Drug Impaired Driving: Importance of Toxicology in Assessing the Problem and Developing Countermeasures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Drug Impaired Driving: Importance of Toxicology in Assessing the Problem and Developing Countermeasures

Description:

Barry K Logan PhD, DABFT WA State Toxicologist Director, Forensic Laboratory Services Bureau Washington State Patrol McGovern Award Dinner Cosmos Club, Washington DC ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Drug Impaired Driving: Importance of Toxicology in Assessing the Problem and Developing Countermeasures


1
Drug Impaired Driving Importance of Toxicology
in Assessing the Problem and Developing
Countermeasures
Barry K Logan PhD, DABFT WA State
Toxicologist Director, Forensic Laboratory
Services Bureau Washington State Patrol
  • McGovern Award Dinner
  • Cosmos Club, Washington DC, June 2006

2

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • How do we know if we have a problem?
  • Household surveys
  • Trauma admissions
  • Fatally injured drivers
  • Surviving drivers in fatal crashes
  • Drivers arrested for DUI

3

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • How do we know if we have a problem?
  • Household surveys
  • Trauma admissions
  • Fatally injured drivers
  • Surviving drivers in fatal crashes
  • Drivers arrested for DUI

4

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • Household Survey, 2004 (prior year)
  • Any Illicit Drug Use 19.9 Million 8.3
  • Marijuana 14.6 million 6.1
  • Cocaine 2.0 Million 0.8
  • Methamphetamine 1.4 Million 0.5
  • Hallucinogens 0.93 Million 0.4

SAMHSA, Household Drug Use Survey, 2004
5

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
Logan, J For Sci, 1996 41(3)457-464
6

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • Household Survey, 2003-4 (Driving)
  • In 2004, an estimated 13.5 percent of persons
    aged 12 or older (32 Million) drove under the
    influence of alcohol at least once in the past
    year.
  • In 2003, an estimated 10.9 million persons
    reported driving under the influence of an
    illicit drug during the past year. This
    corresponds to 4.6 percent of the population aged
    12 or older.
  • The 2003 rates were 14.1 percent among young
    adults aged 18 to 25 and 3.1 percent among adults
    aged 26 or older. These rates were all similar to
    the 2002 rates.

SAMHSA's National Surveys on Drug Use and Health,
2003, 2004
7

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • Household Surveys, 2002-3 (DUI arrests)
  • 5.9 of drivers 21 and older reporting that they
    had driven under the influence of alcohol and
    illicit drugs during the past year had been
    arrested for DUI in the past year
  • 4.8 of those driving under the influence of only
    illicit drugs had been arrested for DUI in the
    past year
  • 2.9 of those who had driven under the influence
    of only alcohol during the past year had been
    arrested for DUI in the past year.

SAMHSA's National Surveys on Drug Use and Health
in 2002 and 2003
8

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • How do we know if we have a problem?
  • Household surveys
  • Trauma admissions
  • Fatally injured drivers
  • Surviving drivers in fatal crashes
  • Drivers arrested for DUI

9

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • Drug and Alcohol Use Among Drivers Admitted to a
    Level-1 Trauma Center

108 Drivers from MVC tested for illicit drug use
66 drug/ alcohol pos. 51 drug pos.
Walsh JM, Flegel R, et al Acc Anal Prev 37
(2005) 894901
10

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • Drug and Alcohol Use Among Drivers Admitted to a
    Level-1 Trauma Center

108 Drivers from MVC tested for illicit drug use
Alcohol 30.6 Marijuana 26.9 (Alcohol
also 37.9) Cocaine 11.6 Methamphetamine
5.6 Benzodiazepines 11.2 Opiates 10.2
Walsh JM, Flegel R, et al Acc Anal Prev 37
(2005) 894901
11

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • How do we know if we have a problem?
  • Household surveys
  • Trauma admissions
  • Fatally injured drivers
  • Surviving drivers in fatal crashes
  • Drivers arrested for DUI

12
Combined Drug and Alcohol use in Fatally Injured
Drivers in Washington State
  • Sample submissions from 39 counties coroners/
    medical examiners
  • Drivers who died within 4hrs of traffic crash
    from February 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002
  • 657 traffic fatalities
    397 (60.4) drivers
    171 (26)
    passengers
    75 (11.4) pedestrians
  • N370 (93) driver cases suitable for testing

Schwilke, dos Santos, Logan, J For Sci, in press
2006
13
Fatally Injured Drivers - 2002
Schwilke, dos Santos, Logan, J For Sci, in press
2006
14
Fatally Injured Drivers - 2002
  • Alcohol and/ or drugs 62
  • Drugs present 35
  • Alcohol cases positive for drugs 41

Schwilke, dos Santos, Logan, J For Sci, in press
2006
15
Drug Positivity
Schwilke, dos Santos, Logan, J For Sci, in press
2006
16
Fatally Injured Drivers
BAC gt0.00 (n150) BAC gt0.00 (n150)
n
Cannabinoids 27 17.33
Cocaine 12 8.00
Diphenydramine 7 4.67
Methamphetamine 6 4.00
Methadone 4 2.67
Nordiazepam 4 2.67
Hydrocodone 3 2.00
Midazolam 2 1.33
MDMA 1 0.67
potentially impairing drug 62 41.33
Schwilke, dos Santos, Logan, J For Sci, in press
2006
17

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • How do we know if we have a problem?
  • Household surveys
  • Trauma admissions
  • Fatally injured drivers
  • Surviving drivers in fatal crashes
  • Drivers arrested for DUI

18

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • Drivers tested for Alcohol FARS Data Set, NHTSA

19

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • Drivers tested for Drugs FARS Data Set, NHTSA

20

Alcohol and Traffic Fatalities 2004
Limitations of FARS data
One of the major differences among States is in
the degree of testing for driver and non-occupant
BACs. These differences in testing affect the
accuracy and reliability of the estimates
presented, which for 2004 range from a low of
7-percent-known BACs to a high of
82-percent-known BACs. States with higher rates
of known BACs yield estimates of fatal crash
alcohol involvement with greater accuracy and
precision. NCSA States Alcohol Estimates 2004
21

Alcohol, Drugs and Driving
  • How do we know if we have a problem?
  • Household surveys
  • Trauma admissions
  • Fatally injured drivers
  • Surviving drivers in fatal crashes
  • Drivers arrested for DUI

22

Combined Drug and Alcohol Use in Drivers
Suspected of Vehicular Assault and Homicide.
Samples collected Based on circumstances Based
on appearance of subject Based on DRE
evaluation Based on subject request Based on
injuries to suspect, and exigent sample
collection.
Logan BK, Barnes L, AAFS, Feb 2006
23
Vehicular Assault and Homicide(2002-2003, n700
drivers)
Logan BK, Barnes L, AAFS, Feb 2006
24
Alcohol and Drug Use
  • Fatally injured drivers
  • Felony collision
  • suspects

Logan BK, Barnes L, AAFS, Feb 2006
25
Vehicular Assault and Homicide (2002-2003 n700
drivers)
Logan BK, Barnes L, AAFS, Feb 2006
26
Combined Alcohol and Drug Use
  • Fatally injured drivers
  • Felony collision
  • suspects

27
Summary
  • Comparing felony suspects and fatally injured
    drivers.

Felony Deceased
Positive alc and/or drug 82 62
Any alcohol positive 55 45
Any drug positive 51 35
Logan BK, Barnes L, AAFS, Feb 2006
28
Felony Collisions Drug use by BAC
  • 458 drivers had alcohol on board
  • 43 of 66 (65) were drug positive
  • 66 (14) had BAC lt0.08

58
86 gt0.08BAC
14
21
28
7
7
Logan BK, Barnes L, AAFS, Feb 2006
29
Conclusions
  • About 65 of suspects in vehicular homicides and
    assaults with blood alcohol 0.01 - 0.08g/100mL,
    have impairing drugs on board.
  • When impairment doesnt match the BAC - think
    about other drugs.
  • Synergistic drug effects can produce marked
    symptoms even with low BAC.
  • Predominantly drugs of abuse.

30
Felony Collisions Drug use by BAC
  • 458 drivers (65) had alcohol on board
  • 392 (86) had BAC gt0.08
  • 192 of 392 (49) had drugs present also.

26.7
86 gt0.08BAC
14
8.9
12.8
4.8
2.0
Logan BK, Barnes L, AAFS, Feb 2006
31
Conclusions
  • About 49 of suspects in vehicular homicides and
    assaults with blood alcohol greater than 0.08,
    have impairing drugs on board.
  • The investigation usually stops with BAC gt0.08.
  • Polysubstance use is the norm, rather than the
    exception.
  • Comprehensive toxicology is needed

32

Conclusions
  • Combined alcohol and drug use is a frequent
    finding in traffic trauma drivers, felony DUI
    suspects, and deceased drivers.
  • Lack of comprehensive testing obscures true rates
    of drug use by drivers in both populations.
  • Detection of drug use in impaired drivers is
    limited by officer awareness, lack of training,
    sample collection and laboratory resources.

33

Conclusions
  • Toxicologists are ill-prepared to testify in drug
    impairment cases, with few centralized resources,
    and limited relevant research
  • Prosecutors are often reluctant to take these
    cases to trial, as they are complex, require use
    of expert witnesses, involve extensive discovery,
    generate time consuming motions, and result in
    lengthy trials

34
When things go wrong
  • School-bus driver charged in death allegedly
    took drugs
  • Seattle Times February 28th 2004
  • A 42-year-old woman was high on morphine when she
    drove a school bus that struck and killed a
    13-year-old student in December, Pierce County
    police and prosecutors say in charges filed
    yesterday.

35
When things go wrong
  • Subject seemed upset
  • No SFSTs administered
  • No DRE called
  • voluntary blood draw.
  • Toxicology
  • Morphine 0.13mg/L
  • Bupropion
  • Bupropion metabolites

36
When things go wrong
  • Tacoma bus driver not guilty in teenager's death
  • Seattle times, Sept 2005
  • A school-bus driver has been found not guilty of
    vehicular homicide in the 2003 death of a
    13-year-old boy. Prosecutors said (the
    defendant) was under the influence of morphine
  • (The defendants) attorneys argued that she had
    built up a tolerance to the drugs, prescribed to
    manage pain from a degenerative disease.
  • (The Victims) family has sued the school
    district for 10 million for negligence.

37

DUID Nowhere to go but up
  • Goals
  • Remove drug impaired drivers from the road.
  • Assess incidence and demographics of DUID
  • Educate about the effects of drugs and driving.
  • Discourage the drug-impaired from driving.
  • Change learned drug-driving behaviors.

38

Tried and True Approaches
  • Enforcement
  • Make Traffic Law Enforcement a priority
  • Train officers to recognize drug impairment
  • Provide specialized training in documenting drug
    impairment
  • Screen all causing drivers for impairment
  • Provide toxicology resources to LEAs
  • Raise awareness of DUID among prosecutors

39

Officers trained in recognizing drug impairment.
40

Drugs and Driving Cases Submitted

41

Tried and True Approaches
  • Toxicology
  • Have a more comprehensive policy in testing for
    drugs in traffic crimes
  • Test all deceased drivers for the presence of
    drugs and alcohol
  • Report to FARS
  • Test for both illicit and prescription drugs at
    realistic cut-offs

42

Drugs and Traffic Fatalities
  • WA Drivers tested for Drugs

43
Blood Screening Practices
Drug/Drug Class Cut Off (ng/mL) Mode (ng/mL)
Amphetamines 20-1000 50
Barbiturates 2-1000 100
Benzodiazepines 1-300 100
Cannabinoids 2-50 20
Cocaine met. 20-300 50
Methadone 20-200 50
Morphine 20-200 50
PCP 2.5-100 10
Meprobamate 2-5000 1000

SOFT/AAFS Survey 2005
44

Tried and True Approaches
  • Government
  • Provide incentives to states to pass DUID laws,
    including per se approach for controlled
    substances
  • Provide incentives and resources targeted at
    traffic law enforcement
  • Collect and provide drug test data to document
    trends and demographics
  • Coordinate research efforts in DUID detection,
    technology, research and investigation

45

Use of NHTSA Funding for DUI Emphasis
WSP DUI Enforcement 1999-2004
402, 157 and 163 funds
46

Tried and True Approaches
  • Couper and Logan (2005)
  • Drug pharmacology
  • Blood concentrations
  • Effects on driving

http//www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/research/jo
b185drugs/drugs_web.pdf
47

Acknowledgements
  • Washington State Patrol
  • Washington State Toxicology Laboratory
  • Friends and Colleagues in Forensic Toxicology.
  • Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com