Social Care and Civic Engagement in the London Methodist District: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Care and Civic Engagement in the London Methodist District:

Description:

Social Care and Civic Engagement in the London Methodist District: A report prepared for the Social Care and Civic Engagement Commissions of the London Methodist District – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: JaneW160
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Care and Civic Engagement in the London Methodist District:


1
  • Social Care and Civic Engagement in the London
    Methodist District
  • A report prepared for the Social Care and Civic
    Engagement Commissions of the London Methodist
    District
  • Eva Neitzert Sociology Department LSE
  • Professor Jane Wills, Geography Department, QMUL

2
plan
  • Background to the research
  • Key findings social care
  • Key findings civic engagement
  • The map
  • Thinking ahead?

3
Background to the research
  • Sept 2006 new Methodist London District
  • Commissions Social Care Civic Engagement
  • What is the current position?
  • From there to strategy ...

4
What was done?
  • Questionnaires sent via Superintendents to cover
    all 267 Churches in the District
  • Response rate of 42 (102 Churches)
  • Follow up interviews to explore good practice
    with 24 respondents
  • Analysis of data production of an electronic
    map completion of the report.

5
Key findings social care
  • 1. Directly provided services on site
  • 2. Provided but off-site
  • 3. Provided but at Circuit level
  • 4. Hosted on site.

6
Direct provision on site?
7
  • Numbers of users in the report, but significant
    that there are few paid workers
  • Only 13 had no provision on site
  • 10 of these would like to but suffered lack of
    funds, facilities, volunteers and leaders.
  • As many as 70 would like to provide more ...

8
Off-site and at circuit level?
  • 34 involved often through partnerships with
    others.
  • 33 involved with Circuit level provision - but
    only 15 wanted to do more at this level.

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Hosting activities?
  • 90 were hosts to others (and the average number
    per church was 7)
  • egs. CAB, playgroups, AA, refugee groups

12
Key findings civic engagement
  • 1. Involvement in faith/community forums
  • 2. Frequency of meetings with local civic and
    political leaders
  • 3. Direct involvement in local institutions

13
Faith/community forums
  • 63 of Churches participate
  • And, concentration 29 involved in two or more
    forums 36 not involved in any

14
Meetings with civic and political leaders
  • 58 meets at least one
  • councillors most regular (half every month or
    quarter)
  • often ad hoc but many of the regulars host the
    councillor or MP at Church

15
Involvement in local institutions
  • 49 have at least one congregation member
    involved as elected or appointed office holder

16
Community issues?
17
Tackling these?
  • People positive about engaging with civic
    leaders/politicians
  • An increased campaigns focus (one respondent
    called on the Church to be an irritant to a
    complacent society)
  • Facilitating understanding and dialogue,
    particularly between different faith and ethnic
    groups
  • Working in partnership with other faith and
    community organisations
  • Informing, sharing expertise, and providing
    spiritual leadership
  • Supporting other groups and organisations to do
    good work (eg., by letting out space to
    emerging community organisations)
  • Having an open doors policy to support people
    of diverse backgrounds.

18
The map
  • Available at http//www.londonmethodist.org/admin/
    Map.aspx

19
Thinking ahead
  • 2/3rds want to do more especially for young
    people, migrants and refugees, those suffering
    substance abuse.
  • Many want a more campaigning approach
  • Parallel with national survey of 49
    congregrations (Roehampton study 2006) church
    better at in-ward than outward activities.

20
How on social care?
  • Collating/disseminating information about good
    practice
  • Developing London-wide strategy - mindful of
    three key barriers
  • 1. facilities
  • 2. staffing/volunteers
  • 3. funding

21
challenges
  • Facilities help with funding/grants managing
    projects/planning.
  • Staffing need to employ people but again raises
    issue of money.
  • Funding often short-term often for start-ups -
    and Churches need their own money.

22
Good practice
  • Parchmore Centre, Thornton Heath (1700 users, 45
    groups, 20 staff, 120 volunteers)
  • Harold Road Centre, Newham (10 office spaces 2
    staff community centre)
  • HIV Chaplaincy (78 people for face to face
    support)
  • Asylum ministry, Kings Cross (2000 use services
    every year)

23
How on civic engagement?
  • Challenges time engaging the congregation
    links beyond the Church
  • Solutions integration in worship joining
    broad-based organisations and campaigns
    co-ordination across the District (egs. Make
    Poverty History TELCO Methodist campaigns? eg
    on immigration)

24
And theology ...
  • Where does social care and civic engagement fit
    theologically?
  • Another area for partnership, information sharing
    and District strategy?

25
Thanks!
  • Queen Mary for facilitating the project
  • Eva Neitzert, LSE, Researcher
  • Ed Oliver, QMUL, Cartographer
  • Paul Regan and the other leaders of the two
    Commissions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com