Title: The Dynamics of Unity and Diversity in Southeast Asia: Lessons Learned?
1The Dynamics of Unity and Diversity in Southeast
Asia Lessons Learned?
2Borders in Southeast Asia by the Early 19th
Century
- The Mainland and the Island Areas
3Bhinekka Tunggal Ika Out of Many, One
- History of the region has been conceptualized by
scholars and politicians in linear fashion,
moving from many disparate groups into a unity - Precolonial (including early modern) histories
thus perceived as divided/divisive (primitive),
and colonial and modern periods as
united/unifying (progressive) - This form of structuring ideas of Southeast Asia
has been determined by scholars influenced by the
relative wealth of materials from the colonial
and modern nation state archives - Evidence suggests that this heuristic division
masks the reality of an oscillation between unity
(state-sponsored programs) and diversity (local
responses) from the past to the present
4Rescuing History from the Nation-State
- Prasenjit Duaras call (1997) to rescue history
from the nation-state focused on China, arguing
that China was more than the dynasties,
emphasis on regions - Vietnam often thought of as the oldest and most
stable state in Southeast Asian history
historians continue to talk of the thousand
years under the Chinese, followed by the long
history of Vietnamese independent regimes - Increasing studies on the Chams of central and
southern Vietnam, and on the uplands in northern
Vietnam expose the contested spaces and the
presence of Vietnams - Transnational links of Vietnam and littoral
societies shown in new research using a sea
perspective, undermining state vision of unity,
continuity, and history as determined by the land
5VIETNAM
6Sea Perspective on Vietnam
- Li Tana The Eighteenth Century Mekong Delta and
its World of Water Frontier. In Nhung Tuyet Tran
and Anthony Reid, eds. Viet Nam Borderless
Histories. Madison University of Wisconsin
Press, 2006. - Wheeler, Charles. Rethinking the Sea in
Vietnamese History Littoral Society in the
Integration of Thaun-Quang, Seventeenth-Eighteenth
Centuries. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
37, 1(2006)123-55
7Adopting Local Perspectives
- Island Southeast Asia characterized by
nation-states that had origins in colonial
entities whereas, mainland Southeast Asia had
kingdoms by early twentieth century that had
distinct boundaries prior to colonialism - The land- and seascape of island Southeast Asia
and the persistence of many and diverse
communities spawned various theories of the
nature of the state - Mainland Southeast Asian states tend to follow a
linear historical discussion How did we get to
where we are? - All of Southeast Asia shared ideas of authority
flowing from a source of spiritual strength
rulers had most power/authority while local
leaders had less
8Authority/Power in Southeast Asia
- Women of Prowess
- Shakti (Hindu) Java, Sumatra
- Pon (Buddhist) with local variations Theravada
Buddhist countries - Barakka or Berkat (Islamic) archipelago
- Bertuah (Malay) archipelago
- Mana Polynesian
- Both diversity and unity in Southeast Asia
revolve around these people of prowess
9Mandala Polity
- Mandala (O.W. Wolters) idea of polities under
man of prowess, whose authority/influence is
likened to the beam of an upturned lamp most
intense in the center, gradually weakens toward
the periphery permeable frontiers dynamism of
peripheries because of overlap with other mandala
polities - Foreign ideas fragmented into local cultural
statements in process called localization - Idea continues into present at both national
(unity) and local (diversity) levels in
political, religious, business, etc., leaders
10Galactic and Solar Polities
- Galactic polity (S. Tambiah) likened to a galaxy
with a sun that holds a number of planets within
its orbit, with the gravitational pull weaker the
farther away from the sun - Solar polity (V. Lieberman) is a refinement on
galactic polity in emphasizing that each planet
replicates the sun with its own moons, like the
solar system
11Kingdom of Words
- Jane Drakard, using Minangkabau in central
Sumatra as model of a kingdom of words - Minangkabau had kings from 14th to 19th
centuries, yet had no armies, no administrative
apparatus, only reputation - Ability to influence and hence govern activities
of the Minangkabau people based on cultural
acceptance of the ruler as one possessing great
spiritual powers association of first ruler with
Tantric bodhisattva Amoghapasa - Manifestation of power in letters sent to
Minangkabau living abroad (rantau) with preamble
detailing the sacred genealogy and powers of the
ruler - Power conveyed both orally and in the missive
containing the written word with special seals - Letters carried by special emissaries seen to be
bearers of the sacred powers of the rulers to
Minangkabau in rantau proved higly effective in
organizing trade and community abroad
12MINANGKABAU
13ADITYAVARMAN (mid-14th century), as Tantric
Bodhisattva Amoghapasa
Jakarta Museum
14Negara The Theatre State
- Clifford Geertz uses nineteenth century Bali as
model for understanding polities as theatre - Idea of the exemplary center, where court and
capital represent both the microcosm of the
universe and the center of political order - Competing dadias (agnatic descendants of a common
ancestor) threaten unity, hence need for regular
ceremonies and rituals by center to maintain
unity - Such ceremonies and rituals affirm kings role as
center of the world, while providing arena for
rival dadia to demonstrate their loyalty to
ruler, thus alleviating tensions - Geertz These pageants constitute important
features of the state they are the state.
15Sources
- Wolters, O.W. History, Culture, and Region in
Southeast Asian Perspectives. Revised Edition,
Ithaca Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 1999
1982. - Tambiah, Stanley. The Galactic Polity The
Structure of Traditional Kings in Southeast
Asia. Annals of the New York Academy of Science
293 (15 July 1977), 69-97. - Victor Lieberman. Strange Parallels, vol. 1.
Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 2003. - Drakard, Jane. A Kingdom of Words Language and
Power in Sumatra. Kuala Lumpur Oxford
University Press, 2000. - Geertz, Clifford. Negara The Theatre State in
Nineteenth Century Bali. Princeton Princeton
University Press, 1980.
16Features of Diversity
- Various ideas of state reflect differing cultural
responses to external influences they exhibit
dynamic absorption of external ideas and
reformulated into new local concepts - A strong motivating factor of localization is the
need to harness the unknown force for benefit of
community - In precolonial Southeast Asia the diversity of
forms of polity reflects the varied responses of
community based on cultural ideas, the
environment, and human agency
17Continuity in Colonial and Modern Southeast Asian
States
- Colonial regimes created the outlines of nations
in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Burma rest
followed outlines of nations already established
prior to the introduction of colonialism - Southeast Asian states continue to be plagued by
internal dissensions based on religious and/or
ethnic differences hence the need for ongoing
measures to maintain these unities through
various means - Forms of unifying measures invention of
tradition in sense of selecting common
experiences to create bond (revolutionary
struggle against colonialism) histories,
schools, national language, ceremonies - Yet the ongoing need for such measures
demonstrates the persistence of the local factors
18Diversities
- Anti-state groups (James C. Scott, The Art of Not
Being Governed, 2010) view that marginal groups
deliberately seek escape from state in periphery
perceived by center as outside the law or
outside civilization - Despite emphasis on a linear evolution into
centralized polities, family or kinship
alliances, is more typical of Southeast Asia with
focus on personal following (cacique democracy) - Anthony Day. Ties that (Un)Bind Families and
States in Premodern Southeast Asia, Journal of
Asian Studies55, 2 (May 1996), 384-409
19Strength of Precolonial Features in the Modern
Period
- Dominant religions in Southeast Asian countries
(Islam, Theravada Buddhism, Christianity) are all
facing challenges from the new religions - In Theravada Buddhism, efforts by the
state-sanctioned sangha authority to standardize
practices largely ignored persistence of
saints (women of prowess) in daily practice - In Islam, strength of local Sufi brotherhoods led
by individual leaders
20Dynamics of Kinship Networks and States in
Southeast Asia-1
- History of region is a record of the ongoing
movement between powerful and extensive kinship
networks forming states (unity), and their
subsequent loss of power to other contending
networks, becoming then the factions
(diversity) - Rivalry of kinship networks was the stimulus for
localization of external forces (e.g. Indic,
Islamic, Sinic, Christian ideas of kingship) to
gain advantage through reformulated ideas of
power - Emphasis on family relationships (of blood,
marriage, compadrazgo, milk siblings, ancestors,
and spirits) and hierarchy
21Dynamics of Kinship Networks and States in
Southeast Asia-2
- World religions and colonialism have strengthened
hierarchy and patriarchal tendencies - Yet, on the ground, proliferation of women
mediums, spiritual groups, new religions in
continuance of people of prowess idea - Gendered concepts in Southeast Asia based on
ideas of world as divided into two basic
patterns male and female challenged today by
modern ideas of sexuality, creating more
possibilities
22In the Age of the Internet
- Benedict Anderson in his Imagined Communities
(1983) never imagined a vitual community - Internet has dismantled political boundaries by
both expanding and contracting their borders - Result has been greater participation and
influence in the political (in broad sense)
process Orang Asli as part of world-wide
indigenous communities Sufi brotherhoods as part
of a world-wide ummah or local ethnic community
like-minded individuals battling in the
blogosphere against state domination
23Lessons Learned?
- Fill in the blanks (please use black ink)