All You Ever Wanted to Know About Tests - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

All You Ever Wanted to Know About Tests

Description:

All You Ever Wanted to Know About Tests and More! Outcomes Identify types of tests Understand types of scores Be able to interpret test reports Two Major Types ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: Wilm69
Category:
Tags: know | play | preschool | tests | wanted

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: All You Ever Wanted to Know About Tests


1
All You Ever Wanted to Know About Tests and
More!
2
Outcomes
  • Identify types of tests
  • Understand types of scores
  • Be able to interpret test reports

3
Common VocabularyCommon Understanding
Learning Gains
FCAT CRT
FCAT NRT
SSS
Scale score
Raw Score
NPR
Achievement Level
4
Two Major Types of Tests
  • Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)
  • Criterion-Referenced Test (CRT)

5
What is a Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)?
  • A standardized assessment in which all students
    perform under the same conditions.
  • It compares the performance of a student or
    group of students to a national sample of
    students at the same grade and age, called the
    norm group.

6
What is a Criterion-Referenced Test (CRT)?
  • An assessment where a student's performance is
    compared to a specific learning objective or
    performance standard and not to the performance
    of other students.
  • It tells us how well students are performing on
    specific goals or content standards rather than
    just telling how their performance compares to a
    norm group of students nationally or locally.

7
Summary NRT and CRT
8
Raw Score (RS)
  • The number of items a student answers correctly
    on a test.
  • John took a 20 item mathematics test (where each
    item was worth one point) and correctly answered
    17 items.
  • His raw score for this assessment is 17.

9
Scale Score (SS)
  • Mathematically converted raw scores
  • that use a new scale to represent levels of
    achievement or ability.
  • For FCAT-SSS, a computer program is used to
    analyze student responses and to compute the
    scale score. It reports test results on the
    students entire test.

10
Scale Score (SS)
  • Higher scale scores indicate higher proficiency.
  • On a continuous, vertical scale across grade
    levels you can track a students progress from
    lower to upper grade levels on one scale. Growth
    in scale score units indicates growth in
    proficiency.
  • For FCAT-SSS, the Developmental Scale Score is
    used to determine a students annual progress
    from grade to grade.

11
Student Growth?
12
(No Transcript)
13
National Percentile Rank (NPR)
  • Percentage of students in the norm group whose
    scores fall at or below a given students score.
  • For example, a student scoring an NP of 71,
    scored as well or better than approximately 71
    percent of the students in the national norm
    group.

14
Percentile Score and NCE
Percentile 1 10
20 30 40 50 60 70
80 90 99
  • Distances between points are not equal on a
  • percentile scale.
  • At ends of scale the distances are larger.

Normal Curve Equivalent 1 10
20 30 40 50
60 70 80 90
99
  • On a NCE scale the distances are equal.

15
Normal Curve Equivalent (NCE)
  • Normal Curve Equivalents (NCEs) are
    norm-referenced scores ranging from 1 to 99 and
    have an average score of 50.
  • NCEs are an equal interval scale which allows for
    arithmetic calculations.
  • Changes in academic achievement are usually
    measured through NCE gains.
  • A student or group of students make an average
    years growth if they receive the same NCE score
    for two consecutive years.

16
True Score
  • A score entirely free of error.
  • Hypothetical value that can never be obtained by
    testing, since a test score always involves some
    measurement error.
  • A students "true" score may be thought of as the
    average of an infinite number of measurements
    from the same or exactly equivalent tests,
    assuming no practice effect or change in the
    student during the testing.

17
Standard Error of Measurement (SEM)
  • The amount a students score is expected to
    fluctuate around his or her true score.
  • SEM is frequently used to obtain an idea of the
    consistency of a students score or to set a band
    around a score.
  • For example, if a student scores 110 on a test
    and SEM6, we would say we are 68 confident the
    students true score was between (1101 SEM) and
    (1101 SEM) or between 104 and 116.

18
(No Transcript)
19
Learning Gains
The amount of progress a student makes in one
school year.
20
Learning Gains Who Qualifies?
  • All students with matched, consecutive years
    (i.e. 2005 2006) FCAT SSS results, grades 4-10,
    who were enrolled in the same school surveys 2
    3 (FTE)
  • including all subgroups (ESE, LEP, etc.).

21
Learning Gains Which Scores?
  • Gains apply in reading and math, not writing.
  • Previous years test score may be from same
    school, same district, or anywhere in the state.

22
Learning Gains What equals Adequate Yearly
Progress (AYP)?
A. Improve FCAT Achievement Levels from 2005 to
2006 (e.g. 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5) OR B. Maintain
satisfactory Achievement Levels from 2005-2006
(e.g. 3-3, 4-4, 5-5) OR C. Demonstrate more
than one years growth within Level 1 or Level 2
- determined by DSS Cut Points (not applicable
for retained students)
23
Learning Gains Retainees
A retained student can only be counted as making
adequate progress if he/she A. Moves up one
level. (e.g. 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5)
(Reason A) B. Maintains a level 3, 4, or 5.
(Reason B)
24
Developmental Scale Score Gains Table (DSS
Cut Points)
Students achieving within Level 1 (or within Level 2) for two consecutive years must gain at least one point more than those listed in the table in order to satisfy the making annual learning gains component of the school accountability system. Students achieving within Level 1 (or within Level 2) for two consecutive years must gain at least one point more than those listed in the table in order to satisfy the making annual learning gains component of the school accountability system. Students achieving within Level 1 (or within Level 2) for two consecutive years must gain at least one point more than those listed in the table in order to satisfy the making annual learning gains component of the school accountability system.
Grade Level Change Reading Mathematics
3 to 4 230 162
4 to 5 166 119
5 to 6 133 95
6 to 7 110 78
7 to 8 92 64
8 to 9 77 54
9 to 10 77 48
25
Learning Gains Activity
  • Using the data on the following table, determine
  • which students made a learning gain.
  • what percentage of the teachers students made a
    learning gain.

26
Data Display for FCAT Reading Results
Student 04/05 Grade Level 05/06 Grade Level Pre-test Achievement Level Pre-test DSS Post-test Achievement Level Post-test DSS Learning Gain Determination
A 7 8 Level 1 Level 2 Yes or No Reason A, B, or C
B 7 8 Level 4 Level 4 Yes or No Reason A, B, or C
C 7 8 Level 2 1598 Level 2 1743 Yes or No Reason A, B, or C
D 8 8 Level 1 Level 2 Yes or No Reason A, B, or C
E 8 8 Level 3 Level 3 Yes or No Reason A, B, or C
F 8 8 Level 1 1486 Level 1 1653 Yes or No Reason A, B, or C
G 7 8 Level 5 Level 4 Yes or No Reason A, B, or C
27
Teacher Learning Gains Based on Data Display
Total Number of Students with a Pre and Post-test who qualify for learning gain calculations Reason A Increased 1 or more Achievement Levels Reason B Maintains satisfactory levels (3, 4, or 5) Reason C DSS Target Gain (More than a years growth)
7 2 2 1
  • 5 out of 7 students made learning gains.
  • 71 of this teachers students made learning
    gains and add points towards the schools grade.
  • No points are given to the school for Student F
    because he was retained and stayed within level 1
    even though he made significant gains in DSS
    points.
  • No points are given to Student G because he
    decreased a level.

28
Class Record Sheet for Learning Gains
29
STANFORD 10 Activity
30
(No Transcript)
31
References/Acknowledgements
  • Bernhardt, Victoria L. Data Analysis for
    Comprehensive School Improvement, Eye on
    Education, Inc., 1998.
  • Wahlstrom, D. (1999). Using Data To Improve
    Student Achievement, Virginia Beach, VA.
    Successline, Inc.
  • Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement (2001).
    Glossary Of Measurement Terms. Internet document.
    San Antonio, TX.
  • Ferrer,Wilma. Power Point development.
  • Council for Educational Change, Student
    Performancec Snapshot
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com