Julian M. Alston - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Julian M. Alston

Description:

Thoughts on Winners and Losers Julian M. Alston University of California, Davis Workshop on New Products and New Domestic and International Marketing Channels – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: IFP67
Category:
Tags: alston | julian | returns

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Julian M. Alston


1
Thoughts on Winners and Losers
  • Julian M. Alston
  • University of California, Davis
  • Workshop on New Products and New Domestic and
    International Marketing Channels
  • Sonoma Valley Inn
  • June 18-20, 2005

2
Australian Angles
  • Personal history Julians negative vibe . . .
  • Australian agricultural policy, 1975-2005
  • Victorian rural policy, 1980s and 1990s
  • (DARA, Marketing Branch, DITR Gippsland Blue)
  • Policies to revitalize rural communities and
    enhance rural incomes
  • Decentralization Small Towns Study
  • Diversification (agricultural/environmental
    tourism etc.)
  • New high value (or value added) products
  • What about comparative advantage? (Paul Cashin)
  • Value adding possibilities
  • Coal and iron ore Wool scouring
  • Value adding where? Why?
  • Bendigo (Ames)? Melbourne (Chicago)? or Tokyo?

3
Australian Angles (continued)
  • Economic policy for Rural and Regional Australia
  • John Freebairn, AJARE, 2003
  • The efficiency and equity aspects of policies
    affecting the quarter of Australians who live in
    rural and regional Australia (RARA) are reviewed.
  • For the most part it is argued that economy-wide
    policies rather than region or industry specific
    policies are appropriate.
  • Progressive income taxation, means-tested social
    security payments, and government funded
    education, health and other services directly and
    efficiently redistribute to support equity.
  • Subsidies for particular industries in RARA, such
    as dairy, and input subsidies targeted at RARA,
    such as community service obligations,
    misallocate resources and are ineffective in
    meeting equity goals.
  • Better property rights and procedures for
    allocating most natural resources, especially
    water, are necessary.

4
Jurisdictions, Targets, Instruments
  • What is the problem?
  • Rural poverty
  • Decline of small towns and loss of infrastructure
  • National security
  • Wasted Opportunities?
  • National public goods
  • State or local public goods
  • Industry collective goods
  • Private goods with synergies?
  • Appropriate Action?
  • Federal, state, or local government action
  • Institutional change to facilitate private
    individual or collective action

5
The subliminal message
  • Alternative mechanisms for product innovation
  • Invisible hand?
  • Invisible handshake?
  • Oligopoly
  • Invisible handout?
  • Government subsidy
  • Marketing order privilege
  • Other privileges

6
Types of Innovation
  • Has implications for total benefits and their
    distribution
  • Brand creation and promotion
  • Canadian lamb Many California examples
  • Grading
  • Napa Valley Cabernet (vs California Table Wine)
  • I-80 Beef?
  • New product innovation
  • Kiwi fruit? Shiraz?
  • Process innovation
  • Bag lettuce
  • Marketing innovations may involve more than one
    type, and may require institutional innovation as
    well

7
Winners and Losers from Value-Added
  • For producers to benefit from demand enhancement
  • Must increase average revenue . . . .which means
    either increase price for every unit of a
    homogeneous product or differentiate product
  • Must increase average revenue by more than the
    increase in average costs associated with the
    program

8
Privately Profitable Tax-Funded Promotion
Price
S0
P2
P1
P2-t
P0
D1
D0
0
Q2
Q0
Q1
Quantity
9
Winners and Losers from Value-Added
  • The Returns to Generic Promotion by a Producer
    Cooperative in a Small Open Economy
  • (Alston 1994 Hayes 1993)
  • Most countries, let alone states or counties, are
    small in most agricultural commodities
  • Profitable promotion (or other demand
    enhancement) is enabled by government
    intervention (e.g., dairy policy)

10
Consumer and Producer Welfare Effects of
Promotion in a Small, Open Economy
11
Rent Sharing and Rent Dissipation
  • General problem with collective action programs
  • How to create rents?
  • probably need help from the government
  • How to distribute rents without dissipating them?
  • probably need help from the government
  • Mechanisms?
  • Individual rights
  • Pooling arrangements

12
Who Benefits
  • Land Owners
  • If access based on Geographic Indicators (e.g.,
    Napa)
  • Rights to use Brand
  • If access based on membership of club
  • Other Specialized Factor
  • Skill
  • Trade Secrets (or other IPR)

13
Models of who benefits from marketing innovation
  • New Uses Alston and Beach
  • Ethanol from corn
  • New Products
  • Alston and Mullen
  • Large-Lean Lamb
  • Lence and Hayes
  • GM crops
  • Natural meat
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com