Ethics%20and%20Science%20Communication:%20Should%20you%20hold%20a%20press%20conference? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ethics%20and%20Science%20Communication:%20Should%20you%20hold%20a%20press%20conference?

Description:

Ethics and Science Communication: Should you hold a press conference? Clark Wolf Director of Bioethics Graduate Program in Sustainable Agriculture – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: CARD171
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethics%20and%20Science%20Communication:%20Should%20you%20hold%20a%20press%20conference?


1
Ethics and Science CommunicationShould you hold
a press conference?
Clark Wolf Director of Bioethics Graduate
Program in Sustainable Agriculture Department of
Political Science Department of Philosophy Iowa
State University jwcwolf_at_iastate.edu
2
Ethics and Technology
  • Technologies reflect the values of those who
    develop and use them.
  • Many technologies change the evaluative
    perspective of those who use them.

3
Ethics and Technology
  • When two opposite points of view are expressed
    with equal intensity, the truth does not
    necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It
    is possible for one side to be simply wrong.
    -Richard Dawkins

4
Ethics and Technology
  • Technologies reflect the values of those who
    develop them.
  • Many technologies change the evaluative
    perspective of those who use them.

5
Ethics and Technology
  • Whenever you make choices, you reveal your
    underlying values.
  • We can discover our values by digging out the
    reasons that lie behind our choices (and those of
    other people).
  • (There is always a risk of self-deception when we
    try to do this!)

6
Ethical Theory
  • We reveal our ethical views when we explain or
    justify our choices and behavior to others.
  • Ethical views can be thoughtless and
    unreflective, or thoughtful and reflective. To
    the extent that were thoughtless and
    unreflective, our value system will lack
    integrity and depth.
  • If our values are shallow and incoherent, we will
    make bad decisions, and we will be shallow and
    incoherent. (?)

7
Ethics and Technology
  • Where people disagree about policy or about
    technology, there are always values and ethical
    issues at play.
  • Logo North American Platform Against Wind Power

8
Ethics and Technology
  • Know your critics.
  • Respect your critics.
  • Take critical arguments seriously and evaluate
    them with intellectual integrity.

9
Science Communication
  • Should you talk with that reporter, or hide in
    your lab and wait until she goes away?

10
Ethics and Technology of Birds and Wind
Turbines?
  • Response 2
  • Investigate the basis and validity of critical
    claims.
  • Marshal relevant evidence and reasons.
  • Work to persuade those who disagree.
  • Response 1
  • Discredit critics
  • Work to change attitudes through rhetoric and
    deception.
  • Fight fire with fire.

11
Case Study Arsenate Life?
  • October 2010
  • NASA Astrobiology Unit announces a prospective
    news conference which would, as they claimed,
    impact the search for extraterrestrial life.

????????????????
12
Science 2 Dec 2010
13
  • FSW Press Conference on Arsenate Bacteria (7
    mins)
  • Take notes
  • What did she do well?
  • Were there obvious mistakes?
  • What could have been done better?

14
Press Conference
  • FWS Press Conference
  • https//www.youtube.com/watch?vWVuhBt03z8g
  • (7 mins start at 201-905)
  • Trump at the Scottish Parliament
  • https//www.youtube.com/watch?vXzoqTiTimPA
  • (11 mins from 153-1245)

15
  • FSW Press Conference
  • What did she do well?
  • Were there obvious mistakes?
  • What could have been done better?

16
  • Ive discovered Ive led a team that has
    discovered something that Ive been thinking
    about for many years. Ive been thinking about
    an idea of substitution what does it mean to be a
    substitution what does it mean to be toxic? Ive
    led a team that has discovered a microbe that can
    substitute arsenic for phosphorous in its major
    biomolecules.
  • -Felicia Wolfe-Simon,
  • NASA press conference
  • Dec. 2010

17
Hype and Spin?
  • Bacterium named GFAJ-1 (!?)
  • Felicia Wolfe-Simon immediately rose to rock-star
    status
  • Named among the 100 most influential scientists
    in TIME
  • Spread in GLAMOUR magazine.

18
Hype and Spin A Tragic ExampleArsenate
Bacterium Debacle
  • Questions immediately arose about the claims made
    in the paper.
  • FWS pushed back vigorously defended her work in
    public and in the press.

19
Hype and Spin A Tragic Example-The Arsenate
Bacterium Debacle
  • Rosie Redfield (UBC) analyzed DNA of GFAJ-1 using
    liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and could
    not detect any arsenic.
  • Called this a clear refutation and asked that
    the paper be retracted.

20
Hype and Spin A Tragic ExampleArsenate
Bacterium Debacle
  • Arsenic preference, or arsenic tolerance?
  • Questionable experimental design?
  • Overstatement of modest or early research
    results?

21
Hype and Spin A Tragic ExampleArsenate
Bacterium Debacle
  • What went wrong?
  • Methodological and Cognitive Errors Misreading
    experimental results, flawed research design
  • Overstatement of Results Hype?
  • Public Relations Disaster Cringe-worthy press
    conference.
  • Post-Critique Response Wolfe-Simon dug her
    heels in.

22
Hype and Spin A Tragic ExampleArsenate
Bacterium Debacle
  • What went wrong?
  • Methodological and Cognitive Errors Misreading
    experimental results, flawed research design
  • Overstatement of Results Hype?
  • Public Relations Disaster Cringe-worthy press
    conference.
  • Post-Critique Response Wolfe-Simon dug her
    heels in.

23
Ambiguous Cases and Clear Cases
  • Science Communication Issues in this case study
  • Public Presentation of Research Results Was
    this a case of morally problematic hype? If
    so, what features make this presentation hype?

24
Ambiguous Cases and Clear Cases
  • Science Communication Issues in this case study
  • Press Conference How should scientists present
    themselves in a context like this one? Was the
    problem the language that FSW (and others) used
    to describe the discovery?

25
  • Ive discovered Ive led a team that has
    discovered something that Ive been thinking
    about for many years. Ive been thinking about
    an idea of substitution what does it mean to be a
    substitution what does it mean to be toxic? Ive
    led a team that has discovered a microbe that can
    substitute arsenic for phosphorous in its major
    biomolecules. -Felicia Wolfe-Simon

26
  • Ive discovered Ive led a team that has
    discovered something that Ive been thinking
    about for many years. Ive been thinking about
    an idea of substitution what does it mean to be a
    substitution what does it mean to be toxic? Ive
    led a team that has discovered evidence that a
    microbe we have been testing can substitute
    arsenic for phosphorous in its major
    biomolecules.
  • -Felicia Wolfe-Simon
  • Question What if she had
  • said this instead?

27
Ambiguous Cases and Clear Cases
  • Science Communication Issues in this case study
  • Public Presentation of Research Results Was
    this a case of morally problematic hype? If
    so, what features of which communicative actions
    would make this hype?

28
Ambiguous Cases and Clear Cases
  • Science Communication Issues in this case study
  • Public Response to Critics Could FWS have
    protected herself by responding in a different,
    but no less powerful mode? Would different
    language have protected her?

29
Press Conference
  • FWS
  • https//www.youtube.com/watch?vWVuhBt03z8g
  • (7 mins start at 201-905)
  • Scottish Parliament
  • https//www.youtube.com/watch?vXzoqTiTimPA
  • (11 mins from 153-1245)

30
Donald Trump et al at the Scottish Parliament
  • You have been invited as a science expert to
    speak to the Scottish Parliament following
    presentations from people who are opposed to wind
    farm development in Scottland.
  • What should you say?

31
Donald Trump et al at the Scottish Parliament
  • What should you say?
  • Which issues are appropriately addressed by
    scientists?
  • Are there issues that are essentially political?
    Is there an appropriate way for a science expert
    to comment on these?

32
Thank you!
  • Clark Wolf
  • jwcwolf_at_iastate.edu

33
The questions
  • Should scientists communicate with the public
    and with media sources about their research,
    about recent advances, or about science
    controversies in the news?
  • What ethical norms should govern communication in
    these contexts?

34
When does Science Communication Go Bad?
  • Most work on Science Communication focuses on
    effective communication, not on the ethics of
    science communication.

35
When does Science Communication Go Bad?
  • It is simplicity that makes the uneducated more
    effective than the educated when addressing
    popular audiences.
  • -Aristotle

36
Proposed Answers
  • Scientists have a presumptive responsibility to
    communicate with the public when funding sources
    are public.
  • Because they hold important and relevant
    information, Scientists have a presumptive
    responsibility to inform public discussion of
    science controversies, including a responsibility
    to speak with media sources when requested to do
    so.

37
Proposed Answers
  • Scientists have a presumptive responsibility to
    communicate with the public when funding sources
    are public.
  • Because they hold important and relevant
    information, Scientists have a presumptive
    responsibility to inform public discussion of
    science controversies, including a responsibility
    to speak with media sources when requested to do
    so.

38
On presumptive obligations
  • To say that someone has a presumptive moral
    obligation to do X simply means that there is a
    good moral reason for this person to do X.
  • These reasons may be trumped or overridden by
    competing reasons, and people frequently have
    competing obligations.
  • Scientists who dont spend their time
    communicating with the public are not immoral for
    their lack of engagement.

39
Evaluating Wind Energy Generation and in Energy
Policy
  • Will the growth of wind energy
  • reduce our pollution and carbon footprint?
  • have a significant impact on wildlife, including
    rare or threatened species?
  • help us kick the fossil fuel habit?
  • help to achieve energy independence?
  • degrade our landscapes with unsightly
    turbines?
  • ?

40
Ethical issues often address underlying ethical
questions
  • Q Why decrease our carbon footprint?
  • A Reduce rate of global environmental change?
  • R1 You believe that climate crap?
  • A Technical? Evaluative?
  • R2 Why should we care about climate change?
  • A Obligation to future generations?
  • A Obligation to preserve the environment?

41
Ethical issues involve technical elements and
assumptions
  • Will the growth of wind energy help us to reduce
    our pollution and carbon footprint?
  • Full cost accounting Need to consider all the
    carbon-costs associated with wind power, and
    balance them against the carbon-reduction.
  • Such cost/benefit accounting reflects a
    consequentialist value frame.

42
Ethics of Science Communication In the News
43
Ethics of Science Communication In the News
Scientific American 22 October 2012
  • Scientific American
  • 22 Oct 2012

44
Ethically Problematic Modes of Communication
  • Advocacy Science
  • Framing Research Results
  • Hype
  • Spin

45
Ethically Problematic Modes of Communication
  • Advocacy Science Two Senses
  • (1) Using scientific results to influence
    political process or social outcomes, or
  • (2) Scientists use their professional status and
    prestige to try to influence political process or
    outcomes.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com