CPHA Preventing Cervical Cancer- Making it Happen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

CPHA Preventing Cervical Cancer- Making it Happen

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: Government Employee Last modified by: O'Keefe, Cathy Created Date: 10/4/2006 4:43:36 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Govern85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CPHA Preventing Cervical Cancer- Making it Happen


1
CPHAPreventing Cervical Cancer- Making it Happen
  • Cathy OKeefe
  • Gillian Butler
  • May 29, 2014

2
Disclosures
  • Disclosures
  • I have no financial interests to disclose

3
Acknowledgements
  • Gillian Butler, CDC Nurse Specialist, GNL
  • Peggy Allan, CDC Nurse, Western Health
  • Hayley Cooze, CDC Nurse, Central Health
  • The dedicated Public Health Nurses in NL who take
    ownership to make sure every child is immunized

4
Outline for May 29
  • Provide an overview of the first six years of the
    HPV female immunization program in NL
  • Discuss the research available regarding herd
    immunity with HPV programs
  • Describe current practice for informed consent
    and administration

5
Outline continued
  • Compare coverage rates with other provinces and
    countries
  • Discuss the need, or not, for evaluation and
    program expansion

6
Newfoundland and Labrador
7
What do you think ?
  • Best age for HPV vaccine
  • Consent no consent
  • Females and males
  • Catch-up for males
  • Best way to optimize uptake

8
NACI recommendations
  • NACI initial statement February 2007
  • Prevent cervical cancers caused by HPV infection
  • NACI statement updated in 2012
  • HPV4 (Gardasil) is recommended in males between
    9 and 26 years of age for the prevention of anal
    intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) grades 1, 2, and
    3, anal cancer, and anogenital warts (NACI
    Recommendation Grade A). NACI has determined that
    there is good (Grade A) evidence to recommend the
    use of Gardasil in males between 9 to 26 years
    of age.
  • To date PEI and Alberta have announced programs
    for males

9
Research
  • The impact of vaccinating males, compared to that
    of improving vaccination uptake in existing
    female cohorts or vaccinating additional female
    cohorts.
  • Inclusion of males in routine programs
    facilitates vaccination of males at a young age
    when the potential benefit of the vaccine is
    greatest.
  • There are no studies that directly demonstrate
    that HPV vaccination of males will result in less
    sexual transmission of vaccine-related HPV types
    from males to females and in reduced incidence of
    cervical cancer.
  • While current models predict that addition of
    males to a routine HPV vaccination program would
    prevent additional cases of genital warts and
    cervical cancer among females to varying degrees,
  • Provinces and territories will need to compare
    the impact of vaccinating males with that of
    vaccinating additional female cohorts.
  • While not directly comparable, lessons learned
    from gender-targeting e.g. rubella vaccine

10
Getting started
  • 21 March 2007
  • Canadian Cancer Society Applauds Funding for HPV
    Vaccine Announced in Federal Budget
  • TORONTO - The Canadian Cancer Society applauds
    the federal budget announcement of 300 million
    to help implement the HPV vaccine across Canada.
    The vaccine will help protect young women and
    girls from cervical cancer.

11
Choosing a cohort
  • Jurisdictions have approached the age to provide
    immunization in different ways
  • The NACI statement keeps the range broad
  • NL decision made by looking at varied factors

12
Getting the best coverage
  • NL factors for choosing a cohort
  • Age of initiation of sexual activity
  • Impact of school size and class attendance
  • Duration of protection
  • Ongoing surveillance and connection with cancer
    registry

13
Regional Participation
  • The key component of making this work is
    collaboration with Regional Health Authorities in
    planning
  • Some of the questions- What works best
  • Grade - Age
  • Timing - Involving teachers
  • Materials for parents and teachers
  • PH Nurse training
  • Should we involve media

14
NL The process 2007
  • Fall 2006 Communicable Disease Nurses and
    Regional Medical Officers of Health were provided
    scientific information on HPV infection and
    vaccine
  • Once NACI announced
  • managers had heard that implementation was most
    likely going to be fall 2008, but nevertheless
    did pass this info on to lower level managers who
    had been asked to work out the logistics...
  • so when the announcement was made, there was
    little difficulty mobilizing because much of the
    work was done

15
HPV NL Implementation August September 2007
  • Policy developedMaterials Education for health
    professionals Informed consent Fact sheet to
    facilitate consent Post immunization fact
    sheet Information package for teachers
  • Flexibility in regions for operationalization

16
Consent
17
Implementation
  • PH Nurses in-service on science and responding to
    parental concerns
  • Materials printed
  • Policies revised and distributed
  • Work with Department of Education to develop an
    information package for school boards and
    teachers on HPV program
  • Regions provided with vaccine, materials for
    education

18
Adding another Cohort
  • As many of the PT came on board and costs reduced
    the key was to ensure equitable use of all the
    NIS trust funding
  • Add cohort grade 9 for 2 years
  • Already completing a consent for Tdap
  • Not covered in 08-09 by the grade 6 program
  • 2 years
  • Result 90 of females born 1994 and after have
    been immunized

19
Challenges at Regional level
  • Hiring nurses on a casual basis
  • Remote communities covering several cohorts
  • Public vs. private access
  • HPV not reportable

20
Uptake First 3 years
21
2007-2010
22
Reaching the goal
23
Why this works
  • All post natal referrals in this region are sent
    to PH nurses for follow-up.
  • PH nurses use this opportunity to provide an
    appointment for child health clinics. The first
    vaccinations are at 8 weeks, two weeks later than
    the doctors the 6 week appointment.
  • Also since the parent is called and an
    appointment is provided for immunization, the
    parent is made to feel it is important to have
    vaccines.
  • All school based immunization programs are
    completed by PH nurses allowing physicians to
    work toward their scope of practice.

24
Why this works
  • Single service provision of Childhood
    immunization Program
  • Only one group responsible for provision of this
    service
  • Public Health Nurses cover all communities
  • Clear lines of communication for issues that
    arise
  • They are directed and follow provincial policies
    and procedures.
  • Have our immunization manuals to follow so there
    are clear consistent messages
  • Strong support from provincial office prompt
    response to concerns that arise

25
Why this works
  • Issues and concerns were dealt with promptly.
    PHNs fell their work is valued and they take
    ownership of the immunization program.
  • Vaccine products are changing continuously
  • PHNs are immediately educated about any program
    changes or changes to vaccine product
  • Written materials such as tear off sheets are
    provided promptly as well as product information
  • Semi-monthly Public Health memo send from the
    CDCN keeps the PH nurses abreast of changes

26
What do you think?
  • Revisit our questions and reflect on how this
    could work in your jurisdiction

27
Opportunities
  • Linking immunization records to the cancer
    registry
  • HPV monitoring and Surveillance Committee
  • Reviewing policy related to immunizing males

28
Discussion Questions
29
References
  • CCDR NACI 2007 2012
  • Rosberger, Perez King, Franco Oncology exchange
    May 2013 Vol 12 No 2
  • Tabrizi, Brotherton, Kaldor, Cummins, Lui Journal
    of Infectious Diseases 2012206
  • Brotherton, Fridman The Lancet 2011
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com