Decision%20Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Decision%20Analysis

Description:

Title: Decision Analysis Author: John S. Loucks IV Last modified by: adenny Created Date: 8/27/1996 9:26:02 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:180
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: John1952
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Decision%20Analysis


1
Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edwards
University
2
Statistical Methods for Quality Control
  • Statistical Process Control
  • Acceptance Sampling

3
Quality Terminology
  • Quality is the totality of features and
    characteristics of a product or service that
    bears on its ability to satisfy given needs.

4
Quality Terminology
  • Quality assurance refers to the entire system of
    policies, procedures, and guidelines established
    by an organization to achieve and maintain
    quality.
  • The objective of quality engineering is to
    include quality in the design of products and
    processes and to identify potential quality
    problems prior to production.
  • Quality control consists of making a series of
    inspections and measurements to determine whether
    quality standards are being met.

5
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
  • The goal of SPC is to determine whether the
    process can be continued or whether it should be
    adjusted to achieve a desired quality level.
  • If the variation in the quality of the production
    output is due to assignable causes (operator
    error, worn-out tooling, bad raw material, . . .
    ) the process should be adjusted or corrected as
    soon as possible.
  • If the variation in output is due to common
    causes (variation in materials, humidity,
    temperature, . . . ) which the manager cannot
    control, the process does not need to be adjusted.

6
SPC Hypotheses
  • SPC procedures are based on hypothesis-testing
    methodology.
  • The null hypothesis H0 is formulated in terms of
    the production process being in control.
  • The alternative hypothesis Ha is formulated in
    terms of the process being out of control.
  • As with other hypothesis-testing procedures, both
    a Type I error (adjusting an in-control process)
    and a Type II error (allowing an out-of-control
    process to continue) are possible.

7
Decisions and State of the Process
  • Type I and Type II Errors
  • State of Production Process
  • Decision

H0 True In Control
Ha True Out of Control
Correct Decision
Type II Error Allow out-of-control process to
continue
Continue Process
Correct Decision
Type I Error Adjust in-control process
Adjust Process
8
Control Charts
  • SPC uses graphical displays known as control
    charts to monitor a production process.
  • Control charts provide a basis for deciding
    whether the variation in the output is due to
    common causes (in control) or assignable causes
    (out of control).

9
Control Charts
  • Two important lines on a control chart are the
    upper control limit (UCL) and lower control limit
    (LCL).
  • These lines are chosen so that when the process
    is in control, there will be a high probability
    that the sample finding will be between the two
    lines.
  • Values outside of the control limits provide
    strong evidence that the process is out of
    control.

10
Types of Control Charts
  • An x chart is used if the quality of the output
    is measured in terms of a variable such as
    length, weight, temperature, and so on.
  • x represents the mean value found in a sample of
    the output.
  • An R chart is used to monitor the range of the
    measurements in the sample.
  • A p chart is used to monitor the proportion
    defective in the sample.
  • An np chart is used to monitor the number of
    defective items in the sample.

11
x Chart Structure
x
UCL
Center Line
Process Mean When in Control
LCL
Time
12
Control Limits for an x Chart
  • Process Mean and Standard Deviation Known

13
Example Granite Rock Co.
  • Control Limits for an x Chart Process Mean
  • and Standard Deviation Known
  • The weight of bags of cement filled by
    Granites packaging process is normally
    distributed with a mean of 50 pounds and a
    standard deviation of 1.5 pounds.
  • What should be the control limits for samples
    of 9 bags?

14
Example Granite Rock Co.
  • Control Limits for an x Chart Process Mean
  • and Standard Deviation Known
  • ????? 50, ? 1.5, n 9
  • UCL 50 3(.5) 51.5
  • LCL 50 - 3(.5) 48.5

15
Control Limits for an x Chart
  • Process Mean and Standard Deviation Unknown
  • where
  • x overall sample mean
  • R average range
  • A2 a constant that depends on n taken
    from
  • Factors for Control Charts table


_
16
Factors for x and R Control Charts
  • Factors Table (Partial)

17
Control Limits for an R Chart
  • UCL RD4
  • LCL RD3
  • where
  • R average range
  • D3, D4 constants that depend on n
    found in Factors for Control
    Charts table

_
_
_
18
Factors for x and R Control Charts
  • Factors Table (Partial)

19
Example Granite Rock Co.
  • Control Limits for x and R Charts Process Mean
  • and Standard Deviation Unknown
  • Suppose Granite does not know the true mean and
    standard deviation for its bag filling process.
    It wants to develop x and R charts based on
    twenty samples of 5 bags each.
  • The twenty samples resulted in an overall
    sample mean of 50.01 pounds and an average range
    of .322 pounds.

20
Example Granite Rock Co.
  • Control Limits for R Chart Process Mean
  • and Standard Deviation Unknown
  • x 50.01, R .322, n 5
  • UCL RD4 .322(2.114) .681
  • LCL RD3 .322(0) 0

_

_
_
21
Example Granite Rock Co.
  • R Chart

22
Example Granite Rock Co.
  • Control Limits for x Chart Process Mean
  • and Standard Deviation Unknown
  • x 50.01, R .322, n 5
  • UCL x A2R 50.01 .577(.322) 50.196
  • LCL x - A2R 50.01 - .577(.322) 49.824




23
Example Granite Rock Co.
  • x Chart

24
Control Limits for a p Chart
  • where
  • assuming
  • np gt 5
  • n(1-p) gt 5
  • Note If computed LCL is negative, set LCL
    0

25
Example Norwest Bank
  • Every check cashed or deposited at Norwest Bank
    must be encoded with the amount of the check
    before it can begin the Federal Reserve clearing
    process. The accuracy of the check encoding
    process is of utmost importance. If there is any
    discrepancy between the amount a check is made
    out for and the encoded amount, the check is
    defective.

26
Example Norwest Bank
  • Twenty samples, each consisting of 250 checks,
    were selected and examined when the encoding
    process was known to be operating correctly. The
    number of defective checks found in the samples
    follow.

27
Example Norwest Bank
  • Control Limits for a p Chart
  • Suppose Norwest does not know the proportion of
    defective checks, p, for the encoding process
    when it is in control.
  • We will treat the data (20 samples) collected
    as one large sample and compute the average
    number of defective checks for all the data.
    That value can then be used to estimate p.

28
Example Norwest Bank
  • Control Limits for a p Chart
  • Estimated p 80/((20)(250)) 80/5000 .016

29
Example Norwest Bank
  • p Chart

30
Control Limits for an np Chart
  • assuming
  • np gt 5
  • n(1-p) gt 5
  • Note If computed LCL is negative, set LCL 0

31
Interpretation of Control Charts
  • The location and pattern of points in a control
    chart enable us to determine, with a small
    probability of error, whether a process is in
    statistical control.
  • A primary indication that a process may be out of
    control is a data point outside the control
    limits.
  • Certain patterns of points within the control
    limits can be warning signals of quality
    problems
  • Large number of points on one side of center
    line.
  • Six or seven points in a row that indicate either
    an increasing or decreasing trend.
  • . . . and other patterns.

32
Acceptance Sampling
  • Acceptance sampling is a statistical method that
    enables us to base the accept-reject decision on
    the inspection of a sample of items from the lot.
  • Acceptance sampling has advantages over 100
    inspection including less expensive, less
    product damage, fewer people involved, . . . and
    more.

33
Acceptance Sampling Procedure
Lot received
Sample selected
Sampled items inspected for quality
Results compared with specified quality
characteristics
Quality is not satisfactory
Quality is satisfactory
Accept the lot
Reject the lot
Send to production or customer
Decide on disposition of the lot
34
Acceptance Sampling
  • Acceptance sampling is based on
    hypothesis-testing methodology.
  • The hypothesis are
  • H0 Good-quality lot
  • Ha Poor-quality lot

35
The Outcomes of Acceptance Sampling
  • Type I and Type II Errors
  • State of the Lot
  • Decision

H0 True Good-Quality Lot
Ha True Poor-Quality Lot
Correct Decision
Type II Error Consumers Risk
Accept H0 Accept the Lot
Correct Decision
Type I Error Producers Risk
Reject H0 Reject the Lot
36
Probability of Accepting a Lot
  • Binomial Probability Function for Acceptance
    Sampling
  • where
  • n sample size
  • p proportion of defective items in lot
  • x number of defective items in sample
  • f(x) probability of x defective items in
    sample

37
Example Acceptance Sampling
  • An inspector takes a sample of 20 items from a
    lot.
  • Her policy is to accept a lot if no more than 2
    defective
  • items are found in the sample.
  • Assuming that 5 percent of a lot is defective,
    what is
  • the probability that she will accept a lot?
    Reject a lot?
  • n 20, c 2, and p .05
  • P(Accept Lot) f(0) f(1) f(2)
  • .3585 .3774 .1887
  • .9246
  • P(Reject Lot) 1 - .9246
  • .0754

38
Example Acceptance Sampling
  • Using the Tables of Binomial Probabilities

39
Selecting an Acceptance Sampling Plan
  • In formulating a plan, managers must specify two
    values for the fraction defective in the lot.
  • a the probability that a lot with p0 defectives
    will be rejected.
  • b the probability that a lot with p1 defectives
    will be accepted.
  • Then, the values of n and c are selected that
    result in an acceptance sampling plan that comes
    closest to meeting both the a and b requirements
    specified.

40
Operating Characteristic Curve
41
Multiple Sampling Plans
  • A multiple sampling plan uses two or more stages
    of sampling.
  • At each stage the decision possibilities are
  • stop sampling and accept the lot,
  • stop sampling and reject the lot, or
  • continue sampling.
  • Multiple sampling plans often result in a smaller
    total sample size than single-sample plans with
    the same Type I error and Type II error
    probabilities.

42
A Two-Stage Acceptance Sampling Plan
Inspect n1 items
Find x1 defective items in this sample
Yes
Accept the lot
x1 lt c1 ?
No
Yes
Reject the lot
x1 gt c2 ?
No
Inspect n2 additional items
Find x2 defective items in this sample
Yes
No
x1 x2 lt c3 ?
43
End of Chapter
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com