SENS: A Sensor, Environment and Network Simulator - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SENS: A Sensor, Environment and Network Simulator

Description:

SENS: A Sensor, Environment and Network Simulator Sameer Sundresh, Wooyoung Kim and Gul Agha University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://osl.cs.uiuc.edu – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: illi45
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SENS: A Sensor, Environment and Network Simulator


1
  • SENS A Sensor, Environment and Network Simulator
  • Sameer Sundresh, Wooyoung Kim and Gul Agha
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • http//osl.cs.uiuc.edu
  • Presented at ANSS 37
  • April 21, 2004

2
What is a Sensor Network?
  • Many simple nodes with sensors deployed
    throughout an environment.
  • Determination of sensor positions (localization)
  • Cooperative target identification tracking
  • Indoor or outdoor environment monitoring
  • Civil structural health monitoring (SHM)

3
Example Localization Experiment
4
Example Structural Health Monitoring
Accelerometer board prototype, Ruiz-Sandoval,
Nagayama Spencer, Civil E., U. Illinois
Urbana-Champaign
Semi-active Hydraulic Damper (SHD), Kajima
Corporation, Japan
Model bridge with attached wireless sensors, B.F.
Spencers Lab, Civil E., U. Illinois U-C
5
Characteristics of Sensor Networks
  • Errors are common.
  • Wireless communication
  • Noisy measurements
  • Node failures are to be expected
  • Network interacts heavily with environment.
  • Highly constrained nodes.
  • e.g. 4k RAM, 2 AA batteries, 20msg/s radio
  • Must operate for months, little supervision.
  • Experiments are time- and space-intensive.

6
Related Work
  • Custom application-specific simulators
  • Network simulators
  • OPNET, ns-2, Monarch (based on ns-2), GloMoSim
  • Sensor network wireless protocol simulators
  • UCLA SensorSim, GeorgiaTech SensorSimII
  • Sensor node simulators
  • TOSSIM (for TinyOS), TOSSF (based on SWAN)
  • Application-oriented simulators
  • SENS, Siesta, EmStar

7
Simulator Structure
SENS is composed of several concurrently
interacting components modeled as actors.
8
Simulator Components
  • Application
  • sense/actuate interface
  • message send/receive interface
  • Physical
  • handles sense/actuate together with Environment
  • maintains radio sensor neighbor sets
  • computes power usage (based on actuate requests
    to enable/disable simulated hardware)
  • Network
  • handles send/receive
  • several interchangeable implementations

9
Simple Application
  • include "System/Sim.h"include
    "Interfaces/PhysicalMessages.h"// Message type
    definitions.MESSAGE_TYPE(AppMesg, int)//
    Application to be simulated on a node.class
    SimpleApplication public Application public
    SimpleApplication(SimController sc, node_id
    id_, vectorltstringgt args)
    Application(sc, id_) schedule(new
    AppMesg(77), 0.5) // Send message to self.
    registerHandler(SimpleApplicationonAppMes
    g) registerHandler(SimpleApplication
    onSensorValue) // Message handlers.
    void onAppMesg(AppMesg ) cout
    ltlt "I'm not really listening. " ltlt getTime() ltlt
    endl send(new AppMesg(77), 0.3) //
    Radio neighborhood broadcast. void
    onSensorValue(SensorValue sv) cout
    ltlt getTime() ltlt " SA " ltlt id ltlt " sensed
    something " ltlt endl // Add
    SimpleApplication to the ComponentRegistry so it
    is instantiable from config files.static
    RegisterApplicationltSimpleApplicationgt
    re_app("SimpleApplication")

10
Network Components
  • Trade off simulation efficiency and accuracy
  • SimpleNetwork immediate, guaranteed delivery to
    all neighbors within range.
  • ProbLossyNetwork probabilistic delivery and
    delay delivery probabilities can optionally
    decrease under heavy traffic.
  • CollisionLossyNetwork calculates collisions at
    receiving end based on message overlap and
    relative signal strengths selectable interval
    size.

11
Environment Simulation
  • Environment is divided into tiles with different
    signal propagation characteristics.
  • Based on experimental measurements.
  • Each sensor is located on one tile.

12
Environment Simulation
  • Environment is divided into tiles with different
    signal propagation characteristics.
  • Based on experimental measurements.
  • Each sensor is located on one tile.

Maximum range cut-off
Soundmuffled by grass
Echo
Beep!
13
Circular Wave Propagation
14
Circular Wave Propagation
15
Measurement and Attenuation
  • Must translate total energy passing through a
    tile to energy of the signal received by a
    sensor.
  • Can use f to calculate energy density.
  • Else divide total energy by max. arclength,
    approx. by sin?cos?.
  • Circular waves 2-D 1/r
  • Simulate 3-D 1/r2 by propagating
    sqrt(energy)
  • To simulate attenuation A observed by real
    sensors, apply M-1(A(M(e))).

16
Simulation Parameters
  • Determines behavior of nodes and signals.
  • Can be adjusted forother scenarios.

17
Observed Mica-2 Radio Range (sketch)
40 signal strength variation with angle
18
Ranging Simulation vs. Experiment
  • Wall effects evident.
  • Similar behavior.
  • Experiment was separate from calibration.

3m tall, 2/3m thick brick wall
19
Simplified Localization Example
  • Typical sensor data is location-dependent, hence
    localization is a necessary service.
  • Anchor nodes know their locations.
  • Perform triangulationusing ranging data.
  • Errors due to obstacles(indirect sound paths).
  • Anchor
  • Grass or wall
  • Real vs. localized

20
Ranging/Localization Complications
21
Localization vs. Obstacle Density
22
Non-Anchor Power Usage Simulation
  • Power savings of the black listing policyIf a
    non-anchor believes it will not make a successful
    ranging measurement to an anchor, it should not
    even bother trying.

23
Simulator Performance
  • n sensor nodes
  • t simulated time
  • Exec. time O(nt),PC much faster than sensor
    node
  • Setup time O(n2) interactions

Time to simulate 1000 seconds ofsimplified
localization application.
24
Ongoing Work
  • More detailed measurements of node behavior
  • acoustic ranging in presence of wind, echoes
  • radio signal strength (e.g. imperfect antenna)
  • inter- and intra-node timing characteristics
  • Civil structure environment model
  • Matlab model for environment
  • Experimental validation of sensor simulations

25
Ongoing Work
  • Language/API refinement
  • deployable sensor node code
  • automatic annotation of timing and power
  • Use in sensor network service development
  • localization (acoustic, radio)
  • Soham Mazumdar, Ashish Agarwal, Indranil Gupta,
    Wooyoung Kim Gul Agha, Fast Range Queries
    Using Pre-Aggregated In-Network Storage,
    submitted to ACM SenSys 2004.
  • structural health monitoring
  • geographic routing

26
  • http//osl.cs.uiuc.edu

27
End of slides.
28
A Typical Wireless Sensor Node
  • Mica-2 from Crossbow
  • 4MHz 8-bit Atmel AVR
  • 4096 bytes RAM
  • 128kB flash for program code
  • 433MHz, 32kb/s radio ( 20 30-byte messages/s)
  • Powered by 2 AA batteries
  • Mica-2 sensor board
  • 4kHz audio buzzer microphone tone detector
  • 2-axis accelerometer, 2-axis magnetometer
  • light/temperature sensor
  • Currently costs 150, eventually under 10.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com