www.psywar.org - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

www.psywar.org

Description:

www.psywar.org World War I III. The Homefront A. Economic Mobilization 1. Financing the War Liberty Bonds Taxes World War I III. The Homefront A. Economic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: HPAuthor413
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: www.psywar.org


1
(No Transcript)
2
  • www.psywar.org

3
(No Transcript)
4
World War I
  • III. The Homefront
  • A. Economic Mobilization
  • 1. Financing the War
  • Liberty Bonds
  • Taxes

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
World War I
  • III. The Homefront
  • A. Economic Mobilization
  • 2. Organizing the Economy (war boards)
  • a. War Industries Board
  • Bernard Baruch
  • b. Food Administration
  • Herbert Hoover
  • Volunteerism Conserve
  • Victory Gardens, wheatless Wednesdays
    meatless Tuesdays
  • c. Fuel Administration
  • heatless Mondays gasless Sundays
  • d. National War Labor Board
  • William Howard Taft
  • Resolve Labor disputes
  • 8 hr. day, wages rise, union members increase
  • Workers not strike employers not lockout
  • Ludlow Massacre

8
(No Transcript)
9
World War I
  • III. The Homefront
  • A. Economic Mobilization
  • 3. Economic Social Results
  • a. African Americans
  • Great Migration
  • Race Riots
  • b. Women

10
World War I
  • III. The Homefront
  • B. War Propaganda
  • 1. Committee of Public Info./George Creel
  • 2. Forms of Propaganda
  • 3. Results

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
World War I
  • III. The Homefront
  • C. Civil Liberties Repressing Dissent
  • 1. Espionage Act (1917)
  • 2. Sedition Act (1918)
  • 3. patriotic organizations
  • 4. 100 Percent Americanism

16
Civil Liberty Cases
  • The Espionage Act, passed in 1917, made it a
    crime to obstruct military recruitment and it
    authorized the Postmaster General to deny mailing
    privileges to any material he considered
    treasonous or harmful to the war effort.
  • The Sedition Act, passed in 1918, made it illegal
    to utter, print, write or publish any disloyal,
    profane, scurrilous or abusive language about
    the government, the Constitution, the flag, the
    armed forces or even the uniform of the Army or
    Navy.
  • Case 1 The American Revolution Movie (U.S. v.
    Spirit of 76)
  • A Hollywood movie producer issued a film, The
    Spirit of 76, which portrayed some scenes in
    which British soldiers committed some
    atrocities.Claiming that the film questioned the
    faith of our ally, Great Britain, the prosecution
    argued that the war effort demanded total Allied
    support.
  • Guilty or Not Guilty?
  • Sentence/Fine
  • Case 2 The Anti-Draft Circulars (Schenck v.
    U.S.)
  • An American Socialist, feeling that American
    involvement in World War I was an attempt to
    bolster the capitalist system, mailed circulars
    to men eligible for the draft, stating that being
    conscripted against ones will was
    unconstitutional and should be resisted.The
    prosecution argued that this interfered with the
    governments right to raise an army in time of
    war.
  • Guilty or Not Guilty?
  • Sentence/Fine
  • Case 3 The Leaflets Dropped From a Window
    (Abrams v. U.S.)
  • Several men, concerned about Americas
    involvement in the unfolding Bolshevik Revolution
    in Russia, dropped some leaflets from a window to
    pedestrians below.The leaflets urged that
    American workers go on strike to protest
    Americas involvement in another nations civil
    war.The prosecution argued that while the
    leaflets made no statement about the U.S.s role
    in World War or its allies, a strike might hamper
    war production and thus their actions were
    illegal.
  • Guilty or Not Guilty?
  • Sentence/Fine
  • Case 4 The Anti-Draft Speech (U.S. v. Debs)

17
Civil Liberty Cases
  • Case 1 The American Revolution Movie
  • U.S. v. Spirit of 76 The producer was fined
    10,000 and given a 10-year prison sentence
    (later commuted to three years).
  • Case 2 The Anti-Draft Circulars
  • Schenck v. U.S. A 10-year sentence upheld by the
    Supreme Court, which established the clear and
    present danger doctrine for the boundaries of
    permissible speech.
  • Case 3 The Leaflets Dropped From a Window
  • Abrams v. U.S. A 20-year sentence upheld by the
    Supreme Court.Abrams was later released from
    prison on the condition that he emigrate to the
    Soviet Union.
  • Case 4 The Anti-Draft Speech
  • U.S. v. Debs 10-year sentence commuted by
    President Harding in 1921.
  • This comes from Mr. Feldmeth http//www.polytech
    nic.org/faculty/gfeldmeth/USHistory.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com