Testing Biota Dose Assessment Committee Methodology with 1997 Hanford Surveillance Data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Testing Biota Dose Assessment Committee Methodology with 1997 Hanford Surveillance Data

Description:

Testing Biota Dose Assessment Committee Methodology with 1997 Hanford Surveillance Data August 1999 by E. Antonio (PNNL) and J. P. Lair (TRP) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: TAI120
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Testing Biota Dose Assessment Committee Methodology with 1997 Hanford Surveillance Data


1
Testing Biota Dose Assessment Committee
Methodology with 1997 Hanford Surveillance Data
August 1999
  • by
  • E. Antonio (PNNL)
  • and
  • J. P. Lair (TRP)

2
Purpose
  • Test the DOE BDAC Methodology using Published
    Hanford Surveillance Data

3
Scope
  • Data Published in Hanford Site Environmental
    Surveillance Data 1997 (Bisping, 1998)
  • Data was previously released, - should have No
    Surprises with compliance issues

4
Methods
  • Soil, Sediment and Surface Water Data Queried
    from Surveillance Database
  • Hanford Site Maximum Concentrations Determined
    and Compared to DCGs
  • For Sum of Fractions Which Exceeded One, Location
    Specific Analysis
  • Data Further Broken Down by Geographic Location
    for Analysis

5
Soil Results Sum of Fractions 0.137
6
Sediment Results Sum Of Fractions 2.59E-4
7
Water Results Sum of Fractions 11
8
Water Results for 100-N Area Sum of Fractions
11
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
  • Spatial Considerations
  • Maximum Sr-90 concentration in 100-N Spring water
    measured at 9,900 pCi/L
  • Maximum Sr-90 concentration in River Water,
    collected near the 100-N spring (1 meter from
    shoreline, 30 cm depth) was 13 pCi/L
  • Assuming a straight line dilution, the DCG
    concentration is reached 0.09 m(3.5 inches) from
    the point where the spring water enters the
    Columbia River
  • Because of the relatively small spatial extent of
    the contamination occurring at the100-N Area,
    there should be no substantial risk to aquatic
    biota populations of the Hanford Reach of the
    Columbia River

12
  • Temporal Considerations
  • From field observations, river bank springs are
    only exposed approximately
  • 15 of the year, for the remainder, they are
    either not flowing or are underwater
  • 100-N Springs flow rate estimated at 43 L/min
  • 1997 average daily flow rate of the Columbia
    River approximated at 287 million L/min
  • No substantial community of aquatic organisms can
    exist in the undiluted springwater for an entire
    year

13
218-W-4B Trench Data
  • From Napier 1981

14
Presentation using Site 218-W-4B (Trenches) data
Nuclide Curies pCi/g Co60 1400 14000 Sr90 280
2800 Cs137 310 3100 Th232 .061 .61 U233 74
750 U234 2.6 26 U235 .079 .79 U238 1.9 19
Pu238 68 680 Pu239 3000 30000 Pu240 760 7600
Pu241 9200 92000 Pu242 .27 2.8 Am214 2.1 2
2
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Original Terrestrial Animal Parameter Worksheet
18
(No Transcript)
19
Modified (1st Modification) Terrestrial Animal
Worksheet
20
(No Transcript)
21
Modified (2nd Modification) Terrestrial Animal
Worksheet
22
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com