hyper A Useful Toolbox for Hybrid Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

hyper A Useful Toolbox for Hybrid Systems

Description:

hyper A Useful Toolbox for Hybrid Systems Shankar Sastry, Jonathan Sprinkle, Mike Eklund, Ian Mitchell UC Berkeley – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Edwar276
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: hyper A Useful Toolbox for Hybrid Systems


1
hyperA Useful Toolbox for Hybrid Systems
  • Shankar Sastry, Jonathan Sprinkle,
  • Mike Eklund, Ian Mitchell
  • UC Berkeley

2
What Are Hybrid Systems?
  • Dynamical systems with interacting continuous and
    discrete dynamics

3
Why are Hybrid Systems Hard?
  • All implicit error in continuous analysis,
    coupled with switching criteria, leads to
    possible catastrophic error

Slide by Rafael Garcia
4
Why are Hybrid Systems Hard?
  • Zeno behavior
  • Event transitions happen so rapidly that the
    simulator grinds to a halt
  • A Toolbox should detect this

Slide by Edward Lee
5
What are the pieces?
  • Modeling Simulation
  • Control classify discrete phenomena, existence
    and uniqueness of execution, Zeno Branicky,
    Brockett, van der Schaft, Astrom
  • Computer Science composition and abstraction
    operations Alur-Henzinger, Lynch, Sifakis,
    Sztipanovits,Varaiya
  • Analysis Verification
  • Control stability, Lyapunov techniques
    Antsaklis, Branicky, Michel, LMI techniques
    Johansson-Rantzer, optimal control Branicky,
    Sussmann, Caines
  • Computer Science Algorithmic Alur-Henzinger,
    Sifakis, Pappas-Lafferrier-Sastry or deductive
    methods Lynch, Manna, Pnuelli
  • Controller Synthesis
  • Control optimal control Branicky-Mitter,
    Bensoussan-Menaldi, hierarchical control
    Caines, Pappas-Sastry, supervisory control
    Lemmon-Antsaklis, model predictive techniques
    Morari Bemporad, safety specifications
    Lygeros-Tomlin-Sastry
  • Computer Science algorithmic synthesis Maler,
    Pnueli, Asarin, Wong-Toi
  • Observability and Diagnosability
  • Control observersBemporad, Koutsoukos, Vidal
  • Computer Science Biswas, Karsai, Zhao

6
Tool Integration
  • No one tool exists for all of these
  • Several academic toolmakers created HSIF
  • Hybrid Systems Interchange Format
  • Failed to mature for a few reasons
  • Tool-specific, and Tool-driven, not capability
    driven
  • Not enough programming power behind it
  • No thought to coverage of corner cases (Lee,
    Zheng)

7
Tool Integration
Example correct output
  • What is needed is a framework that utilizes
    interchange format
  • Must support what we know about hybrid systems
    semantics, encourage tools integration
  • Implicit tool semantics makes fully meaningful
    translation impossible, or impractical
  • The proper specification of the semantics of an
    interchange format would ease this difficulty
  • Leverage HSIF as a learning tool for the semantic
    specification of the hyper core

RK 2
-
3 variable
-
step solver and
breakpoint solver determine
sample times
Note two values at
Note two values at
the same time
the same time
Incorrect output
Slide by Edward Lee
8
Tool Integration
  • What about industry-standard tools?
  • Many big industries are bound to Matlab, but
    clamoring for verification/synthesis capabilities
  • Suggests a real need for getting this interchange
    piece right and showing examples for how to do
    the interchange with existing tools or toolboxes

9
Example Integration HyVisual
  • Ptolemy IIs HyVisual
  • http//ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/hyvisual/

Slide by Edward Lee
10
HyVisual
  • Clear contribution
  • well-defined simulation and semantic behavior
  • Assets
  • Platform-independent model editing
  • Visualization tools
  • Reasoned meaning of hierarchical containment
  • Well-formulated for the business of numerical
    solutions and execution of complex, nonlinear,
    deterministic hybrid systems

11
HyVisual Integration Benefits
  • Contains a rich set of examples of hybrid systems
  • Useful for other tool integrations
  • Platform independent, open source
  • Lacks synthesis/runtime tools, so could then
    integrate with other tools with these capabilities

12
Example Integration A Toolbox of LSM
  • Ian Mitchells Toolbox of Level Set Methods
  • http//www.cs.ubc.ca/mitchell/ToolboxLS/
  • Numerical algorithms for dynamic implicit
    surfaces and Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential
    equations

13
Level Set Methods
  • Clear contribution
  • Leverage level sets to perform reachability
    calculations for hybrid systems
  • Assets
  • Computationally sound for low dimensions
  • Works in Matlab (no toolboxes required)

14
Reachable sets how they are calculated
Time dependent H-J equation
  • First order hyperbolic PDE
  • Solution can form kinks (discontinuous
    derivatives)
  • For the backwards reachable set, find the
    viscosity solution Crandall, Evans, Lions,
  • Level set methods
  • Convergent numerical algorithms to compute the
    viscosity solution Osher, Sethian,
  • Non-oscillatory, high accuracy spatial derivative
    approximation
  • Stable, consistent numerical Hamiltonian
  • Variation diminishing, high order, explicit time
    integration

15
Level Set Methods Integration Benefits
  • Give additional capability to tools such as
    HyVisual
  • Add a hybrid systems (rather than numerical)
    front-end to the LSM Toolbox
  • Provide controller synthesis capability, as well
    as safety calculations

16
Hyper Framework
  • A new toolbox/toolsuite with the following
    characteristics
  • High performance simulation
  • High robustness factor
  • High level modeling (with refinement)
  • High number of interacting tools
  • Provide a formal interchange between tools
  • Low-level fundamental model specifications (a
    core)
  • Requires a set of implementable functions to
    call
  • Add a base package with interfaces for
    interoperability, and a lightweight editor
  • Include industrial-strength solvers through
    transformations

17
Hyper Framework
Interoperability Interfaces
18
Hyper Framework
  • Extensible to other tools
  • Existing examples for integration through
    HyVisual/T-LSM
  • A more focused, useful, core interchange format
  • When integrated, allows persistence of legacy
    models in industry (Matlab/Simulink), now with
    advantage(s) of synthesis/verification
  • Newer/faster tools can be tested against known
    true
  • Check for same behavior
  • Can be used for regression testing

19
Conclusions
  • Not trying to build Rome in 1 day
  • Focused application to certain capabilities at
    first
  • Concentration on not solving all the worlds
    problems at once
  • Restricting initial release to useful and mature
    tools
  • Immediately providing two diverse toolbox
    integrations as examples to others

20
(No Transcript)
21
BASE Package
Simulators Matlab, HyVisual
Simulators Matlab, HyVisual
Simulators Matlab, HyVisual
CORE
Extraction
modeldatabase
Verification Engine HyTech, LSM, CheckMate
Verification Engine HyTech, LSM, CheckMate
Verification Engine HyTech, LSM, CheckMate
Manipulation
Visualization
Editor
Transformations XSL, GReAT
Transformations XSL, GReAT
Transformations XSL, GReAT
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com