BlindAid: a Virtual Exploration Tool for People who are Blind - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

BlindAid: a Virtual Exploration Tool for People who are Blind

Description:

The Theory Blinds exploration Spatial cognitive map Knowledge technology Spatial cognitive map The Theory Blinds cognitive ... Haptic Properties Seven ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: vrp5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BlindAid: a Virtual Exploration Tool for People who are Blind


1
BlindAid a Virtual Exploration Tool for People
who are Blind
O. Lahav, Ph.D., D. Schloerb, Ph.D., S. Kumar,
and M. A. Srinivasan, Ph.D Touch Lab, RLE,
MIT CT13, San Diego, June 2008
2
The Theory
Spatial cognitive map
Blinds exploration
Knowledge technology
3
The Theory
Blinds cognitive map
Spatial cognitive map
Blinds exploration
Knowledge technology
KT devices for spatial cognitive mapping
OM KT devices for blind
4
BlindAid System 2004 - present (NEI - R21)
5
Research Aims
  1. Design and develop a VE system for users
    who are blind
  2. Conduct experiments on the usability of the VE
    system

6
BlindAid System - Conclusion
Avoid overload processing
Clear
Back to simple
Intuitive
Based on previous knowledge
7
The Learning Mode User Interface
8
The Learning Mode Researcher Interface
9
Methodology Participants
The study included four total blind participants
41-53 years old one participant was
congenitally blind one was female
10
Methodology Research Instruments
Implementation Instruments Unknown simulated
space (13 virtual environments) Exploration
task Collection of the Data Instruments
Observations Usability questionnaire Open
interview Modeling kit Computer log
11
Research Studies
First study - Haptic properties Second study -
Audio properties Third study - Exploration tools
12
First Study Haptic Properties
Which haptic feedback properties used in the VE
strongly affected people who are blind? The VE
consisted of 20 objects of three types
Different stiffness properties S (soft-hard)
Different texture properties T (smooth-rigid)
Different stiffnesstexture properties ST
13
First Study Haptic Properties
Seven objects randomly chosen over six VEs
14
First Study Haptic Properties Result
All participants preferred objects with S
properties then T or ST properties All
seven S objects were listed as
preferable Participants preferred objects with
T properties only with large height
irrespective of the type of bump
15
First Study Haptic Properties Result
All participants preferred a limited number of
feedbacks Different haptic feedbacks
(wall,window, and door) Hard objects and soft
objects Designation of area or objects with
safety issues
16
Second Study - Audio Properties
Which audio feedback properties used in the VE
strongly affected people who are blind? Audio
type mono, stereo, or stereo with rotation
Components description short or long Hearcon
versa audio-labeled Background sound
17
Second Study Audio Properties
Six VEs
18
Second Study Audio Properties Result
Three participants chose stereo. Stereo helped
them determine which direction to go and provided
more orientation to the overall space. The
stereo-rotation was an additional variable that
they needed to track. They continually needed to
imagine their orientation at the time they heard
the audio feedback.
19
Second Study Audio Properties Result
The short components description and hearcon
need to be clear, recognizable, and short,
without the need to process it. The ability to
have background sound (e.g., street noise)
continuously with the stereo effect was effective
and needed. The participants did not report
feeling overloaded by the audio effect or try to
avoid interaction with the VE components.
20
Third Study Exploration Tools
What are the exploration tools that maximized the
participants exploration performance in the VE?
Move the VE workspace Using the arrow keys
Using the phantom button Install and recall
landmarks by User Researcher Zoom in - Zoom
out (eliminate objects)
21
Third Study Exploration Tools
22
Third Study Exploration Tools Result
Each of the four participants chose to use the
phantom button Much more intuitive and a
natural motion for the participants More
immediately associated with the white cane
Sense of having control over movements Did not
have to take their hands off the Phantom Able
to drag the workspace at an angle In a complex
VE the participants used mostly their own
landmarks, and they usually installed two of
their own.
23
BlindAid System - Conclusion
Avoid overload processing
Clear
Back to simple
Intuitive and a natural
Based on previous knowledge
24
BlindAid System - Future
To Collect spatial information in advance
(Mapquest) Integrating the system in traditional
OM trainee
25
BlindAid System Acknowledgments
The participants NIH / NEI - R21 Jay
Desloge Carroll Center for the Blind
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com