Utility of 0-3 km Bulk Shear Vectors as a Predictor for Quasi-Linear Convective System (QLCS) Tornadoes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Utility of 0-3 km Bulk Shear Vectors as a Predictor for Quasi-Linear Convective System (QLCS) Tornadoes

Description:

Utility of 0-3 km Bulk Shear Vectors as a Predictor for Quasi-Linear Convective System (QLCS) Tornadoes. McKenna W. Stanford. University of South Alabama – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: noaa161
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Utility of 0-3 km Bulk Shear Vectors as a Predictor for Quasi-Linear Convective System (QLCS) Tornadoes


1
Utility of 0-3 km Bulk Shear Vectors as a
Predictor for Quasi-Linear Convective System
(QLCS) Tornadoes
McKenna W. Stanford University of South
Alabama Meteorology Weather-Ready Nation National
Weather Service, Springfield, MO David Gaede,
Jason Schaumann, John Gagan
NOAAs National Weather Service
2
Outline
  • Introduction/Objectives
  • Background
  • Methodology
  • Criteria Recognition
  • Results
  • Statistical Analyses
  • Application to Protection of Life Property
  • Next Steps
  • Summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • References

3
Introduction/Objectives
  • McKenna W. Stanford
  • University of South Alabama
  • Meteorology, Major
  • Mathematics, Minor
  • National Weather Service, Springfield, MO WFO
  • Weather-Ready Nation
  • Personal Motivation My interest in severe
    convective storms and aspirations to investigate
    them and improve warning strategies for
    destructive events aided in my selection of this
    project.
  • Objective Statistically verify identified
    predictors for QLCS tornadoes and improve Tornado
    Warning lead times in order to satisfy NOAAs
    objective for reduced loss of life, property,
    and disruption from high-impact events.

4
Co-Collaborators
  • Contributors to this project included
  • David Gaede, Mentor, Science Operations Officer
  • Jason Schaumann, Co-Mentor, Senior Forecaster
  • John Gagan, Co-Mentor, Senior Forecaster

5
QLCS Background
  • Quasi-Linear Convective Systems (QLCSs)
  • Produce large swaths of wind damage
  • Descending rear-inflow jets (RIJs)
  • Embedded microbursts macrobursts
  • Localized swaths of (E)F-0 to (E)F-1 wind damage
    can occur
  • Can contain embedded tornadoes
  • Usually (E)F-0 to (E)F-1 damage
  • Documented damage intensity up to (E)F-4

6
QLCS vs. Supercell
Moore, OK KTLX 20 May 2013
Sunset Hills, MO KLSX 31 December 2010
Photo Courtesy of NWS St. Louis
Photo Courtesy of FEMA
7
Motivation for Research
  • Much research has been conducted involving
    environments and physical processes related to
    supercell tornadoes versus those of QLCSs
  • Warning skill and lead times for QLCS tornadoes
    remains poor
  • Most warning decision forecasters issue Tornado
    Warnings after mesovortex development
  • Recent studies have shown the average lead time
    for this technique is only around 5 minutes
  • Can also result in high False Alarm Rates (FAR) -
    crying wolf

8
Additional Disadvantages to Current Tornado
Warning Strategies
  • Due to the quick nature of mesovortex genesis,
    mesovoritices can form in between radar volume
    scans
  • Radar beam will overshoot features at distances
    greater than 40 nautical miles (nm) from the
    radar
  • Where does the 0.5 tilt reach 1 km AGL?
  • How do we resolve these issues?

9
Alternative Methodology to Anticipate QLCS
Tornadogenesis
  • Schaumann and Przybylinski (2012) examined
    several QLCS events to identify three co-existing
    ingredients, both physical properties and radar
    characteristics, that present an increased
    likelihood for mesovortex genesis and rapid
    intensification
  • (1) A portion of the QLCS in which the system
    cold pool and ambient low-level shear are
    nearly balanced or slightly shear dominant AND
  • (2) The 0-3 km line-normal bulk shear magnitudes
    are equal to or greater than 15 m s-1 (30 knots)
    AND
  • (3) A rear-inflow jet (RIJ) or enhanced outflow
    causes a surge or bow in the line
  • The intent of this study is to verify this
    three-ingredients method and provide statistical
    significance to its practice

10
Methodology Case Selection
  • Period of study 2005-2011
  • 31 cases
  • Warm cold season

11
Mesovortex Identification
GR2Analyst Software
12
Surge Identification
Surge on rear flank of leading convective line
Surge on forward flank of leading convective line
GR2Analyst Software
GR2Analyst Software
13
Determining Balance Regime
0.5 Z
0-3 km Bulk Shear Vectors
  • Five Different Regimes
  • Shear Dominant
  • Slightly Shear Dominant
  • Balanced
  • Slightly Cold Pool Dominant
  • Cold Pool Dominant

Shear Dominant
Cold Pool Dominant
Balanced
Balanced Slightly Shear Dominant are regimes
necessary in three-ingredients method
14
Determining 0-3 km Bulk Shear Vector Magnitude
Direction

4-Panels Courtesy of Chad Gravelle, Ph.D.
15
Determining 0-3 km Line-Normal Shear Magnitude
Updraft-Downdraft Convergence Zone (UDCZ)
?u
T
?u sin(?)m
m
?u line-normal magnitude of 0-3 km bulk shear T
angle between convective line and 0-3 km bulk
shear vector m magnitude of 0-3 km bulk shear
vector
16
Performance of Three-Ingredients Method
  • 67 Mesovortices
  • 64 Non-Mesovortex Surges
  • 52 of identified mesovorticies produced at least
    one report of winds 50 knots and/or a tornado
  • Verification for three-ingredients method
  • Probability of Detection (POD) 79
  • False Alarm Rate (FAR) 23

17
0-3 km Bulk and Line-Normal Shear for all
Mesovortices
Mean Bulk Shear 37 kts
Mean Line-Normal Shear 33 kts
18
0-3 km Line-Normal Shear for all Mesovortices
Non-Mesovortex Surges
Mean Line-Normal Shear for Non-Mesovortex Surges
26 kts
Mean Line-Normal Shear for Mesovortices 33 kts
19
Three-Ingredients Method for all Mesovortices
  • Average Surge Genesis to Wind Damage Lead Time
    21 minutes
  • Average Surge Genesis to Tornado Lead Time
  • 18 minutes

20
Tornado Warning Baseline
  • Government Performance Requirements Act (GPRA)
    goals for 2013
  • Probability of Detection (POD) 72
  • False Alarm Rate (FAR) 70
  • Tornado Warning Lead Time 13 minutes

21
Three-Ingredients Method for Mesovortex Tornadoes
  • Scenario If a Tornado Warning is issued as soon
    as all three ingredients are met

2013 GPRA Goals 2013 GPRA Goals 3 Ingredients Method Improvement
POD 72 90 22
FAR 70 65 5
Lead Time 13 minutes 18 minutes 5 minutes
  • New Warning Decision Strategy vs. Current
  • 18 minute lead time is a substantial increase
    over the average of 5 minutes currently offered
    by warning decision forecasters issuing Tornado
    Warnings upon the actual genesis of mesovortices

22
Future Work
  • SLS Manuscript and Poster
  • Ernest F. Hollings Scholar Research
  • Formal Research
  • Conduct NOAA/NWS Training
  • Interactive Webinars
  • Work with Warning Decision Training Branch

23
Summary
  • Mesovortex genesis and strong intensification is
    favored
  • In a portion of the QLCS in which the cold pool
    and ambient low-level shear are nearly balanced
    or slightly shear-dominant
    AND
  • Where 0-3 km line-normal bulk shear magnitudes
    are equal to or greater than 30 knots AND
  • Where a rear-inflow jet (RIJ) or enhanced outflow
    causes a surge or bow in the line.

24
Summary (cont)
  • 52 of 67 identified mesovorticies produced at
    least one report of winds 50 knots and/or a
    tornado
  • Utilization of the three-ingredients method for
    issuing Tornado Warnings would greatly exceed
    2013 GPRA goals
  • POD 90
  • Lead Time 18 minutes

25
Summary (cont)
  • Results of utilizing the three-ingredients method
    offers a substantial and efficient means to
    reduce the loss of life, property, and disruption
    from high-impact events through the issuance of
    more accurate and timely warnings

26
Acknowledgements
  • Staff at Springfield WFO
  • Chad Gravelle, Ph.D. for providing the 4-panel
    RUC files
  • Ryan Kardell, Meteorological Intern, Springfield
    WFO for providing several programs used to
    collect and interrogate data

27
Questions?
28
References
  • Atkins, N. T., J. M. Arnott, R. W. Przybylinski,
    R. A. Wolf, and B. D. Ketcham, 2004 Vortex
    structure and evolution within bow echoes. Part
    I Single-Doppler and damage analysis of the 29
    June 1998 derecho. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132,
    2224-2242.
  • _____, C. S. Bouchard, R. W. Przybylinski, R. J.
    Trapp, and G. Schmocker, 2005 Damaging surface
    wind mechanism within the 10 June 2003 Saint
    Louis bow echo during BAMEX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133,
    2275-2296.
  • _____, and M. St. Laurent, 2009a Bow Echo
    Mesovortices. Part I Processes That Influence
    Their Damaging Potential. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137,
    14971513.
  • _____, and M. St. Laurent, 2009b Bow Echo
    Mesovortices. Part II Their Genesis. Mon. Wea.
    Rev., 137, 15141532.
  • Burgess, D. W., 1974 Study of a right moving
    thunderstorm utilizing new single Doppler radar
    evidence. Masters Thesis, Dept. of Meteor.,
    University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK. 77 pp.
  • _____, and B. F. Smull, 1990 Doppler radar
    observations of a bow echo with a long-track
    severe windstorm. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Severe
    Local Storms, Kananaskis Park, AB, Canada, Amer.
    Meteor. Soc., 203-208.
  • Bryan, G. H., D. Ahijevych, C. Davis, S. Trier,
    and M. Weisman, 2005 Observations of cold pool
    properties in mesoscale convective systems during
    BAMEX. Preprints, 11th Conf. on Severe Local
    Storms, Albuquerque, Nm, Amer. Meteor. Soc.,
    JP5J. 12.

29
References (cont)
  • Corfidi, S., F., J. H. Merritt, and J. M
    Fritsch,1996 Predicting the movement of
    mesoscale convective complexes. Wea. Forecasting,
    11, 41-46.
  • ____, J. H. Merritt, and J. M Fritsch,1996
    Predicting the movement of mesoscale convective
    complexes. Wea. Forecasting, 11, 41-46.
  • ____, 1998 Forecasting MCS mode and motion.
    Preprints, 19th Conf. on Severe Local Storms,
    Minneapolis, MN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 626629.
  • ____, 2003 Cold Pools and MCS Propagation
    Forecasting the Motion of Downwind-Developing
    MCSs. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 9971017.
  • Distance Learning Operations Course (WDTB)
  • Doswell, C. A. III, 2000 "A Primer on Vorticity
    for Application in Supercells and Tornadoes".
    Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale
    Meteorological Studies, Norman, Oklahoma.
  • Engerer, N. A., D. J. Stensrud, and M. C.
    Coniglio, 2008 Surface characteristics of
    observed cold pools. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136,
    48394849.
  • Forbes, G. S., and R. M. Wakimoto, 1983 A
    concentrated outbreak of tornadoes, downbursts
    and microbursts, and implications regarding
    vortex classification. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111,
    220-235.

30
References (cont)
  • Funk. T. W., K. E. Darmofal, J. D. Kirkpatrick,
    V. L. DeWald, R. W. Przybylinski, G. K.
    Schmocker, and Y. -J. Lin, 1999 Storm
    reflectivity and mesocyclone evolution associated
    with the 15 April 1994 squall line over Kentucky
    and southern Indiana. Wea. Forecasting, 14,
    976-993.
  • Houze, R. A., Jr., S. A. Rutledge, M. I.
    Biggerstaff and B. F. Smull, 1989 Interpretation
    of Doppler weather radar displays of midlatitude
    mesoscale convective systems. Bull. Amer. Meteor.
    Soc., 70, 608-619.
  • Jorgensen, D. P., and B. F. Smull, 1993
    Mesovortex circulations seen by airborne Doppler
    radar within a bow-echo mesoscale convective
    system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74, 2146-2157.
  • Markowski, P. M., Y. Richardson, E. Rasmussen, J.
    Straka, R. Davies-Jones, and R. J. Trapp, 2008
    Vortex lines within low-level mesocyclones
    obtained from pseudo-dual-Doppler radar
    observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 3513-3535.
  • Przybylinski, R. W., 1995 The bow echo
    Observations, numerical simulations, and severe
    weather detection methods. Wea. Forecasting, 10,
    203-218.

31
References (cont)
  • _____, Y. J., Lin, C. A. Doswell III, G. K.
    Schmocker, T. J. Shea, T. W. Funk, K. E.
    Darmofal, J. D. Kirkpatrick, and M. T. Shields,
    1996 Storm reflectivity and mesocyclone
    evolution associated with the 15 April 1994
    derecho, Part I Storm structure and evolution
    over Missouri and Illinois. Preprints, 18th Conf.
    on Severe Local Storms, San Francisco, CA, Amer.
    Meteor. Soc., 509-515.
  • _____, G. K. Schmocker, and Y. J. Lin, 2000 A
    Study of Storm and Vortex Morphology during the
    Intensifying Stage of Severe Wind Mesoscale
    Convective Systems. Preprints, 20th Conf. on
    Severe Local Storms, Savannah, GA, 6.4.
  • Rotunno, R.J., J. B. Klemp, and M. L. Weisman,
    1988 A theory for strong, long-lived squall
    lines. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 463-485.
  • Trapp, R. J., E. D. Mitchell, G. A. Tipton, D. A.
    Effertz, A. I. Watson, D. L. Andra, and M. A.
    Magsig, 1999 Descending and non-descending
    tornadic vortex signatures detected by WSR-88Ds.
    Wea. and Forecasting, 14, 625-639.
  • _____, and M. L. Weisman, 2003 Low-level
    mesovortices within squall lines and bow echoes.
    Part II Their genesis and implications. Mon.
    Wea. Rev., 131, 28042823.
  • _____, S. A. Tessendorf, E. S. Godfrey, and H. E.
    Brooks, 2005 Tornadoes from squall lines and bow
    echoes. Part I Climatological distribution. Wea.
    Forecasting, 20, 2334.
  • Weisman, M. L. and R. W. Przybylinski, 1999
    Mesoscale convective systems Squall lines and
    bow echoes, COMET CBL module, UCAR.

32
References (cont)
  • _____, and R. J. Trapp, 2003 Low-level
    mesovortices within squall lines and bow echoes.
    Part I Overview and dependence on environmental
    shear. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 27792803.
  • Schaumann, J. S., and R. W. Przybylinski, 2012
    Operational Application of 0-3 km Bulk Shear
    Vectors in Assessing QLCS Mesovortex and Tornado
    Potential. Preprints, 26th Conf. on Severe Local
    Storms, Nashville, TN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 9.10.
  • Schmidt, J. M., and W. R. Cotton, 1989 A High
    Plains squall line associated with severe surface
    winds. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, No. 3, 281-302.
  • Rasmussen, E. N., 2003 Refined supercell and
    tornado forecast parameters. Wea. Forecasting,
    18, 530-535.
  • Thompson, R. L., R. Edwards, J. A. Hart, K. L.
    Elmore, and P. Markowski, 2003 Close proximity
    soundings within supercell environments obtained
    from the Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting,
    18, 1243-1261.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com