Patient specific QC in Aarhus - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Patient specific QC in Aarhus

Description:

Patient specific QC in Aarhus ... not seen with acc QC True beam 5 patients treated at Clinac and True ... efter kalibrering af mlc med bommen af varian. ikke inklinum. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Lone155
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Patient specific QC in Aarhus


1
Patient specific QC in Aarhus
  • Lone Hoffmann
  • Ulrik Vindelev Elstrøm, Mai-Britt Kyed Jørgensen

2
VMAT introduction
  • Introduced in May 2009
  • First patient June the 17th, 2009
  • Treated approx. 800 patients
  • Primarily pelvic cancers
  • Prostate, cervix, bladder, anal, rectum,..
  • Other types
  • Brain, sarcomas, abdominal

3
Patient specific QA
  • Perform Delta4 verification for all patients
  • Normalization to daily output
  • Gamma(3,3) gt 95
  • Most patients G(3,3) gt 97

4
Test/learning plans
  • 10 prostate plans (15MV)were created with
  • 250MU, 500MU, 750Mu, 1000MU, 2000MU
  • In 1 or 2 arcs
  • 10 HN plans (6MV) were created with
  • 250MU, 500MU, 750Mu, 1000MU, 2000MU
  • In 1 or 2 arcs
  • 2 Gy/fx

5
G(3,3) vs. MUs
  • G(3,3) decreases as a function of MUs
  • Planning criteria MU lt 400 for 1/2 arcs

6
G(3,3) vs. accelerator
  • Differences between accelerators

7
Test plans used for QA
  • 6 of the test plans are use for QA 4 times a year
    each acc.
  • Plans with high G(3,3) are very stable (within
    2-4)

Low/moderate modulation
High modulation
8
Test plans used for QA
  • Some accelerators are more stable than others
  • Acc1 performs bad in autumn 2011 no problems
    with mashine QC

9
Acc QC vs. Patient spec QC
  • Problems with acc QC on acc 5 (spring 2011)
  • Not seen for patient specific QC

Low dose rate
DRMLC test
10
Real patient plans
  • Reproducibility for each acc
  • Difference between acc not seen with acc QC

acc3
11
True beam
  • 5 patients treated at Clinac and True beam
  • G(3,3) does not depend on Clinac/True beam?
  • MeanG(Clinac)98.4
  • MeanG(TrueBeam)99.0

12
Portal dosimetry
  • Use EPID/MVD for patient specific QC
  • Fast measurement
  • Ideal for routine measurements

13
Delta4 vs. PDI
  • Perform Delta4 and PDI measurement consecutively
    at same accelerator
  • Preliminary results, Oct-Dec 2011
  • 68 plans (1,2, ..6 arcs)
  • 127 single arcs
  • Single arcs
  • G(3,3)D4
  • 1.7 higher than G(3,3)PDI
  • Plans
  • G(3,3)D4
  • 1.0 higher than G(3,3)PDI
  • Pass criteria
  • G(3,3)D4 95 G(3,3)PDI 94

14
Work in Progress
  • Measurement of D4 and PDI for same plan at
    different accelerators
  • Analysis of data (approx 100 plans and 10 new
    plans pr week)
  • Workflow today
  • Daily PDI used for accept/reject
  • Weekly D4 used for check
  • Future
  • Only PDI
  • New/additional machine QC program

15
Machine QC program
  • MV imager
  • Test of clinical dose rates
  • Test of reverse gantry direction
  • Test of gantry position
  • Delta4
  • Still of measurement of 6 test plans 4xyear each
    accelerator
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com