Integrating Trust and Driver - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Integrating Trust and Driver

Description:

Integrating Trust and Driver s Safety By Robin Mitchell – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Robin319
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Integrating Trust and Driver


1
Integrating Trust and Drivers Safety
  • By Robin Mitchell

2
Components of Focus Area
  • Improving driving safety through the use of in
    vehicle warning devices
  • Trust in automation

3
Automotive Warning Devices
  • Designed to help alert the driver to potentially
    dangerous driving situations
  • Currently, there are several
  • Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC)
  • Forward Collision Warning (FCW)

4
Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC)
  • Uses radar and laser range sensors to detect
    vehicles ahead of the driver and adjusts the
    vehicles speed to maintain a minimum headway
    with the other vehicles
  • Able to control the engine, power train, and/or
    the service breaks

5
Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC)
  • Maintains both set speed and headway
  • Is able to control both these settings for the
    vehicle and adapt them to the current driving
    situation

6
Forward Collision Warning (FCW)
  • Uses the same sensors as ACC to assess collision
    potential and warn the driver of emerging
    collision situations
  • Helps the driver to avoid striking the rear end
    of another vehicle

7
Combined Use of ACC and FCW
  • Improve ability to avoid collisions by helping
    the driver to maintain safe speeds and headways
  • Conveyed through visual, auditory, and tactile
    cues
  • Helps refocus driver attention when it is
    diverted to another place

8
Example of ACC and FCW
  • If ACC detects a slower or stopped vehicle, it
    will create an alert
  • If the driver does nothing, this would cause the
    FCW to also alert (as a forward collision would
    be imminent)
  • It is up to the driver to react to the warnings

9
Change in Driving Tasks
  • Changes driver tasks by taking some control from
    the driver
  • Creates different tasks for the driver to perform
  • The driver relies on the automation to determine
    the safety of the situation

10
Trust Defined
  • Generally it is an attitude towards technology
    regarding expected performance
  • Most widely used definition comes from Mayer,
    Davis, and Schoorman, 1995
  • the willingness of a party to be vulnerable to
    the actions of another party based on the
    expectation that the other will perform a
    particular action important to the trustor,
    irrespective of the ability to monitor or control
    that party

11
Characteristics that govern Trust
  • Ability the group of skills, competencies, and
    characteristics that enable the agent to
    influence the domain.
  • Similar to predictability
  • Integrity degree to which the agent follows a
    set of principles
  • Similar to dependability
  • Benevolence the extent to which the motivations
    of the agent are aligned with those of the
    trustor
  • Working towards a common goal

12
Trust is dependant on 3 dimensions
  • Performance
  • Process
  • Purpose of Automation
  • Definitions from Trust in Technology
    Designing for Appropriate
  • Reliance by John Lee and Katrina
    See

13
Performance
  • The competency or perceived expertise of the
    automation as demonstrated by its ability to
    achieve the operators goals
  • In other words, will it do what I want it to do
  • Trust will increase when the automation performs
    to expectations

14
Process
  • The degree to which the algorithms of the
    automation adhere to the operators understanding
    of how the automation works
  • In other words, does it work like I think it
    should work in this situation
  • Trust will increase if the algorithms used are
    appropriate for the current situation

15
Purpose of Automation
  • The degree to which the automation is being used
    within the realm of the designers intent
  • In other words, is it being used in the manner
    for which it was designed
  • This is often based on if the designers intent
    has been properly communicated to the operator
  • Trust will increase when the automation performs
    as intended

16
Trust based on Use
  • Trust is largely based on observation
  • If a system is not trusted, it will not be
    usedtrust will not grow
  • The more the automation is used, the more trust
    will be facilitated in the system
  • Highly trusted automation is monitored less
    frequently

17
Trusting ACC and FCW
  • ACC and FCW are emerging technologies with the
    possibility of improving driving safety
  • Drivers need to trust these automations and use
    them appropriately
  • An important concept not yet investigated

18
Proposed Research
  • Investigate the degree of trust a driver places
    in these devices
  • Test ACC and FCW individually
  • Test ACC and FCW together
  • Examine the differences in driver trust across
    conditions

19
Integrating Trust and Drivers Safety
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com