Teaching and Learning Mathematics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Teaching and Learning Mathematics

Description:

Teaching and Learning Mathematics How did we get to where we are? Sputnik -- 1957 Led to the Woods Hole Conference Chaired by Jerome Bruner Sooner is Better!! – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:341
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: JAP55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Teaching and Learning Mathematics


1
Teaching and Learning Mathematics
  • How did we get to where we are?

2
Sputnik -- 1957
  • Led to the Woods Hole Conference
  • Chaired by Jerome Bruner
  • Sooner is Better!!
  • Clashed with Piaget

3
History after Woods Hole
  • 1960 Meaningful Math (New Math)
  • Not only do we need to know math, we need to
    be fluent math theorists!
  • 1980 Back to the Basics
  • Test scores have fallen, its a direct result
    of a lack of understanding the basics

4
History continued
  • 1989 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
    (NCTM) Standards
  • Teaching, Curriculum, Assessment
  • Adopted Constructivism
  • reasoning,
  • problem solving,
  • communication,
  • representation

5
The Time Line of Mathematics Instruction
  • 1900 1930 1960 1970 1980 1990
    2000
  • ____________________________________________
    gt
  • lt---Behaviorism--gtlt-Bruner-gtlt-Piaget---gtltInfo
    Processinggt
  • Drill practice, Meaningful New
    Constructivism
  • learning assoc- math math,
  • iations Spiral
  • Curriculum

6
Timss Trends in International Math and Science
Study
  • 13-year-olds from the U.S. are scoring
    substantially lower in mathematics than students
    from Korea, Ireland, Spain, and the United
    Kingdom
  • second International Assessment of Education
    Progress -1991, U.S. Students were outperformed
    by Korean, Swiss, and Taiwanese students in every
    area of mathematics

7
TIMMS continued
  • U.S. students are outperformed by French and
    Hungarian students in four out of five areas
    tested.
  • 13-year-old American students outperformed only
    Luxembourg, Nigeria, and Swaziland
  • 2006 data no change

8
NAEP National Assessment of Education Progress
Since 1969
  • 1 in 5 4th and 8th Graders is proficient in
    mathematics
  • 1/3 of 4th graders are below basic (lowest level)
  • 1 of 8th graders were proficient in Algebra,
    Geometry and basic functions

9
No Child Left Behind
  • 1) to institute high academic standards for all
    students, and
  • 2) to insure that there are 'highly qualified'
    teachers in every U.S. classroom

10
NCLB cont.
  • Content Standards.
  • Annual Testing. Ninety-five percent of all
    students in grades 3 8 must undergo annual
    testing in mathematics and reading.

11
NCLB cont.
  • Every Childs Test Score. NCLB requires that
    every student be tested (only very minor
    exceptions exist for severe mentally or
    physically handicapped students) and that every
    child reach proficiency by 2014. (if subgroup
    fails, the whole school fails)

12
NCLB cont.
  • Sanctions. By 2014 every American student who is
    tested (100) must demonstrate Adequate Yearly
    Progress (AYP) in reading and mathematics After
    five years of inadequate test score gains, a
    school falls into the reconstitution category.
    Such a fate results in dismissing the schools
    teachers and administration and closing the
    school.

13
NCLB cont.
  • Highly Qualified Teachers
  • Licensed in the area they teach
  • Understand the content
  • Gifted teachers

14
What do we need to do in order to compete in math
internationally?
  • Look at mathematics differently
  • Teach it Differently
  • Require students to solve problems to learn
    algorithms
  • Focus on Problem solving not mechanics

15
NCTM 2000 Six Features of the New Standards - 2000
  1. Equity high expectations for all students to
    study and learn mathematics
  2. Curriculum coherent, well-organized learning
    that integrates mathematics ideas
  3. Teaching understanding what students know and
    need to learn and using effective pedagogical
    strategies

16
  • 4. Learning actively building conceptual
    understanding and proficiency
  • 5. Assessment ongoing and routine enhancement
    of student learning and teacher instruction
  • 6. Technology normal and expected support for
    effective mathematics teaching and learning
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com