Title: Local and Regional Governance: Experience of Capacity Building Program in Indonesia
1Local and Regional Governance Experience of
Capacity Building Program in Indonesia
Presentation Document
Yayasan Inovasi Pemerintahan Daerah / Center for
Local Government Innovation
Washington-DC, June 19, 2006
2Indonesia Entering Democratic Era
3The Big Bang in Autonomy and Decentralization
- After having had a highly centralized government
system for more than 30 years, Indonesia
through Law No. 22 Year 1999 on Regional
Government chose a rather radical (BIG BANG)
approach to decentralization. - BIG BANG No gradual transfer of
responsibilities to sub-national levels of
government, but acknowledgement of general
competence on Regency (Kabupation) or
Municipality (Kota) level only functions of
Central Government and Provinces are listed
(Government Regulation (PP) No. 25 Year 2000),
residual functions are with Regency/Municipality. - Sub-national (Regency/Municipality) has full
autonomy which include planning, budgeting,
implementing, evaluating all of development at
their levels.
4Chances and Risks of Decentralization
- Chances for more democracy and accountability,
better services, more equitable development. - Risks of dominant local elites, decentralized
corruption, service failures, regionalism
5Institutional and Personnel Capacities Problems
- Based on stipulation of Law 22/1999, all central
government organizations in the regions (Kanwil,
Kandep) and their personnel (altogether more than
2 million) were transferred to the authority of
the regions in 2001. - Law 22/1999 gave regions substantial authority
for the management of their civil service, partly
in contradiction to the civil service law (Law
No. 43 Year 1999), which retained much control at
the central level. - Consequences In aggregate, regions avail of the
necessary institutional set-up and sufficient
number of personnel to cope with their new
duties, however - - some regions are overstaffed and others lack
personnel - - qualification of staff is often not in line
with requirements
6However, decentralization and autonomy in
Indonesia gave some prospect
- Decentralization and strong local governments
have become irreversible assets of Indonesias
government system - Decentralization has broad support in Indonesias
society - Decentralization has good prospects to achieve
its goals if requirements to reduce risks are
more forcefully fulfilled, and if - - a comprehensive civil service reform is
undertaken - - more effective reforms of the judiciary are
carried out to provide for more legal certainty
and fight corruption - - consistent efforts are undertaken to
strengthen civil society and give it an
appropriate role in the governance system
7In regard to oil, gas, and mining,
decentralization and autonomy in Indonesia gave
more chances..
- Based on government regulation (PP) No. 75 Year
2001, there are clearly sifted of authority from
central government to sub-national level,
especially in regard to certification of
authority to start oil, gas, and mining
businesses. - There are three different certification of
authority, such as - - certification letter to make study or
research - - certification letter given to the community to
do small scale community mining - - certification letter given to qualified and
professional oil, gas, and mining company
8Experiences in LG Capacity Building
9To conduct needs assessment, YIPD/CLGI
categorized issues into three dimensions
Dimension
Examples
Competency Related Issues
- General management skills, e.g. leadership,
decision-making - Financial management skills, e.g performance
budgeting, financial reporting - Technical skills, e.g. laboratory technology,
legal drafting
Non-Competency Related Issues
- Policies and procedures, e.g. career development
plan, incentives/sanctions mechanism - Institutional infrastructure/equipment, e.g.
medical equipment, computer system
Awareness Commitment
- Awareness of capacity building issues
- Commitment/initial indicators of work on the
capacity building issues
10YIPD/CLGI believes that Local Government
officials lack some key competencies required to
achieve desired performance
Required Key Competencies
Sources of Performance Gap
- Specialized technical competence, e.g.
biotechnology, mining lab. technology, timber
inspection, medical analysis, hospital management - General management skills, e.g. leadership,
decision-making, HR management, change management - Financial management skills, e.g. property asset
management, performance budgeting, financial
reporting
- Competency related
- Technical skills gap, e.g. timber inspection
- Non-technical skills gap e.g.. decision making,
leadership, communication, financial reporting - Non-Competency related
- Unclear job expectation (performance goals) and
performance indicators - Insufficient performance feedback mechanism
- No incentive and sanction system to stimulate
good job behavior - Lengthy bureaucracy which reduces decision-making
ability and courage - One-way (top down) management approach weakens
initiative and creativity needed to perform well
in low-resources condition - Inadequate facilities, equipment and supplies
- Non-motivating organizational system, e.g.
unclear selection promotion mechanism
Competencies Gap
Existing Competencies
- Basic technical skills for all levels at each of
the 6 Dinas observed, except for Mining Energy
Unit, which lacks basic mining energy knowledge - Basic management knowledge and skills for middle
and senior level officials
11 while non-competency related issues are also
present
Organizational Software
Organizational Hardware
- Inadequate administrative and technical policies
procedures - Career path/system is not clearly communicated
- Lack of meaningful incentive system
- Absence of monitoring evaluation mechanism
- Insufficient sense of ownership and low
motivation for achievement - Weak organizational structure
- Lack of technical facilities, e.g. laboratory
for tobacco, rice, cattle reproduction, and
mining - Very limited availability of information and
communication technology system
12Tripartite partnership will leverage on each
partys resources to create a mutually beneficial
result
Roles Of Each Party In The Partnership
Local Government Role
- Write proposals for both training non-training
assistance - Select staff for training assistance
- Fund local expenses for training
Local Government
Private Sector
YIPD/CLGI
YIPD/CLGIs Role
Private Sector Role
- Involve in-house expertise in the technical
assistance - Cover YIPD/CLGI expenses incurred from Local
Government-related activities - Fund specific activities that would be of direct
benefit to the Company
- Provide guidance to Local Government in
developing proposals for assistance - Support private sector to ensure accountability
of the assistance program delivery