School Improvement and Educational Accountability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

School Improvement and Educational Accountability

Description:

School Improvement and Educational Accountability M. David Miller University of Florida – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:486
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: mdm89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: School Improvement and Educational Accountability


1
School Improvement and Educational Accountability
  • M. David Miller
  • University of Florida

2
  • A major shortcoming of current
  • accountability systems for purposes of making
    valid inferences about school quality is due to
    severe limitations on the data that are generally
    included in systems (Linn, 2007)

3
  • The growing consensus is that in the era of
    standards based reform, a major missing piece of
    the puzzle is data. Every state must quickly
    develop a robust system of student data and
    information that allows us to not only report on
    assessment data for state and NCLB accountability
    purposes, but to use those data for diagnostic
    and instructional decision making (Wilhoit,
    2006)

4
Accountability Systems and Multiple Uses
  • NCLB / AYP
  • Individual Uses
  • Diagnostic/ Instructional
  • Graduation
  • Retention/Promotion
  • Course Credit

5
School Use of Assessments
  • Designs for School (e.g., matrix sampling)
  • fewer items per student
  • broader coverage
  • noncomparable student level scores
  • reduced testing time

6
Diagnostic Testing
  • Student v Group level
  • Level of scores - Subscores v Benchmark
  • Reliability
  • Validity

7
Florida Content Focus Clusters
Content Area Content Focus Cluster
Reading Words and phrases in context Main idea, plot, and purpose Comparisons and cause/effect Reference and research
Mathematics Number sense, concepts and operations Measurement Geometry and spatial sense Algebraic thinking Data analysis and probability
Science Physical and chemical sciences Earth and Space sciences Life and environmental sciences Scientific thinking
8
Spearman-Brown projected subscore reliabilities
Subscores ?.85 ?.90 ?.95
3 .65 .75 .86
4 .59 .69 .83
5 .53 .64 .79
9
Reading benchmarks Main idea, plot, and purpose
  • Chronological order
  • Details and Facts
  • Authors Purpose
  • Character Development
  • Plot Development

10
Mathematics benchmarks Algebraic Thinking
  • Functions
  • Graphic Patterns
  • Linear Equations
  • Solving Equations
  • Equations
  • Inequalities
  • Solving Inequalities
  • Solving Equations
  • Translating Inequalities

11
Science benchmarks Scientific Thinking
  • Experimental Design
  • Drawing Conclusions
  • Observation
  • Communicating Results
  • Understanding Models
  • Predictable Events
  • Using Machines
  • Problem Solving
  • Scientific Applications

12
Spearman-Brown projected benchmark reliabilities
Benchmarks ?.85 ?.90 ?.95
15 .27 .36 .56
25 .18 .26 .43
40 .12 .18 .32
13
Spearman-Brown projected factors for test length
with benchmark reliabilities.70
Benchmarks ?.85 ?.90 ?.95
15 6.31 3.81 1.83
25 10.63 6.64 3.09
40 17.11 10.63 4.96
14
Diagnostic Validity and Test Construction
  • Adding items that fit overall test blueprint and
    information function
  • Dropping items that do not fit overall test

15
Additional Indicators to Interpret Accountability
Data (Conditions of Education)
  • Participation
  • Student Effort and Progress
  • student attitudes and aspirations
  • student effort absenteeism
  • Contexts of Education
  • course taking and standards
  • learning opportunities
  • special programs
  • teachers
  • school characteristics and climate

16
Successful and Unsuccessful Schools
  • In current accountability systems, student intake
    and instructional effectiveness are confounded to
    some unknown degree, calling into question any
    inferences about school effectiveness from these
    data (Raudenbush, 2004)

17
Summary
  • More information needed to understand causes of
    success or lack of success
  • Value-added adjustments?
  • Diagnostic information reasonable in this context
    given issues of reliability and validity ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com