Standards The Achievement Gap - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Standards The Achievement Gap

Description:

Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues SOME BIG QUESTIONS How do standards relate to thinking-rich classrooms and helping all students learn ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: vuu5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Standards The Achievement Gap


1
StandardsThe Achievement Gap
  • The Debate Continues

2
SOME BIG QUESTIONS
  • How do standards relate to thinking-rich
    classrooms and helping all students learn
    course content?
  • What is your responsibility as educator in
    meeting particular standards and meeting the
    needs of students?
  • What is your responsibility as educator in
    ameliorating the achievement gap?

3
(No Transcript)
4
First
  • Move to one part of the room based on thoughts on
    this statement
  • Standards are necessary for increased learning.
  • Front agree
  • Back disagree
  • Why are you positioned where you are?

5
Achievement Gap
  • Position 1 Integration, Title I, and Head Start
    have been effective and should continue.
  • Position 2 New programs like NCLB needed because
    old programs are not effective.

6
Danielle Case
  • How do standards affect Danielle?
  • How does standardized testing affect Danielle?
  • How does the achievement gap affect Danielle?
  • What does she need to be thinking about in
    relation to how she can develop a thinking-rich
    classroom while keeping in mind issues related to
    standards, testing, and the achievement gap?

7
Why have standards?
  • Previously benchmark was level of completion
  • Indicators that US falling behind

8
A Nation at Risk
  • 1983. Alarmist call for better schools
  • Our Nation is at risk. Our once unchallenged
    preeminence in commerce, industry, science, and
    technological innovation is being overtaken by
    competitors throughout the world. ( 1)
  • If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to
    impose on America the mediocre educational
    performance that exists today, we might well have
    viewed it as an act of war. We have, in effect,
    been committing an act of unthinking, unilateral
    educational disarmament. ( 2).

9
NAEP
  • The Nations Report Card
  • Started 1969
  • Only nationally representative and continuing
    assessment for K-12 students
  • Based on a sample of student population
  • No individual scores aggregate and by population
    (e.g. females/males, African-American/
    Asian-American/ Caucasian/ Hispanic)

10
NAEP
  • Includes public and private schools
  • Grades 4, 8, 12
  • Test stays same stability
  • Reading, Math, Science, Writing, US History,
    Civics, Arts
  • Levels
  • basic, proficient, advanced

11
NAEP Reading Results 2002
  • Based on 270,000 students at 11,000 schools
  • 12th graders at or above basic or proficient
    decreased between 1998 and 2002
  • 8th graders at or above basic was higher than in
    all previous years
  • Females scored higher than males
  • White and Asian students higher than black and
    Hispanic

12
NAEP Reading Results 2002
  • Students attending schools receiving Title I
    funds scored lower (average) than students
    attending schools not receiving Title I funds.
  • Students who attended nonpublic schools had
    higher average scores than students in public
    schools.
  • Students in urban fringe/ large town areas had
    higher average scores than students in central
    city or rural areas.

13
No Child Left Behind
  • Re-tooled ESEA 1965
  • Focuses on
  • Increased funding for poor districts
  • Higher achievement for poor and minority students
  • New accountability measures for students
    progress
  • Dramatically expanding the role of standardized
    testing in schools

14
NCLB
  • Reform principles
  • Accountability
  • Flexibility
  • Research-based reforms
  • Parental options
  • States test every child in grades 3-8
  • Some states also have minimum competencies for
    graduation
  • Funding issues reading, reform, vouchers

15
NCLB
  • Does not represent national curriculum
  • Progress met through states setting targets for
    AYP in math and reading
  • AYP Goal is to have every student proficient in
    math and reading by 2014
  • If AYP not met
  • 1-2 years School improvement
  • 3 years Correction action
  • 4 years Possible restructuring

16
NCLB and Parents
  • Receive report card with scores
  • Scores disaggregated by subgroups based on race,
    ethnicity, gender, low-income status, disability
    status, migrant status, ELL (English Language
    Learners)
  • Professional qualifications of teachers (highly
    qualified)
  • Right to transfer if school failing 3 years

17
The illustrious achievement gap
  • Equal access ? equal opportunities.
  • WHY??

18
Barton1 Before and beyond school
  • Birthweight
  • Lead poisoning
  • Hunger and nutrition
  • Television watching
  • Parent availability
  • Student mobility
  • Parent participation
  • Reading to young children

1Barton, P. E. (2004). Why does the gap persist?
Educational Leadership, 62(3), 8-13.
19
Barton1 In school
  • Teacher experience and attendance
  • Teacher preparation
  • Class size
  • Technology-assisted instruction
  • School safety
  • Rigor of curriculum

1Barton, P. E. (2004). Why does the gap persist?
Educational Leadership, 62(3), 8-13.
20
Questions to Continue to Ponder
  • What is your responsibility as educator in
    ameliorating the achievement gap?
  • What is your responsibility as educator in
    meeting particular standards and meeting the
    needs of students?

21
Next Class
  • Diagnostic tools How can we determine what
    students need and what readings are appropriate?
  • Vacca and Vacca pp. 40-68
  • Bring to class a sample reading you may use with
    your students
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com