Title: Modeling Technology Transitions under Increasing Returns, Uncertainty, and Heterogeneous Agents
1Modeling Technology Transitions under Increasing
Returns, Uncertainty, and Heterogeneous Agents
- Tieju Ma
- Transition to New Technology (TNT)
- International Institute for Applied Systems
Analysis
2Three missing stylized facts in traditional
technological change models
- Increasing returns to adoption (Endogenous
technological learning) - Uncertainty
- Heterogeneous agents following diverse technology
development and adoption strategies.
3Technological learning (Increasing return)
Reductions of investment costs for three
representative new and advanced
technologies Source Nebojsa Nakicenovic,
Technological change and diffusion as a learning
process
4Uncertainty
Range of Future Investment Cost Distributions
from the IIASA Technology Inventory for Biomass,
Nuclear, and Solar Electricity-Generation
Technologies, in US(1990) per kilowatt
(KW). Sources Messener and Strubegger (1991)
Nakicenovic et al. (1998)
5Heterogeneous agents (actors)
- Traditional model assume a global social
planner - In reality, there are different actors with
heterogeneous attributes, e.g. different attitude
to risk.
6Purpose
- Model endogenous technology transitions under the
three important "stylized facts" governing
technological change. - The main objective of the model is for
exploratory modeling purposes and as a heuristic
research device to examine in depth the impacts
of alternative model formulations on the
endogenous technology transition dynamics.
7A highly stylized model-- Inspired by energy and
climate change policy models
- One primary resource, whose extraction costs
increase over time as a function of resource
depletion. - One homogeneous good, the demand for which
increases over time. - Three technologies
- Existing -- entirely mature, constant cost and
efficiency, high emission - Incremental -- slight efficiency advantage,
higher initial cost (2), potential for
technological learning (10), low emission - Revolutionary -- requires no resource input, much
higher initial cost (40) , higher learning
potential (30), no emission - Optimization model
8Uncertainty in the model
- Uncertain learning rate the learning rates are
treated as random values characterized by a
distribution function. - Uncertain carbon tax. The existence, magnitude
and the timing of introducing carbon tax are
treated as uncertain, characterized by different
distribution functions. - We generate N sample of random variables, and
then the average cost resulted from
overestimating or underestimating the variables
is added into objective function. - Solutions are optimal hedging strategies against
risk.
9Simulations with one agent
Deterministic learning
10Historical technology substitution patterns
Competition among multiple technologies. The
share of steel production in the United States by
five different methods. From 1850 to
Source Nakicenovic (1990) Grubler etc (1999)
11Pareto optimization with two heterogeneous agents
Pareto Optimality The "best that could be
achieved without disadvantaging at least one
group." (Allan Schick, in Louis C. Gawthrop,
l970, p.32)
- Different risk attitude and different weights
- Trading on good
- Trading on resource
- Technology spillover
12Simulation with two agents and technology
spillover
Pioneer
Follower
13Diffusion pattern in real world
Diffusion between leading and laggard
markets Source Grubler and Nakicenovic (1991)
14Carbon abatement
15Concluding remarks
- The highly stylized model and simulations can
enhance peoples imagination about how the three
stylized facts impact technological change
processes. - In addition, the simulation results can give some
policy implications for both risk-taking and
risk-aversion decision makers, e.g., for
risk-aversion agent, it is better to import a new
technology from risk-taking agent at the niche
market stage of the new technology, instead of
waiting until the new technology being mature. - History (story) -based VS Equation-based
16Thanks for your attention!