The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs

Description:

An Example With Interactions A U-Do-It Case Study Replication Rope Pull Exercise U-Do-It Case ... Tabular and Graphical Methodology for 23 Designs Author: – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Mathem97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs


1
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of
ExperimentsPart I The Essentials of Full
Factorial Designs
  • Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James
    Lynch Center for Reliability and Quality
    SciencesDepartment of StatisticsUniversity of
    South Carolina803-777-7800

2
Part I.3 The Essentials of 2-Cubed Designs
  • Methodology
  • Cube Plots
  • Estimating Main Effects
  • Estimating Interactions (Interaction Tables and
    Graphs)
  • Statistical SignificanceWhen is an Effect
    Real?
  • An Example With Interactions
  • A U-Do-It Case Study
  • Replication
  • Rope Pull Exercise

3
U-Do-It Case Study Ball Bearing Example
  • Purpose of the Design
  • Test (Under Accelerated Conditions) New Bearing
    Prototypes for Use in a Specific Application for
    Which the Current Designs Performance Was
    Unsatisfactory.
  • Response of Interest y - Bearing Life (h).
  • Design Factors
  • Factor Levels (Lo,Hi)A Cage
    Design Current, NewB Outer Ring
    Osculation Current, New C Inner Ring Heat
    Treatment. Current, New
  • The 8 Standard Runs of the 23 Design Were
    Randomly Ordered, and Each Prototype Bearing
    Tested.
  • Empirical Basis for this data was motivated by
    C. Hellstrands article The necessity of modern
    quality improvement and some experiences with
    implications in the manufacture of ball bearings
    (1989, Philos. Trans. Royal Society London, A
    327, 529-537)

4
U-Do-It Case Study Ball Bearing Example - A
Typical Ball Bearing
5
U-Do-It Case Study Ball Bearing Example -
Operator Report Form
6
U-Do-It Case Study Ball Bearing Example -
Exercise Instructions
  • In Class
  • Put the results of the experiment in standard
    order and enter the data into a cube plot (in
    Minitabsee handout)
  • Estimate the factor effects (in Minitab)
  • Construct and interpret a normal probability plot
    of the factor effects (in Minitab)

7
U-Do-It Case Study Ball Bearing Example -
Exercise Instructions
  • In Class
  • Construct BC interaction graph in Minitab use
    table and graph to interpret BC interaction
  • Determine the factor settings that maximize
    bearing life and estimate the Mean Response (EMR)
    at these settings. How close is your answer to
    the observed mean response at your optimal
    settings?
  • If you would like to do hand calculations, blank
    signs tables, cube plots, etc. are provided over
    the next several slides

8
U-Do-It Case Study Ball Bearing Example - Signs
Table
9
U-Do-It Case Study Ball Bearing Example - Cube
Plot
10
U-Do-It Case Study Ball Bearing Example - Seven
Effects Paper
11
U-Do-It Case Study Ball Bearing Example -
Interaction Table
12
U-Do-It Case Study Solution Ball Bearing Example
- Cube PlotBearing Lifetimes (h) Shown
  • FactorA Cage DesignB Outer Ring
    OsculationC Inner Ring Heat Treatment
  • Levels Lo Current, Hi New

13
U-Do-It Case Study Solution Ball Bearing Example
- Signs Table
14
U-Do-It Case Study Solution Ball Bearing Example
- Probability Plot
15
U-Do-It Case Study Solution Ball Bearing Example
- Completed BC Interaction Table
16
U-Do-It Case Study Solution Ball Bearing Example
- BC Interaction Plot
  • FactorsB Outer Ring OsculationC Inner Ring
    Heat Treatment
  • Levels Lo Current, Hi New
  • Interpretation
  • Choose the Hi Level for both B and C to Maximize
    the Bearing Life

17
U-Do-It Case Study Solution Ball Bearing Example
- Expected Mean Response
  • Since the BC Interaction is Significant, the Main
    Effects B and C and the BC Interaction are
    Included
  • Factor A is NOT Included Since it was Not
    Significant
  • For B 1, C 1, EMR 41.5
    (1)(45.5)(1)(43)(1)(39.5)/2
    105.5 (vs (99112)/2 105.5 Observed MR)

18
U-Do-It Case Study Solution Ball Bearing Example
- Interpretation of the Experiment
  • Unexpected Interaction Discovered (Would Not Have
    Been Discovered Using One-at-a-Time
    Experimentation). Results May Carry Over to
    Other Bearing Designs.
  • Contrary to Existing Beliefs, the Two Cage
    Designs had Very Similar Lifetimes. This was
    Very Important Since Bearings Were Much Cheaper
    to Produce Under One of the Two Cage Designs.
  • New Designs Performance (In the Specific
    Application Under Investigation) Far Superior to
    That of the Current Bearing Being Used.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com