Topic 2:Principles for Analyzing Government - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Topic 2:Principles for Analyzing Government

Description:

Topic 2 Principles for Analyzing Government – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: jk451
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Topic 2:Principles for Analyzing Government


1
Topic 2Principles for Analyzing Government
2
  • Adam Smith (17231790)noted that in a market
    economy, individuals pursuing their own
    self-interests are led as if by an invisible hand
    to pursue the best interests of the society.
  • Adam Smith. The Wealth of Nations.1776.
  • The market system is based on the principle of
    voluntary exchange.

3
(No Transcript)
4
  • Under ideal circumstances the market allocates
    resources in the most efficient manner possible.
  • Then, why should we have a government?

5
The Market Economy
  • Resource allocation in a competitive
    market(figure 2.1)

6
The Role of Government
  • Firstly, government protects the rights of
    individuals, which enables them to engage in
    voluntary market transactions.
  • Secondly, the government can be viewed as an
    instutution that acts in the public interests.

7
  • The priciple underlying the private sector of the
    economy is voluntary exchange, while in the
    public sector of the economy, the government
    forces people to obey its rules and pay for its
    output.
  • This raises a whole set of questions
  • How do we know that we all benefit from the
    government's programs?
  • Should someone who never uses a park be forced to
    pay for it?
  • If these things really benefit us, why do we have
    to be forced to pay for it?

8
  • The government's activities can be analyzed
    within the framwork of two general categories.
  • the first category concerns the scope of
    governmental activities
  • the second category concerns how the government
    finances its activities.

9
The Market System and Individual Rights
  • The market system presupposes that individuals
    have the right to the output they produce and
    have the right to freedom of exchange.
  • police
  • national defence
  • court system

10
  • The government as protector of rights
  • without government protcetion of individual
    rights, people would have to find ways to protect
    their own rights, which would greatly reduce the
    efficiency of an economy.
  • people would have no incentive to produce any
    more than they could individually protect.

11
  • The government as violator of rights
  • with too much government, unconstrained in its
    activies, there is the potential for predation
    through government.

12
The Public Interest
  • The government should act in the public interest.
    But what is the public interest?

13
  • Jeremy Bentham(17481832)
  • the public interest would be served by policies
    that produced the greatest good for the greatest
    number.
  • Jeremy Bentham. An Introduction to the Principles
    of Morals and Legislation. 1789

14
  • Bentham's method of considering the public
    interest is sometimes referred to as
    utilitarianism because it attempts to take
    account of the relative satisfaction, or utility,
    of everyone in a society.

15
  • utilitarianism
  • the amount of satisfaction or utility that an
    individual received from consuming goods or
    services can be measurable.
  • one way to measure the public interest is to add
    up the total utility of all the individuals in a
    society.

16
  • John Stuart Mill(1806-1873)
  • Principles of Political Economy, 1848

17
  • Policy suggestion
  • Any policy that increased total utility would
    then be in the public interest because the
    utility gained by the gainers would be more than
    sufficient to offset the utility loss to the
    losers.
  • the policy of distribution of income

18
  • drawbacks
  • there is no valid way to compare the utility of
    one person with the utility of another.
  • taken to its logical consequences, utilitarianism
    implies social arrangements that most people
    would find objectionable.

19
  • Michael J.Sandel
  • Justice What's the Right Thing to Do?

20
The Pareto Criteria
  • Vilfredo Pareto(1848-1923), ecnomics and
    sociologist
  • He developed two criteria, now known as Pareto
    optimality and Pareto superiority, for judging
    the public interest.

21
  • Because it is not possible to compare the
    utilities of two individuals, the only way one
    can be sure that a change will increase the
    social welfare is if the change makes at least
    one person better off, but makes no one worse
    off.
  • Such a change would be called a Pareto superior
    move, or a Pareto improvement.

22
  • the Pareto criteria(figure 2.2)

23
  • Market exchange and the Pareto creteria
  • Unless people not involved in the exchange are
    harmed, every market exchange is a Pareto
    superior move.
  • With government allacation of resources, there is
    rarely unanimous agreement, and some people gain
    while others lose, making it hard to say for sure
    that the social welfare has been enhanced.

24
  • Political exchange and the Pareto creteria
  • many activities of government produce benefits to
    some but impose costs on others.
  • in practical terms it may not be possible to take
    any action in the public sector if the strict
    conditions of the Pareto criteria are adhered to.

25
Other Measures of the Public Interest
  • potential compensation
  • Hicks-Kaldor cirteria
  • if a proposed change benefits the gainers by
    enough that they could take some of their gains
    and compensate the losers so that everyone could
    be made better off, then the proposed change is
    in the public interest.

26
  • the social welfare function(figure 2.3)

PP utility possibility frontier UNsocial
indifference curve
27
  • It is really a type of utilitarianism. It is
    applied to income distribution problems to
    determine the optimal amount of redistribution
    through the tax system.
  • By contrast, the Pareto criteria are not well
    suited to distributional issues.

28
  • cost-benefit analysis
  • In actual pracice, it is frequently used to
    determine whether public sector projects are in
    the public interest.
  • The main difficulty is to place an accurate
    dollar value on all the benefits and costs of a
    particular project.

29
Positive and Normative Economics
  • Positive economics examines the real world to
    discover its characteristics and
    interlationships.
  • Normative economics makes value judgement as to
    how the world should be.

30
  • e.g. the minimum wage law
  • How will the two kinds of economics analyze the
    law?

31
  • normative analysis and the public interest
  • when studying the public sector, the normative
    elements necessarily enter into the picture
    because the government's activities are the
    result of choices.

32
Equity and Efficiency the Goals of Pubic Policy
  • Whether a change allocates resources more
    efficiently is a positive issue.
  • The goal of equity is fundamentally a normative
    issue.

33
  • Discussion
  • Is there a trade-off between equity and
    efficiency in public policy, or can the two goals
    be reached simultaneoursly?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com