Broadband%20over%20Power%20line%20and%20its%20effect%20on%20emergency%20services - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Broadband%20over%20Power%20line%20and%20its%20effect%20on%20emergency%20services

Description:

Broadband over Power line and its effect ... After I got sick on a ride and went ... RAC is Radio Amateurs of Canada The FCC s Notice of Intent is an ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:157
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: EdB101
Learn more at: http://www.arrl.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Broadband%20over%20Power%20line%20and%20its%20effect%20on%20emergency%20services


1
Broadband over Power lineand its effect
onemergency services
  • Ron LaPedis, CBCP, CISSP, ISSMP, ISSAPRadio
    Amateur Extra N6QGK
  • When All Else Fails . . . Amateur Radio

2
Attribution
  • The material in this presentation comes from USA
    and Canadian sources. However, BPL is being
    proposed with similar specifications in many
    countries.
  • Radio waves do not stop at city, state,
    provincial, nor country boundaries.

3
Background
  • Hertz Basic unit of frequency in cycles per
    second Humans can hear frequencies from
    20-20,000 Hertz
  • MHz 1 million Hertz
  • High Frequency (HF) 3-30 MHz
  • Very High Frequency (VHF) 30-300 MHz
  • Ultra High Frequency (UHF) 300-3000 MHz
  • Wavelength (?) The distance between one peak of
    a wave and the next.
  • ? c / f where c 299792458 m/s (speed of light
    in a vacuum)

4
Background
  • The lower the frequency, the longer the antenna
    needed to send and receive it
  • All things being equal, lower frequencies (longer
    wavelengths) travel longer distances but do not
    penetrate buildings as well as higher
    frequencies.
  • HF needs little infrastructure for extended
    distance communications
  • It is also easier to transmit lower frequencies
    at higher power

5
Background
  • Radio amateurs talk about frequency bands by
    wavelength, not by frequency, hence 20 meter
    band, 40 meter band and so on.
  • F (299792458 m/s)/20m 14.9 MHz
  • Actual is 14.0-14.35 MHz

6
Background
7
Background
  • Many public safety radios use VHF
  • Trunking radios use UHF (800 MHz)
  • California Highway Patrol uses HF (29 MHz)
  • Aeronautics/Marine use HF VHF
  • Shortwave radio uses HF
  • HF communication makes use of the most important
    property of the frequencies between 2MHz and
    30MHz the ability to establish and maintain
    communications over great distances without any
    intervening man made infrastructure.

8
Background
  • Dont power companies send data over power lines
    already?
  • Yes, Power Line Carrier (PLC) is used for command
    and control but it is narrow-band low frequency
    (100 to 180 kHz) and low speed.
  • Current BPL is wide-band and uses 2.46 to 38 MHz.
    It offers 1-3 mBits/sec to the end point.

9
Broadband over Powerline diagram
10
Broadband over Powerline interference paths
11
BPL INTERFERENCE PATHS
  • Near field component
  • Less than 10 wavelength distance (70-1200 m)
  • Can only be reduced by shielding
  • Radiated component
  • More than 10 wavelength distance
  • Can be reduced by good transmission line
    technique (but power distribution lines are NOT
    good transmission lines).

12
RADIATED FIELD
13
HF/VHF Users
14
HF Users
15
Broadcast
16
Aviation
17
Amateur Radio Service
18
Marine and Land Mobile
19
FCC Notice of Inquiry
  • On April 28, 2003, the FCC released an NOI
    requesting comments and reply comments on
    primarily technical issues regarding BPL. The FCC
    sought information and data on the relevant
    technology.
  • In addition, the FCC sought comment on whether it
    should change the part 15 rules, 47 CFR 15, to
    allow for the legal and feasible deployment of
    BPL.

20
American Public Power Association
  • Given the tremendous potential of BPL to provide
    an advanced technology that utilizes additional
    facilities based mechanisms for providing
    services the burden should be imposed on
    challengers to BPL to demonstrate interference in
    a fact based, empirical proof.

21
APPA (cont.)
  • Further, to the extent that interference is
    demonstrated, there should be an attempt to
    accommodate BPL, even if it means that existing
    communications providers may have to share or
    transfer bandwidth.'

22
BPL Is Regulated by FCC Part 15
  • Carrier-current must meet limits for intentional
    emitters
  • Non-interference stipulated in part 15
  • Manufacturer responsible for FCC authorization
    and maximum limits
  • Operator responsible for harmful interference
  • Both are important to mitigate possible harmful
    interference

23
Harmful Interference
  • Defined as the repeated disruption of radio
    communications or any disruption of certain
    emergency communications services
  • From broadband device (BPL) will interfere with
    entire band(s)!
  • Will occur for entire length of line in areas
    where access BPL is deployed!

24
Potential Spectrum Loss
25
(No Transcript)
26
BPL Could Interfere With
  • Emergency management
  • National Guard
  • US Coast Guard
  • U.S. Military
  • Fire Departments
  • Law Enforcement
  • CAP
  • FAA
  • FEMA
  • NASA
  • Voice of America
  • TV stations
  • Low Power FM Broadcast Stations

27
BPL Could Also Interfere With
  • Radio astronomy
  • Amateur Radio services
  • Disaster communication networks
  • Land, fixed, mobile services
  • Military Affiliate Radio Systems (Army, Navy,
    Marine Corps, Air Force)
  • Citizens band

28
A Power Line
  • Is unshielded
  • Is an antenna!
  • It can transmit
  • and receive!

29
A power line and an antenna
30
An Amateur Radio Station
  • Is licensed by the FCC
  • Has access to various portions of the RF spectrum
    from 1.8 MHz thru 250 GHz
  • Transmits as much as 1500 W
  • Receives weak signals

31
Worldwide Problem
  • BPL was extensively studied in Japan and rejected
  • Trials continue in Europe
  • Multiple interference complaints have been
    documented

32
Organizations Voicing Concern About BPL
Interference
  • US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
  • US National Telecommunications and Information
    Administration (NTIA)
  • National short-wave listener associations
  • Short-wave broadcasters
  • Electronic-equipment manufacturers
  • GE Medical
  • Aeronautical

33
The Consumer
  • Consumers probably will not be aware of the
    documented interference potential
  • Early subscribers may be subjected to needless
    system problems due to the deployment of
    technology that has yet to be properly tested
  • Hams and emergency communications at risk

34
FEMA comments
  • BPL could severely impair FEMA's
    mission-essential HF radio operations in areas
    serviced by BPL technology.
  • BPL also could render such essential
    communications services as the Radio Amateur
    Civil Emergency Service (RACES), the Military
    Affiliate Radio System (MARS) and the Civil Air
    Patrol (CAP) useless.

35
FEMA (cont.)
  • FEMA said, there's no current alternative to HF
    in terms of meeting national security and
    emergency preparedness requirements at the
    national, state and local levels.

36
National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) Comment
  • Notwithstanding BPLS Potential Benefits, The
    Commission Must Ensure That Other Communications
    Services, Especially Federal Government
    Operations, Are Adequately Protected From
    Unacceptable Interference.

37
NTIAs Latest Filings
  • Rejects the idea of BPL ID
  • Excludes some freqs for aeronautics
  • Coastal station exclusion zones
  • Coordination areas around National Radio Quiet
    Zones
  • No other protections are mentioned!

38
Canadian Magazine TCA
39
BPL Interference compared to other Broadband
access technologies
  • DSL Tightly-coupled differential transmission
    line minimizes radiation.
  • Coax Fully shielded transmission line minimizes
    radiation,
  • Fiber Completely optical, ZERO radiation
  • Wireless Uses dedicated microwave frequencies
    not shared with other licensed servicesinterferen
    ce minimal

40
Future of BPL
  • Limited bandwidth, further constrained by
    chopping out slices due to interference
  • The spectrum is what it is, cant grow more
    spectrum. Power lines will not sustain microwave
    transmission, so BPL has finite, limited BW
  • Cable, wireless and particularly fiber have far
    greater bandwidth growth opportunity, without
    interference to other licensed services.
  • Interference both IN and OUT will lead to a lot
    of unpredictable service calls

41
How you Can Help
  • If you are a radio amateur
  • Join your countrys radio society if you are not
    currently a member
  • If you are a public safety official
  • Make contact with your national disaster
    management and radio licensing commissions

42
Radio Amateurs (hams) help recovery efforts
  • 9/11
  • Hurricanes
  • Tsunamis
  • Earthquakes
  • Chemical leaks
  • Train derailments
  • Blackouts

43
How hard is it to get a ham license?
44
What can hams do?
  • Communications relating to
  • Health and Welfare
  • Property
  • We cannot communicate about anything relating to
    business

45
What can hams do?
  • Business
  • Turn your security radios over to the business
    and fill in with amateurs
  • Public safety
  • Augment your communications with amateurs
  • Many PS systems are not interoperable
  • Infrastructure could be down
  • Hospitals, shelters, other deployments

46
More Information
  • http//www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/
  • http//www.rac.ca/regulatory/plc.htm
  • http//www.arrl.org/tis/info/part15.html

47
Video
Ed Hare is the Lab Manager for the ARRL. Ed
drove to BPL trial areas in New York,
Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia to document
possible interference from BPL. This video is
available on the ARRL web site.
48
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com