Title: Music: The Beatles, Magical Mystery Tour (1967) (on one speaker ?)
1Music The Beatles, Magical Mystery Tour
(1967)(on one speaker ?)
- Written Briefs Due
- HELIUM Monday 9/15 (Mullett)
- CHLORINE Wednesday 9/17 (Manning)
2KRYPTON DQ25 (Applying Shaw)
- The pursuer must 1 bring them into his power
and control, and 2 so maintain his control as
to show that he does not intend to abandon them
again to the world at large. - Apply to Liesner (trial court facts)
- Mortal wound Vigorous pursuit
- Escape improbable
3KRYPTON DQ25 (Applying Shaw)
- The pursuer must 1 bring them into his power
and control, and 2 so maintain his control as
to show that he does not intend to abandon them
again to the world at large. - Apply to Pierson facts
4KRYPTON DQ26 (Sunken Boat)
- Should the result in Shaw be the same if the
fishermen used a sunken boat instead of a net to
trap the fish? Assume the boat retains the same
percentage of fish who enter it as the net in
Shaw.
5KRYPTON DQ26 (Sunken Boat)
- Marking/Notice to Others will be an important
recurring policy concern. - See Shaw test part 2 maintain his control as to
show that he does not intend to abandon - See Pierson Mortal wounding pursuit OK because
hunter thereby manifests an unequivocal
intention of appropriating the animal
6NEON DQ27
- Can you frame a single rule that makes sense of
the results in Pierson, Liesner, and Shaw? - Why is this a useful exercise?
- E-mail me examples Ill write up
7RING STORY (10/78-1/84)
8New Issue in Unit IB Escape
- GENERALLY WHEN DOES OWNER OF ESCAPED ANIMAL LOSE
PROPERTY RIGHTS? - Why Different from Ring?
- What Facts are Relevant?
9New Issue in Unit IB Escape
- Different from First Possession (Where All 3
Cases Ask Similar Qs) - Escape Cases Focus on Different Concerns
- Mullett Applies English Common Law Rule
- Manning Fact-Specific Result Not Using English
Common Law Test
10NEON DQ28
- Assume that we are in a world where the
net-owners have no enforceable rights in fish
caught in their nets until they physically remove
the fish from the nets. Thomas chooses to take
fish from the owners nets. Who is affected by
this decision?
11EXTERNALITIES
- Cost or benefit external to a decision-making
process - Must be w reference to particular decision
- helpful to start by identifying decision-maker
12EXTERNALITIES
- Cost or benefit external to a decision-making
process - Must be w reference to particular decision
- helpful to start by identifying decision-maker
- If decision-maker considers a cost, but chooses
to absorb it, not an externality - E.g., Thomas considers own exertion necessary to
take from nets, may decide to take anyway
13EXTERNALITIES
- Some Likely Externalities in DQ28
- Costs to net-owners their families
- Loss of availability to purchasers from
net-owners - Effects on net manufacturers
- Effects on fish food chain (might be benefits
if net-fishing discouraged)
14INTERNALIZINGEXTERNALITIES
- Changing Rules, Laws or Circum-stances to Force
Decision-Maker to Take Costs or Benefits Into
Account
15INTERNALIZINGEXTERNALITIES
- Changing Rules, Laws or Circumstances to Force
Decision-Maker to Take Costs or Benefits Into
Account - Imposed from Outside Generally Not Done by
Decision-Maker
16INTERNALIZINGEXTERNALITIES
- Changing Rules, Laws or Circumstances to Force
Decision-Maker to Take Costs or Benefits Into
Account - DQ30 (Oxygen) Examples of Internalizing from
Outside Reading?
17INTERNALIZINGEXTERNALITIES
- Changing Rules, Laws or Circumstances to Force
Decision-Maker to Take Costs or Benefits Into
Account - Beneficial Because Means Price of Activities Will
Reflect Real Costs (e.g., pollution costs)
18INTERNALIZINGEXTERNALITIES
- Changing Rules, Laws or Circumstances to Force
Decision-Maker to Take Costs or Benefits Into
Account - Beneficial Because Means Price of Activities Will
Reflect Real Costs (e.g., pollution costs) - Can Internalize Several Ways
- Require Payment of Damages
- Criminalize Activity
- Private Negotiation (Bribes)
19NEON DQ28
- If the fish are worth more to the net-owners than
to Thomas, presumably there is some amount of
money they could contract to pay him to leave the
fish alone that would leave all parties better
off than before the contract.
20NEON DQ28
- What obstacles stand in the way of the parties
entering this contract? - Assume cost to net-owner is 500/wk benefit to
Thomas is 300/wk. - Assume One-on-One Negotiation.
-
21Costs of One-on-One Negotiation
- Investigation Costs
- Bargaining Costs
- Strategic Behavior
- Enforcement Costs
22NEON DQ28
- What obstacles stand in the way of the parties
entering this contract? - Assume cost to each net-owner is 500/wk
benefit to each fish-taker is 300/wk. - Assume Multi-Party Negotiation.
-
23Additional Costs of Multi-Party Negotiation
- Free-Riding
- Holdouts
- Organization/Management Costs
24Collectively Transaction Costs
- Investigation Costs
- Bargaining Costs
- Strategic Behavior
- Enforcement Costs
- Free-Riding
- Holdouts
- Organization/Management Costs
25Transaction Costs Can Prevent Parties from
Reaching Bargains that are Efficient ( Would
Make Everyone Better Off)
26The Rhythm of the First Year
- Same at Every School Where Ive Taught
27The Rhythm of the First Year
- Three Typical Low Points
- Mid-September
- Mid-October
- Mid-November
28The Rhythm of the First Year
- The Crisis of Mid-September
- I am the Stupidest Person Here They Let Me In
By Mistake
29The Rhythm of the First Year
- The Crisis of Mid-September
- Learning New Language by Immersion
-
30The Rhythm of the First Year
- The Crisis of Mid-September
- Learning New Language by Immersion
- Easy Questions Hard Questions
31The Rhythm of the First Year
- The Crisis of Mid-September
- Learning New Language by Immersion
- Easy Questions Hard Questions
- Other Perils of the Socratic Method
32The Rhythm of the First Year
- The Crisis of Mid-September
- Learning New Language by Immersion
- Easy Questions Hard Questions
- Other Perils of the Socratic Method
- Calisthenics Why We Do What We Do