Cendant Corporation Henry Silverman Major Case 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Cendant Corporation Henry Silverman Major Case 4

Description:

Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) Other titles: Arial MS P Times New Roman Wingdings Calibri Layers 1_Layers Cendant Corporation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: homew100
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cendant Corporation Henry Silverman Major Case 4


1
Cendant CorporationHenry SilvermanMajor Case 4
  • Rashid Hijazi
  • ACCT530
  • Professor Michael Abner

2
Contents
  • Company Overview
  • Ethical Issues
  • Questions
  • Optional Question
  • Conclusion
  • References

3
Company Overview
  • Henry Silverman, a business executive and private
    equity investor created Hospitality Franchise
    Systems (HFS) as a vehicle to acquire a number of
    hotel franchises in the early 1990s. Among
    Silvermans purchases were such brands as Ramada
    and Howard Johnson's as well as Days Inn, which
    he was able to buy for 290 million (less than
    half what he had sold it for) after the company
    had filed for bankruptcy in 1991. Silverman
    quickly took Hospitality Franchise Systems public
    in a 1992 IPO.

4
Company Overview
  • Henry R. Silverman is an American entrepreneur
    and private equity investor. Silverman is best
    known for his role in building Cendant
    Corporation into a multibillion dollar business
    services company that provided car rentals,
    travel reservation services as well as real
    estate brokerage services and was also the
    largest franchisor of hotels globally.
  • Among the brands that Silverman controlled
    included hotels and motels such as AmeriHost
    INN, Days Inn, Howard Johnson's, Ramada, Super
    8 and Travelodge.

5
Company Overview
  • Building on his experience with Days Inn, while
    at Blackstone Silverman created Hospitality
    Franchise Systems (HFS) which would acquire a
    number of hotel franchises. Among Silvermans
    purchases were such brands as Ramada and Howard
    Johnson's as well as Days Inn, which he was able
    to buy for 290 million (almost half what he had
    sold it for) after the company had filed for
    bankruptcy in 1991. Hospitality Franchise Systems
    went public in a 1992 IPO.

6
Company Overview
  • Silvermans compensation was the subject of
    scrutiny in 2004. In 2002, on the back of strong
    performance at Cendant, Silverman signed a
    10-year contract that provided for medical
    benefits, office space as well as travel perks
    including a corporate airplane and a company car
    and driver. Of greater attention was the
    compensation Silverman received in 2003.
    Silvermans 2003 compensation was estimated at
    60 million, which included 14 million in cash
    salary and bonus, 37 million in stock options
    and 4.6 million paid as premiums on a company
    funded life insurance policy.

7
Company Overview
  • Cendant Corporation was a New York-based provider
    of business and consumer services, primarily
    within the real estate and travel industries. In
    2005 and 2006, Cendant broke up and spun off or
    sold its constituent businesses. Although the
    company was based in New York City, the majority
    of Cendant's headquarters employees were located
    in Parsippany-Troy Hills, New Jersey.
  • The last CEO of Cendant was Henry Silverman.
  • In early 2005, Cendant purchased ebookers for
    just under 190 million. Later in the year,
    Cendant acquired London based Gullivers Travel
    Associates.

8
Ethical Issues
  • The SEC expects a public company to report
    truthful information in all of its filings with
    the Commission. The accounting profession is
    harmed when an audit does not obtain sufficient,
    competent evidence, judged with professional
    skepticism.
  • Objectivity requires that the company should
    approach its decision about the proper revenue
    recognition procedure with fair-mindedness and
    without partially to one set of stakeholders.

9
Ethical Issues
  • Using rights theory, it is not right to mislead
    the investors by making it look as though the
    company is doing better than it really is. Any
    attempt to intentionally misstate the financial
    statements violates the categorical imperative.
  • Using justice theory, stakeholder interests are
    not fairly represented because the perceived
    interests of the management are given priority
    over the interest of all other stakeholders.

10
Ethical Issues
  • Rule-utilitarianism requires that the correct
    rule should be followed. Act-utilitarianism
    requires that the act that creates the greatest
    good for the greatest number of stakeholders
    should be selected.
  • None of the stakeholders benefit from an action
    that misstates net income. Using virtue theory,
    honesty requires that the statements should be
    truthful and recognize revenue using generally
    accepted accounting principles.
  • Trustworthiness means that the accountants should
    not violate the investors faith that the
    statements are accurate and reliable.

11
Questions
  • Briefly summarize the accounting techniques used
    by Cendant to manipulate financial results.
    Categorize each technique into one of Schilits
    financial shenanigans.

Cendant used aggressive accounting to shift
current marketing expenses to a later period by
capitalizing the costs this is shenanigan number
4. Cendant also shifted future expenses to the
current period and later released reserves into
income. When Cendant made acquisition, it took
large restricting charges to create bogus income
this is shenanigan number 7. Then in subsequent
period, Cendant released these reserves into
income this is shenanigan number 5.
12
Questions
  • Describe the failings of EY with respect to
    conducting an audit in accordance with GAAS.
    Include in your discussion any violation of the
    AICPA Code of Professional Conduct.
  • Cendant made materially false statements to EY
    to mislead the auditors into believing the
    Companys financial statements conformed to GAAP.
  • The statements concerned the creation and
    utilization of merger-related reserves
  • The auditors failed to recognize evidence that
    the company's establishment and use of the
    Cendant Reserve did not conform to GAAP.
  • While the component categories changed over the
    different drafts, the total amount of the reserve
    never changed materially
  • Despite this evidence, the auditors did not
    obtain adequate analyses, documentation, or
    support for changes they observed in the various
    revisions of the schedules submitted to support
    the establishment of the reserves

13
Questions
  • EY did not seem to meet the GAAS standards of
    integrity, objectivity, independence, and
    supervision of assistants of the general
    standards. It also did not obtain sufficient,
    competent evidence, nor express an opinion based
    on the evidence. The violations of the AICPA Code
    of Professional Conduct were Rule 101,
    Independence 102, Integrity and Independence
    201, General Standards 202, Accounting
    Principles 203, Accounting Principles and 501,
    Acts Discreditable.

14
Questions
  • Evaluate the actions of Cendant management with
    respect to its obligations to shareholders. Did
    it meet those obligations? Why or why not?

Cendant management did not meet the criteria of
fiduciary duty and did not protect the interests
of all stakeholders. Additionally the management
profited from their own wrong-doing by selling
the Companys securities at inflated prices while
the fraud was underway and undisclosed. These
sales of securities brought Cendant management
millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains.
15
Questions
  • The corporate governance requirements for Cendant
    that were stipulated in the class action lawsuit
    seem to emphasize the need for independence of
    the board of directors and audit committee. Using
    the corporate governance provisions in the
    Sarbanes-Oxley Act and NYSE listing requirements,
    identify the additional governance requirements
    that could have been imposed on Cendant. What
    should they be designed to accomplish?

The NYSE-listed companies adopt and disclose
their corporate governance guidelines thatcover
director qualifications, responsibilities, access
to management, compensation, management
succession and annual evaluation of the board.
16
Questions
Additional governance criteria that could have
been imposed include adding a financial expert as
one of the independent members of the audit
committee strengthening the internal audit
function by adding a director of internal audit
to management with direct reporting to the audit
committee, guidelines on executive compensation
and tying to performance measures, executive
compensation reviewed by the compensation
committee and approved by the entire board. These
measures are designed to protect all stakeholders
of a corporation it directs, controls and holds
management accountable to achieve the long term
strategic goals of the stakeholders.
17
Optional Question
  • The rules in accounting for merger and other
    restructuring reserves were changed after the
    frauds at companies like Cendant and Lucent.
    Research the new rules and explain how they
    differ from the rules in effect at the time of
    the Cendant fraud and why the rules were changed.

In the past, the pooling of interests method
accounted for a business combination as the
uniting of the ownership of interests of two or
more companies by exchange of equity securities
no acquisition was recognized as the combination
was completed without disbursing resources of the
entities. The recorded assets and liabilities of
the entities were carried forward to the combined
corporation at the recorded amounts. Income of
the combined corporation was the income of the
entities for the entire fiscal period in the
which the combination occured and the income for
prior periods were combined and restated as
income of the combined corporation.
18
Conclusion
  • After a pooling of interests had occurred,
    companies undertook restructuring and set up
    reserves to write-down overstated assets. Often
    the assets written off were not overstated.
  • The rules were changed to the acquisition method
    to stop the manipulation of reserves and goodwill
    under the pooling of interests method.
  • After a pooling of interests had occurred,
    companies undertook restructuring and set up
    reserves to write-down overstated assets. Often
    the assets written off were not overstated.
  • The rules were changed to the acquisition method
    to stop the manipulation of reserves and goodwill
    under the pooling of interests method.

19
References
  • Ethical Obligations and Decision Making in
    Accounting Text and Cases, 2nd Edition
  • http//www.cendantbenefits.com/
  • www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints.htm
  • Cendant Corporation Litigation, 264 F3d 201 264
    F.3d 201 (3rd Cir. 2001), http//openjurist.org/26
    4/f3d/201/in-re-cendant-corporation-litigation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com