The 4th International Conference on Population Geographies The Chinese University of Hong Kong - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

The 4th International Conference on Population Geographies The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Description:

The 4th International Conference on Population Geographies The Chinese University of Hong Kong Topic Effects of Budgetary Policies on Population Migration A ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Aqu125
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The 4th International Conference on Population Geographies The Chinese University of Hong Kong


1
The 4th International Conference on
Population Geographies The Chinese University of
Hong Kong
  • TopicEffects of Budgetary Policies on Population
    Migration ?A complexity approach
  • Author presenter Min-shen Hsueh
  • Author Prof. Shih-Kung Lai
  • Room 2A ELB-LT1
  • AM1130-1150 Date July 11, 2007

2
Research structure
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Purpose motivation of research
  • 3. Methodology design of research
  • 4. Analysis of research
  • 5. Result of research
  • 6. Conclusions

3
Purpose motivation of Research
  • Does population migration tested after the model
    of power law with
  • 1. Educational budget
  • 2. Economic development budget
  • 3. Community welfare budget
  • 4. Community environmental protection budget
  • Could find or enforce agglomeration and
    decentralization of population?

4
  • Issues of Research
  • 1. Does public policy used will be affected on
    the self-organization of population migration ?
  • 2. Does the phenomenon of power law on population
    migration was affected by public policies?
  • 3. Does the independent character of power law be
    affected by human activity ?

5
complexity theory
  • A new approach to science that studies how
    relationships between parts give rise to the
    collective behaviors of a system and how the
    elements interacts and forms relationships with
    its environment.
  • 1.Emergence
  • 2.Nonlinearity
  • 3.Interacting agents
  • 4.Increasing returns
  • 5.Self-organization(chaos, order, and complexity)
  • 6.Power law

6
Power Law
  • A power law is any polynomial relationship
    that exhibits the property of scale invariance.
  • Power law with a particular scaling exponent
    is equivalent up to constant factors, its
    behavior is what produces the linear relationship
    when both logarithms are taken of both f(x) and
    x, and the straight-line on the log-log plot is
    often called the signature of a power law.

7
Power Law
  • Scale as bigger or smaller was contrasted with
    its own numbers, but form linearity after double
    logarithm. (example as city)
  • PrP1r-q , Pr scale of person of the r rank
    city, rrank (means slope),
  • P1scale of person of the first rank city ,
    qZipf force (means r square and usually equal 1)
  • Slope means agglomeration (usually take absolute
    value) r square means self-organizations degree.

8
Slope as agglomerations or disseminations
  • More steep, more agglomeration less steep, less
    agglomeration.

9
Affected of economic development budget-Taipei
county
10
Affected of community protection budget-Xinzu
county
11
Self-organization
  • Self-organization is a process where the
    organization (constraint, redundancy) of a system
    spontaneously increases, i.e. without this
    increase being controlled by the environment or
    an encompassing or otherwise external system.
  • 1.Activity of whole system
  • 2.Many sub-systems in the whole system
  • 3.Internal logic behavior of each sub-systems
  • 4.Emergence of structure was not arise inherent
    among locations differences but from internal
    logic behavior of the system.
  • 5. Example Critical Mass (bicycle), herd
    behaviors, groupthink

12
Research methodology
  • 1.Number of analysis of Regions22counties/cities
    s budget.
  • 2.Number of analysis of Time15time items
    budget.

13
Methodology design of research
  • Research of design-1
  • Targets Education, Economic development,
    Community welfare, Community environmental
    protection budget population of each
    county/city in Taiwan.
  • Data(amount)be counterweigh
  • 1.four budgets be managed with counterweigh
  • 2.total add the value of four budgets after
    counterweigh .

14
  • Research of design-2
  • 1.Keeping order as big from small to the value of
    general average
  • 2.22counties, and 15time series of budget with
    ordering rank array.(rank as order of number of
    each item size as distribution of 4 budgets)
  • 3.Double Logarithm to both of Rank and size,
    coefficient of agglomeration of population slope
    and R-square(as evidence of power law)were taken.

15
Analysis of research-1
  • 1?affected of educational budget
  • (1) population agglomeration coefficient(as
    slope)
  • Regionsit could affected the population
    agglomeration strongly.
  • Timebe formed polarization on population
  • (2) self organization coefficient (as R-square)
  • Regioncan not find high evidence of self
    organization effect.
  • Timecould not find the relationships of self
    organization effect.

16
Analysis of research-2
  • 2?affected of economic development budget
  • (1) population agglomeration coefficient(as
    slope)
  • regions it could affected the population
    agglomeration strongest among these four.
  • Time could not find more agglomeration
    strongly.
  • (2) self organization coefficient (as R-square)
  • regions could not find self organization
    effect .
  • Timealso could not find self organization
    effect neither.

17
Analysis of research-3
  • 3? affected of community welfare
  • (1)population agglomeration coefficient(as
    slope)
  • Regionscould affected the population
    agglomeration strongest as economic development
    budgets effect.
  • Time also find it affected the population
    agglomeration strongest too.
  • (2) self organization coefficient (as R-square)
  • Regionsno self organization effect.
  • Timeit was show self organization effect
  • stronger than others.

18
Analysis of research-4
  • 4? affected of community protection budget
  • (1)population agglomeration coefficient(as slope)
  • Regionsit could affected the population
    agglomeration stronger a little.
  • Timeit could not affect the population
    agglomeration stronger.
  • (2) self organization coefficient (as R-square)
  • Regionscould not find high self organization
    effect.
  • Timeit has more self organization effect
  • as community welfares effect.

19
Result-1
  • 1 .power law self organization situations
    were working itself on the regions with time
    passing, they do not affect by man made
  • they are not affected such as educational
    budget has upper than the limited, we can not
    find power law was stop working.

20
Result-2
  • 2.Man made as budget could not stop the power law
    working, and self-organization situations of
    natural matters were doing itself automatically.
  • 3.Budgetary policies such as educational budget
    may push population agglomerations move strongly,
    but just on contemporary.

21
conclusions
  • Public policies were men made as limitation as
    educational budget, under the test of time
    series,
  • which its power law(population agglomeration)and
    self-organization degree were affected lower and
    less than other three none limitation budgets
    effect.

22
1991??2005????????(?????)???????slope?R2???(slope?
???????)
23
1991??2005?????????????????????slope?R2???
24
1991?2005??????????????slope?R2???
25
  • Ending
  • Thank you very much
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com