Current%20Model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Current%20Model

Description:

Comparison with Experimental Results Model predictions compared with fluid film ... Pad Deformation Model Two existing ... approach is more ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: K2167
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Current%20Model


1
Current Model
Model is 2D. FIDAP equates force and moment on
the wafer surface and rotates the wafer into
equilibrium.
2
Comparison with Experimental Results
  • Model predictions compared with fluid film
    thickness and pitch angle results from Lu et al
    (2001)
  • Results on same order
  • Film thickness differs by constant of about 20 ?m
    - difference due to DELIF technique?
  • Angle of attack is on same order as
    experimentally measured value

42
Tufts University Dept. of Mechanical
Engineering MS Thesis Defense Oct 17, 2002
3
Adding Material Removal
  • A method to determine removal rate must be
    determined.
  • Possible models include
  • Modified Prestons law
  • Surface stress model
  • Abrasive and chemical wear model
  • Arbitrary user-defined model

4
RR Models
  • A modified Preston model is probably best.
  • Should provide flexibility for various problem
    types.
  • Easiest way to obtain removal rate on global
    scale.
  • Current research on Preston coefficients for CMP
    exists to some degree.
  • Options could become limited depending on the
    method used in FIDAP to implement removal rate of
    the wafer.

5
Current Work Computer Set-up
  • Current version of FIDAP (8.7) is not compatible
    with the existing models created in the earlier
    version FIDAP (8.52), although it should be.
  • Converting model databases and subroutines this
    month.
  • Currently trying to working with FIDAP technical
    support to remedy FORTRAN compiler issues on new
    university UNIX server.

6
Project Priorities Material Removal or Pad
Deformation?
  • Should we pursue pad deformation modeling in lieu
    of removal rate?
  • If pad deformation experimental envelope and
    simulations should be coordinated

7
Initial Strategies for Pad Deformation Model
  • Two existing FIDAP approaches
  • Model pad as a flexible thin film
    elasticity(vein wall example) boundary
    condition to fluid problem
  • Rigid body movement full model of pad
  • First approach is more compatible with previous
    modeling efforts
  • Currently running simpler test cases with
    standard FIDAP model while compiler problem is
    upgraded
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com