Historical Linguistics: Change, reconstruction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Historical Linguistics: Change, reconstruction

Description:

Overview Reconstruction Time-depth Conversative vs. innovative languages Reconstruction and prehistory More ... written documents Hittite 1300 B.C. Sanskrit ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1248
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Sharon447
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Historical Linguistics: Change, reconstruction


1
Historical LinguisticsChange, reconstruction
  • LING 400
  • Winter 2010

2
Overview
  • Reconstruction
  • Time-depth
  • Conversative vs. innovative languages
  • Reconstruction and prehistory
  • More historical change
  • Morphological, morphosyntactic
  • Semantic

please turn off your cell phone
For further learning about historical
linguistics LING 454
3
Time-depth
  • Persian is an old language.
  • All (modern) daughters of proto-language have
    equal time-depth.

4
Time-depth
  • Proto-Indo-European 5000-6000 years ago
  • Proto-Germanic 2500-3500
  • Oldest IE written documents
  • Hittite 1300 B.C.
  • Sanskrit 1200 B.C.
  • Greek 1000 B.C. (Mycenean earlier)

5
Reconstruction
  • The comparative method
  • assemble cognates
  • deduce proto-form, meaning
  • Reconstructible
  • Not necessarily attested in all branches
  • eg?w- drink
  • Hittite
  • Latin ebrius drunk

6
A cognate set
  • Sanskrit snu?a
    daughter-in-law
  • Old English snoru
    daughter-in-law
  • Old Church Slavonic snuxa daughter-in-law
  • Latin nurus
    daughter-in-law
  • Greek nuós
    daughter-in-law
  • Armenian nu bride,
    daughter-in-law
  • Albanian nuse bride

7
Reconstruction
  • sn or n? daughter-in-law
  • Latin nix, niv- snow
  • English snow
  • PIE sneig?w- to snow
  • vs.
  • Latin ne- not
  • Old English ne not
  • PIE ne not
  • u, OCS u, OE o lt u
  • Medial s? ?? r?
  • Sanskrit s gt ? / u__
  • Latin s gt r/ V__V, ? Germanic
  • Greek, Armenian s gt 0 / V__V
  • (ending, accent)
  • PIE snusos
  • daughter-in-law or bride?
  • most early IE societies patriarchal and
    patrilocal
  • daughter-in-law in most bride restricted

8
Conservative vs. innovative
  • Sanskrit snu?a lt snusos
  • conserves sn, u accent
  • innovates s gt ? / u__
  • Albanian nuse bride
  • conserves u, medial s
  • innovates s gt 0 / __n, semantics

9
Reconstruction and prehistory
  • Calvert Watkins the lexicon of a language
    remains the single most effective way of
    approaching and understanding the culture of its
    speakersThe reconstruction of vocabulary can
    offer a fuller, more interesting view of the
    culture of a prehistoric people than archaeology
    precisely because it includes nonmaterial
    culture.

10
Proto-Indo-European
  • med?u- mead, honey
  • daiwer- husbands brother
  • wifes relatives
  • sneig?w- snow
  • laks- salmon (lox)
  • mori- body of water lake (?), sea (?)
    (mermaid)
  • gr?-no grain (gt corn)
  • owi- sheep (gt ewe)
  • dem?- house, household
  • dem(?)- to build (gt timber)
  • kwel- to revolve, go around, kw(e)-kwl-o-
    wheel

11
Historical linguistics
  • 1786 Sir William Jones observed similarities
    between Sanskrit, Ancient Greek, Latin, Gothic,
    Celtic, Old Persian
  • 19th century reconstruction of PIE
  • 20th century on
  • Hittite, Tocharian
  • Comparative method applicable elsewhere

12
Major branches of Athabaskan family
38 daughter languages
13
Language change
  • Languages may change on various levels
  • phonetics, phonology
  • morphology
  • syntax
  • semantics

14
Morphemes disappear
  • PA Deg
    Xinag Witsuwiten Tsekene
  • mans daughter -tshe? -t?h??
    -tsh?? --
  • arm -q??ne? -qon
    -- -kònè?

15
Paradigm leveling
  • Elimination of irregularity among morphologically
    related forms

16
Babine-Carrier Babine-Carrier Witsuwiten Witsuwiten
progressive future progressive future
1sS i-s- th-i-s- i-s- th-?-s-
2sS ?-n- th-?-n- i-n- th-?-n-
3sS i- th-i- i- th-?-
Leveled progressive paradigm (uniformly
i) Leveled future paradigm (uniformly ?)
17
Semantic change
Reduction (hyponym formation)
  • Proto-Athabaskan Tsekene
  • -??m snore, growl -hxõh snore
  • Witsuwiten
  • -nt??c dance -ntec (white
    people) dance

18
Extension
Hypernym formation
  • Proto-Athabaskan Tsekene
  • ci?ce blueberry ???e berry

19
Where was Proto-Athabaskan spoken?
  • Michael Krauss
  • the PA homeland (Urheimat) was in eastern
    Alaska, interior, perhaps extending into Canada
    already.

20
Considerations
  • Deep vs. shallow differentiation
  • Location of related languages
  • Reconstructed vocabulary

21
Differentiation
  • Deep differentiation long occupation of
    territory
  • Alaska, western BC
  • Closely related recent spread
  • Mackenzie R.
  • Pacific Coast
  • Apachean

22
Na-Dene family
23
Related languages
  • Usually nearby
  • Eyak
  • mouth of Copper R.
  • Tlingit
  • Alaska panhandle

24
Reconstructed vocabulary
  • Mountains and snow
  • ts?? mountain
  • ?aç snowshoe
  • ?u ice, icicle, glacier

1910 map
Hudson Bay Mt., B.C.
25
Summary
  • All languages change over time
  • Change occurs at all levels of grammar
  • Earlier stages can often be reconstructed, with
    implications for prehistory

26
Question
  • Bronze Age 3300-1200 BC (bronze lt coppertin)
  • PIE ajes- copper or bronze (attested in Latin,
    Greek, Sanskrit)
  • Iron Age (1300 BC on) (iron, steel)
  • isarno iron only attested in Germanic, Celtic
  • Are ajes and isarno relevant to dating of PIE?
    (PIE estimated 5000-6000 BC.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com