West Virginia School Nutrition Standards Development and Implementation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

West Virginia School Nutrition Standards Development and Implementation

Description:

West Virginia School Nutrition Standards Development and Implementation Presented by Mary Kay Harrison, M.S. to the Institute of Medicine Committee on Nutrition ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:182
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: wvus
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: West Virginia School Nutrition Standards Development and Implementation


1
West Virginia School Nutrition Standards
Development and Implementation
  • Presented by
  • Mary Kay Harrison, M.S.
  • to the
  • Institute of Medicine
  • Committee on Nutrition Standards for Foods in
    Schools
  • February 13, 2006

2
A pilgrimage to statewide nutrition integrity
in schools 1973-2005A quest to a distant
sacred goal
3
West Virginia School Landscape
  • Schools 753
  • Districts 55 counties
  • Students 281,215
  • Needy rate 52
  • Community 65 rural (53 counties)
  • Statewide information tech system
  • WVDE Oct 2005 School Nutrition Program Report

4
Nutrition Landscape
  • National School Lunch Program
  • All public schools
  • 68 average student participation
  • School Breakfast Program
  • All public schools
  • 31 average student participation
  • District managed
  • State funding support 34 program costs
  • Closed campuses
  • Statewide standards

  • WVDE Oct 2005 School Nutrition Program Report

5
West Virginias Approach to Nutrition
Standards in Schools
  • History
  • Rationale
  • Strategies
  • Unanswered Questions
  • Lessons Learned

6
Science and BeliefsShape Standards
  • 70s -- Preventing nutritional deficiencies
    and dental caries
  • 80s -- Ensuring optimal growth and
    development
  • 90s -- Preventing chronic disease in
    adulthood
  • Today -- Addressing excess, imbalance and obesity
  • Tomorrow -- ?? (Meeting individual needs)

7
First Standards 1973 State Board of Education
Policy
  • prohibited sale of food other than Type A lunch
    in the cafeteria during mealtime, and allows only
    foods planned as part of the breakfast menu to be
    sold at breakfast
  • called for districts to establish local policies
    for other foods sold in school during the school
    day
  • surveyed all public and private schools to
    determine frequency and types of other foods
  • established state advisory council to study
    survey results and present recommendations
  • foods sold or served by the school at any time
    during the school day which are not part of a
    reimbursable meal

8
Standards for Other Foods
  • 1975 State Board of Education accepted Council
    recommendations and mandated during the school
    day --
  • No candy, soft drinks, chewing gum or flavored
    ice bars
  • No foods containing more than 39 sugar
  • All juice beverages contain a minimum 20 juice

9
1976 Standards Refined Reaffirmed
  • 1976 Expert panel convened to define banned foods
  • WVDE issued guidance on verifying compliance
  • Soft drink representatives called for repeal
  • State Nutrition Advisory Committee recommended no
    change
  • State Board of Education reaffirmed standards
  • Statewide training and education began

10
1977 Standard implemented with little effect on
student morale
11
Standards in a Larger Context Comprehensive
(Coordinated) School Health
  • 1991 Governor convened blue ribbon task force
    of business and community leaders to study and
    recommend school policies to improve the health
    of West Virginians
  • Process led by state public education and health
    officials using U.S. Centers for Disease Control
    model

12
Coordinated School Health Model
Health Education
Health Services
Family Community
Staff Wellness
Physical Education
Counseling
Nutrition Services
School Environment
13
Task Force Results
  • Limited examination
  • Only nutrition services, i.e., meals
  • Little knowledge of children and school
    environment
  • Lack of scientific evidence and measures
  • Limited conclusions
  • Nutrition programs hold promise for reducing
    chronic
  • disease rates
  • School meals do not live up to promise
  • Heightened awareness and perceived need
  • State Board of Education calls for committee to
    study and recommend nutrition policy

14
1992 Nutrition Standards Committee
  • 30 members representing
  • Teachers
  • Students Parents
  • Administrators
  • State Education Agency
  • School Boards
  • Food Service Directors Managers
  • Dietitians
  • Physicians Dentists
  • School Nurses
  • Food Industry
  • Higher Education

15
A Vision
  • 1 The total school environment fosters
    healthful choices
  • 2 Nutrition programs are an important integral
    part of the broader school curriculum
  • 3 All foods sold and served during the school
    day enhance learning and students quality of
    life
  • 4 All students have opportunities to choose
    meals that reflect the Dietary Guidelines for
    Americans

16
Committee Recommendations
  • Lunch standards based on DGA and RDAs
  • Additional foods for pregnant students
  • Job qualifications for district directors
  • Comprehensive local nutrition plans
  • State Nutrition Advisory Council
  • Assessment of effectiveness
  • Standards for other foods
  • No soft drinks, candy, chewing gum, flavored ice
    bars
  • No foods containing more than 39 sugar
  • No fruit beverage containing less than 20 real
    juice
  • No foods containing more than 8 gm fat per oz
    serving
  • Transfer of purchasing authority for continued
    noncompliance

17
State Legislatures Involvement
  • State Code 18-2-6a permits soft drink sales in
    high schools
  • during instructional day except at meal periods
  • with approval of local boards of education
  • designates use of profits
  • Complicated compliance monitoring

18
2004 Informal Survey of Local Directors
  • Since passage of Policy 4321.1, do you believe
    schools in your district are
  • 1. Serving meals to a higher percentage of
    students?
  • 2. Offering more variety and menu choices?
  • 3. Serving more fresh fruits and vegetables?
  • 4. Serving more grains, including whole grains?
  • 5. Offering more low-fat items?
  • 6. Offering more nutritious snack foods and
    beverages?

19
2004 Revisions to Practice Policy
  • WVDE directive on soft drinks
  • Requires competitive bidding and district level
    contract approval
  • Recommends advertising and marketing
    restrictions, serving size limits
  • Revised WVBE policy
  • Mandates that equally accessible healthy beverage
    (water juice) be sold as alternatives to soft
    drinks in high schools where soft drinks are sold
  • Prohibits food sales before and during lunch in
    elementary schools
  • Recommends nutritious food choices be made
    available wherever whenever food is sold or
    offered on school premises
  • Defines nutritious foods

20
Healthy Lifestyles LegislationA statewide
response to obesity crisis HB 2816
Enacted April 2005
  • State Healthy Lifestyles Office for cross-agency
    effort
  • Advisory bodies
  • Physical education activity requirements in
    schools
  • Measures of school progress (body mass index)
  • Voluntary private sector food labeling program
  • Healthy beverages in high schools selling soft
    drinks
  • 50 offered
  • healthy beverage defined

21
Contributing to Success
  • State Board of Education Leadership Initiative
  • Founded on research
  • Scientific evidence
  • Expert panels
  • Rooted in reality
  • Stakeholder advisors
  • Open forum
  • Pilots
  • Phase-in
  • Integrated with education
  • Accountability measures
  • Strengthened through training
  • Staff - Parents
  • Students - Business Community

22
Nagging Questions
  • Should standards be developed top down or
    bottom up?
  • What waves of new scientific evidence should we
    ride?
  • Is a patchwork of policies and rules effective?
  • Does the need for new standards outweigh the
    risks engendered in the development process?
  • Who should mind the store?
  • How do you know and deal with unintended
    consequences?
  • Are relationships stressed or strengthened?
  • Will the stick or the carrot work best?

23
Accountability
  • Sending the message -- This Is
    Important!
  • Compliance monitoring
  • School district child nutrition fiscal
    monitoring
  • State system for school accreditation
  • State/federal Child Nutrition Program system
  • State district response to complaints
  • Enforcement
  • School
  • District
  • State
  • Accountable parties
  • Sanctions
  • Fiscal
  • Other

24
Lessons Learned
  • Statewide Standards
  • should be imbedded in comprehensive
    health/nutrition policies
  • must relate to broader education values and goals
  • recognize schools capacity to meet standards
  • must hold school decision-makers accountable
  • Process
  • requires ongoing training and technical
    assistance
  • demands unwavering conviction and resolve
  • never easynever over

25
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com