Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Review

Description:

Review Bigger sample size (more data) will Increase reliability Decrease reliability Review Greater variability among individuals will Increase reliability Decrease ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: colo102
Learn more at: http://matt.colorado.edu
Category:
Tags: hockey | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Review


1
Review
  • Bigger sample size (more data) will
  • Increase reliability
  • Decrease reliability

2
Review
  • Greater variability among individuals will
  • Increase reliability
  • Decrease reliability

3
Review
  • A bigger effect size in your data will
  • Increase reliability
  • Decrease reliability

4
Research Design
  • 8/28

5
Overview
  • Components of scientific studies
  • Types of scientific studies
  • Inferring causation
  • Independent and dependent variables
  • Confounds, random assignment
  • Quasi-independent variables

6
Components of Scientific Studies
  • Scientific study Basic unit of empirical
    research
  • Variables
  • Anything that can take on multiple values
  • Height, IQ, reaction time, extraversion, favorite
    color
  • Measured in scientific studies
  • Hypothesis
  • Conjecture about how the world works
  • Prediction about how variables relate
  • Taller people are smarter
  • This drug improves memory
  • Blue is more popular than red
  • Data (singular datum)
  • Results of measurements
  • Values of variables
  • IQ of Subject 4
  • Reaction time of Subject 12 on Trial 23

7
Types of Scientific Studies
  • Experiment
  • Involves some sort of intervention or
    manipulation
  • Researcher sets some variable(s) and assesses
    effect on other variable(s)
  • Vary number of items in a memory list
  • Different drugs to different rats
  • Allows inference of causation
  • List length affects memory
  • Drugs differentially affect lever pressing
  • Non-experimental study
  • Purely observational
  • Measure naturally occurring variables and examine
    relationships
  • Row of classroom, exam grade
  • Can't be sure about causation

8
Non-experimental Studies
  • Measure variables without influencing
  • Row of classroom, exam grade
  • Time spent outside, depression
  • Bicycles currently owned, lifetime head injuries
    (6, 4)
  • Apples per week, colds per year
  • Correlation
  • Relationship between variables, in terms of what
    values co-occur
  • More apples, fewer colds
  • Smarter people tend to like the color red
  • All that can be inferred from non-experimental
    studies
  • Does not say what causes what
  • Problems with inferring causation
  • Reverse causation
  • Third variable problem
  • Self-selection

9
Reverse Causation
  • Researcher expects X causes Y, but actually Y
    causes X
  • Depression and time outdoors
  • Might predict outdoors alleviates depression
  • Might find such a correlation
  • But, depression might reduce desire for activity
  • X?Y or Y?X both mean X and Y co-occur
  • If you only measure co-occurrence, cant tell
    difference
  • Solution Intervention
  • Manipulate X
  • Any resulting effect on Y must be caused by X,
    not vice versa

Depression
Depr(Outdoor Group) lt Depr(Indoor Group)
10
Third-variable Problem
  • X and Y might co-vary because theyre both caused
    by Z
  • Apples and colds
  • Overall health-consciousness could increase
    apples and reduce colds
  • People who eat more apples would also tend to get
    fewer colds
  • But, no direct causal relationship
  • Solution Intervention (again)
  • Manipulate X
  • Shouldnt affect Z
  • Any effect on Y must be direct

Colds(Apple Group) lt Colds(No-apple Group)
11
Self-selection
  • Differences between groups of people can be due
    to who chooses to be in which group
  • Not necessarily consequence of group membership
  • Math GREs by major
  • Physics majors might do better than Psych
  • Does physics make you better at math?
  • Kids good at math more likely to choose Physics
  • Height by sport
  • Playing basketball makes you taller?
  • Effects of alternative medicine
  • Can view as reverse causation
  • Being tall makes you better at basketball
  • Can view as 3rd-variable problem
  • Math aptitude affects both major choice and GRE

12
Experiments
  • Independent variable (IV)
  • Manipulated by researcher
  • Drug/placebo, training time, priming
  • Dependent variable (DV)
  • Measured by researcher
  • Pain tolerance, proficiency, reaction time
  • Intervention assures causality

13
Confounds and Control
  • Importance of experimental control
  • Only manipulate the IV
  • Hold everything else constant
  • Confound
  • Variable that accidentally covaries with IV
  • Subject expectations about drug effects
  • Familiarity with experimental context
  • Control means not having confounds
  • Necessary for knowing effect is due to IV

14
Random Assignment
  • Values of IV must be chosen at random for each
    subject
  • Only way to assure causal relationship
  • 3rd variable again
  • Outright cheating
  • Time of semester

15
Quasi-independent Variables
  • Some variables cant be manipulated, but can be
    used to create groups
  • Sex, age, birthplace
  • Sometimes causal direction is obvious
  • Height, men vs. women
  • Hockey enjoyment, Canadians vs. Americans
  • Allows non-experimental study to be treated like
    an experiment
  • Grouping variable is quasi-independent
  • Can treat other variables like DVs

16
Review
  • Test rats in a maze, half in morning, half at
    night. Measure how long each rat takes to learn.
  • Time to learn is a(n)
  • Variable
  • Hypothesis
  • Experiment
  • Datum

17
Review
  • Test rats in a maze, half in morning, half at
    night. Measure how long each rat takes to learn.
  • Rats are smarter in the morning is a(n)
  • Variable
  • Hypothesis
  • Experiment
  • Datum

18
Review
  • Test rats in a maze, half in morning, half at
    night. Measure how long each rat takes to learn.
  • The 3rd rat takes 530. This is a(n)
  • Variable
  • Hypothesis
  • Experiment
  • Datum

19
Review
  • Test rats in a maze, half in morning, half at
    night. Measure how long each rat takes to learn.
  • You randomly decide which group each rat is
    in.This is a(n)
  • Experiment
  • Non-experimental study

20
Review
  • Do the same with people, and let them decide
    which time to sign up for.
  • This is a(n)
  • Experiment
  • Non-experimental study
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com