Lecture%20Outline - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture%20Outline

Description:

Lecture Outline Areas of Language Development Theories of Language Development Nativist Interactionist Language Development in Infancy/Childhood – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: AnneH169
Learn more at: http://people.uncw.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture%20Outline


1
  • Lecture Outline
  • Areas of Language Development
  • Theories of Language Development
  • Nativist
  • Interactionist
  • Language Development in Infancy/Childhood

2
  • Phonological Development
  • Acquisition of knowledge about the sound system
    of a language

3
  • Syntactic Development
  • Learning the rules for combining words in a
    language
  • Ex Englishmany rules related to word order

4
  • Semantic Development
  • Learning the system for expressing meaning in a
    language
  • Ex learning what words mean

5
  • Pragmatic Development
  • Acquiring knowledge about how language is used
    (cultural rules)
  • Ex turn-taking

6
  • Nativist Theories (Chomsky)
  • Language Acquisition Device (LAD) Innate set of
    rules common to all languages (universal grammar)
  • Unique to humans

7
  • Evidence Consistent with Nativist Theories
  • Children master language with little explicit
    training
  • Non-human primates require extensive training to
    master the most basic language skills
  • Although some non-human primates may combine
    symbols, dont show evidence of using syntax
    (rules)

8
  • Evidence (cont)
  • Certain areas of the brain appear to be
    specialized for language
  • Left hemisphere of cerebral cortex
  • Hemispheric specialization present in
    infancysuggests that innate biological factors
    are involved in language development

9
  • Evidence (cont)
  • Appears to be a critical period for language
    acquisition
  • Critical period Time during which language is
    easily acquired and after which language
    acquisition is more difficult and less successful
  • Suggests that innate biological factors are
    involved

10
  • Evidence for critical period
  • Brain damage more likely to result in permanent
    language impairment if it occurs in adulthood
    than in childhood

11
  • Less hemispheric specialization occurs when a
    second language is learned at 4 years or older
    than if learned earlier
  • Knowledge of grammar is related to the age at
    which individuals begin learning a second
    language, not the length of their exposure to the
    language
  • Individuals exposed earlier show greater
    knowledge

12
  • Evidence (cont)
  • Congenitally deaf children whose parents are not
    proficient in sign language
  • Develop larger vocabularies (gestures) than their
    parents
  • Spontaneously impose syntax (grammatical
    structure) when signing

13
  • Criticisms of Nativist Theories
  • Universal grammar common to all languages has not
    been identified
  • Focus on syntactic development and neglect other
    aspects of language development
  • Ignore role of social environment in language
    development

14
  • Interactionist Theories
  • Children are motivated to communicate with others
  • Children pay attention to clues available when
    language is used
  • Helps them to learn language

15
  • Evidence Consistent with Interactionist Theories
  • Children use a variety of strategies to learn the
    meaning of new words

16
  • Fast Mapping
  • Process of rapidly learning a new word when a
    familiar and unfamiliar word are contrasted
  • Ex chromium and red

17
  • Whole-Object Assumption
  • Expectation that a novel word refers to a whole
    object (rather than a part or other aspect of the
    object)
  • Ex Cat refers to whole cat, not its whiskers
    or other parts

18
  • Mutual Exclusivity Assumption
  • Expectation that a novel word applies to an
    unfamiliar object
  • Ex Show me the blicket

19
  • Linguistic Context
  • Grammatical form of a novel word influences
    childrens interpretation of it
  • Ex sibbing vs. a sib vs. some sib

20
  • Syntactic Bootstrapping
  • Inferring the meaning of a word based on the
    grammatical structure of the sentence in which it
    is used
  • Ex The duck is kradding the rabbit
  • OR
  • The duck and rabbit are kradding

21
  • Pragmatic Cues
  • Aspects of the social context that are used to
    infer the meaning of words
  • Direction of gaze
  • Intentionality

22
  • Criticisms of Interactionist Theories
  • The rules involved in language are too complex to
    be learned simply through paying attention to
    clues available in language
  • Especially true for syntactic development
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com