Investigating Depth-Fanout Trade-Off in WiMAX Mesh Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Investigating Depth-Fanout Trade-Off in WiMAX Mesh Networks

Description:

Salim Nahle Luigi Iannone Benoit Donnet Timur Friedman Laboratoire LIP6 CNRS Universit Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6 First Weird Workshop on WiMAX, Wireless ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: acb99
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Investigating Depth-Fanout Trade-Off in WiMAX Mesh Networks


1
Investigating Depth-Fanout Trade-Off in WiMAX
Mesh Networks
  • Salim Nahle
  • Luigi Iannone
  • Benoit Donnet
  • Timur Friedman
  • Laboratoire LIP6 CNRS
  • Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6
  • First Weird Workshop on WiMAX, Wireless and
    Mobiliy
  • 22-05-2007

2
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Depth-fanout trade-off
  • A traffic model for mesh trees
  • Simulation
  • Conclusions and future work

3
Introduction
  • Wireless mesh networks (WMNs) have many
    advantages.
  • 802.11-based WMNs have been widely studied.
  • Problem short range.
  • Consequence dense and suboptimal deployments.
  • IEEE 802.16 promises to transcend this
    limitation.
  • It operates in two modes PMP and MESH

4
Introduction
5
Introduction
6
Introduction
7
Introduction
What is the best number of hops ?
Route around obstacles
Dead zones
Long links
Multiple shorter hops
8
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Depth-fanout trade-off
  • A traffic model for mesh trees
  • Simulation
  • Conclusions and future work

9
Trade-off fanout vs depth
600m
600m
3000m
830m
Maximum depth 7
Maximum depth 2
10
Depth vs average hop distance
11
Depth vs control overhead
12
Bit rate as a function of Distance
Bit rate (Mbps)
Distance (m)
Graph from Betancur et al. NS2 workshop 2006
13
Example
4Km
S
D
Data Rate 2.2Mbps
2.2 Mbps
2Km
2Km
S
D
Data Rate 3.6Mbps
7.2 Mbps
7.2 Mbps
S
1.3Km
D
1.3Km
1.3Km
Data Rate 3.6Mbps
11 Mbps
11 Mbps
11 Mbps
14
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Depth-fanout trade-off
  • A traffic model for mesh trees
  • Simulation
  • Conclusion and future work

15
WiMAX Mesh mode (Background)
  • Mesh mode specifications were integrated into the
    IEEE 802.16-2004.
  • They define the control mechanisms and management
    messages to establish connections in Mesh Network
    architecture.

16
Traffic model for mesh tree (1/2)
  • We assume a balanced or a quasi-balanced tree.
  • Parameters
  • Ca average number of children SSs per parent
    node
  • m tree depth or number of levels in the WiMAX
    mesh tree.

17
Traffic model for mesh tree (2/2)
  • Four types of traffic patterns at each SS
  • Traffic in the uplink direction towards the
    Internet via the BS
  • Traffic in the downlink direction from the
    Internet via the BS
  • Intra-mesh traffic in the uplink direction
  • Intra-mesh traffic in the downlink direction
  • Note that, within the mesh context, uplink and
    downlink are defined as the traffic in the
    direction of the mesh BS and traffic away from
    the mesh BS repectively.

18
Traffic via BS (1/2)
BS
7u
7u
7d
7d
Traffic per link
l
l
Note l du
3u
3u
3u
3u
3d
3d
3d
3d
u outgoing own traffic d Incoming own traffic
l Average total traffic
l
l
l
l
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
19

Traffic via BS (2/2)
  • Average traffic on all the links AiAi-1
  • (Number of nodes in level Ai)l (Average
    traffic from Ai1)
  • (Number of nodes in level
    Ai1)l (Average traffic from Ai2)

Average traffic per link
20
Intra-mesh Traffic (1/2)
Ca2 N2222313 Intra-mesh traffic per node u
BS
Traffic sent Traffic received
u
u
21

Intra-mesh Traffic (2/2)
Ui

Ui
u
Ui1
u
u
u
With
Ui2
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

22
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Depth-fanout trade-off
  • A traffic model for mesh trees
  • Simulation
  • Conclusions and future work

23
Simulation
  • Objective
  • Study the impact of the tree depth m on the
    aggregate throughput capacity.
  • Simulation setup
  • Number of nodes 49
  • Distributed uniformly in a 77 grid topology
  • m varies between 1 and 7
  • Traffic Requests are sent as just described

24
Throughput via the BS
25
Intra-mesh throughput
26
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Depth-fanout trade-off
  • A traffic model for mesh trees
  • Simulation
  • Conclusions and future work

27
Conclusions
  • Increasing the depth may increase the throughput
    even without allowing for concurrent
    transmissions
  • Only long hops must be split.
  • Recent extension shows better results

28
Future work
  • Different traffic models
  • Allowing for concurrent transmissions (future
    work).
  • Investigate distributed scheduling capacity.
  • Optimizing the number of time slots used by each
    scheme is another perspective.

29
Questions
  • Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com