annually / add
4-6 billion gross income (10 increase in
average net farm income).