Screening%20and%20Surveillance%20of%20Autism%20and%20Related%20Disabilities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Screening%20and%20Surveillance%20of%20Autism%20and%20Related%20Disabilities

Description:

Screening and Surveillance of Autism and Related Disabilities How to Change One s Clinical Practice Statewide Autism System of Care Funded by Florida Developmental ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:230
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: DavidC323
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Screening%20and%20Surveillance%20of%20Autism%20and%20Related%20Disabilities


1
Screening and Surveillance of Autism and Related
Disabilities
How to Change Ones Clinical Practice

Statewide Autism System of Care Funded by Florida
Developmental Disabilities Council Health-Care
Task Force
2
  • One of the doctors we took Gary to told us, Well
    if hes autistic he could just snap out of it ,
    like amnesia. I thought to myself, Dont hold
    your breath.

3
Learning Objectives
  • Discuss why early screening and surveillance is
    important.
  • Define red flags of autism spectrum disorders.
  • Review developmental screening tools.
  • List barriers preventing change in practice.
  • Describe model for improving screening practices.
  • Create aim statement for changing practice.
  • Develop next steps to initiate practice change.

4
Part 1 Autism Spectrum DisordersImportance of
Early Screening
5
Autism Spectrum Disorders
  • Social-communicative disorder
  • Triad of impairments
  • Socialization
  • Verbal and nonverbal communication
  • Restricted and repetitive patterns of behaviors
  • Unknown etiology, but with strong genetic basis

6
What are the Red Flags?
  • Inappropriate gaze
  • Lack of sharing enjoyment or interest
  • Little or no response to name when called
  • Lack of coordinated facial expression, gesture,
    and sound
  • Lack of showing
  • Unusual intonation and/or pitch of voice
  • Repetitive movements of posturing of body, arms,
    hands, or fingers
  • Repetitive movements with objects

Wetherby et al., 2004
7
Absolute Indications for Immediate Evaluation
  • No babbling pointing or other gesture by 12
    months
  • No single words by 16 months
  • No 2-word spontaneous (not echolalic) phrases by
    24 months
  • ANY loss of ANY language or social skills at ANY
    age

8
Are We Missing The Boat?
  • Average age for diagnosis in United States is 3
    to 4 years (Filipek, 1999).
  • Average age for screening/referral ranges from 24
    to 40 months.
  • However, recommended age for referral by
  • 18 months.
  • Most physicians rely on their clinical judgment,
    yet clinical judgment detects fewer than 30 of
    children who have developmental disabilities
    (Glascoe, 2000 Palfrey, 1994).
  • Research shows that using modified developmental
    checklists are not adequate for detecting
    developmental delays (Committee on Children with
    Disabilities, 1994).

9
Early ScreeningWhy?
  • Intensive early intervention before age 3 results
    in greater impact after age 5 (Wetherby et al.,
    2004).
  • Presence of neurologic plasticity at younger ages
  • Better school placement outcomes (general
    education vs. special education) (Harris
    Handelman, 2000)
  • Better chance of graduating from high school
  • Greater developmental gains
  • Higher likelihood to live independently
  • Positive economic impact over a life-time with
    early intervention

10
General Developmental Screeners
  • Recommended General Screening Tools
  • Ages Stages Questionnaires (ASQ)
  • Child Development Inventories (CDI)
  • Parents Evaluations of Developmental Status
    (PEDS)
  • Infant/Toddler Checklist for Communication and
    Language Development
  • Communication and Symbolic Behavior Developmental
    Profile (CSBSDP)

11
Autism Specific Screeners
  • The Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (CHAT)
    (Baron-Cohen, 1992)
  • Pervasive Developmental Disorder Screening Test
    (PDDST) (Siegel, 1998)
  • Modified Checklist for Autism in toddlers
    (M-CHAT) (Robins, Fein, Barton, 1999)

12
Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status
(PEDS)
  • Relies on information from parents
  • Can be used in patients birth to 8 years
  • Screens for both developmental and behavioral
    problems
  • Consists of 10 questions (4th-5th grade reading
    level)
  • Can be used during well-child visits, while
    parents are waiting for appointments- takes about
    2 minutes .
  • Available in English, Spanish, and Vietnamese
  • Standardized scoring procedures
  • Total cost (including materials and
    administration) is 1.19 per patient

13
Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)
  • Relies on information from parents
  • Can be used in patients 4 months to 5 years
  • Screens for developmental problems
    personal/social
  • Takes 10-15 minutes to complete
  • Separate 3-4 page form for each well-child visit
    (age-specific)
  • Available in English, Spanish, French, and Korean
  • Standardized scoring procedures
  • No cost associated with tool can photocopy

14
Easy Road from Screening to Dx
  • AAP recommends using a general developmental
    screening tool at all well-child visits
  • If pass, re-screen at next well-child visit
  • If fail, perform appropriate tests (e.g.,
    hearing, lead levels, etc.)
  • If test results are normal then refer patient to
    subspecialist and/or Early Steps

15
Perceived Barriers
  • What prevents healthcare providers from changing
    their practice?
  • Lack of information
  • Lack of time
  • Lack of sufficient money/resources
  • Lack of necessary staff
  • _________________ (fill in the blank)

16
Concrete Barriers
  • Patient waiting time before seeing physician
  • Total visit time
  • Utilization of screening tools/instruments
  • Concern with emotional impact on family
  • Tracking patients with behavioral and/or
    developmental problems
  • Knowledge of appropriate referral resources
  • Appropriate documentation, billing/coding

17
Part 2Changing Clinical Practices
18
  • Content adapted from The Improvement Guide, A
    Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational
    Performance, by Gerald J. Langley et. al,
    Jossey-Bass, 1996. Figure copied from Education
    in Quality Improvement for Pediatric Practice
    (www.eqipp.org)

Taken from Education in Quality Improvement for
Pediatric Practice (www.eqipp.org)
19
An Effective Aim Statement is
  • Clear. The statement should be read and
    understood, without interpretation. What is
    trying to be accomplished?
  • Numerical. There are quantifiable measures in
    place to indicate progress.
  • Realistically Ambitious. The aim is set high
    enough that it will have a significant impact on
    the practice, but not so high that it is
    unrealistic.

Taken from Education in Quality Improvement for
Pediatric Practice (www.eqipp.org)
20
An Effective Aim statement is
  • Focused. The aim is defined so that the work is
    not overwhelming or discouraging, but simplifies
    the demands on ones attention.
  • Flexible. The aim should allow room for
    refinement where several different solutions to
    the performance gap (rather than just one) are
    explored.

Taken from Education in Quality Improvement for
Pediatric Practice (www.eqipp.org)
21
Aim Statement Example
  • To use PEDS or ASQ with 25 of children up to 18
    months of age within 3 months of initiation
  • 50 by 6 months
  • 75 by 9 months
  • 100 by 12 months

22
Group Activity- 5 Minutes
  • Develop an Aim Statement for using a general
    developmental screening tool in your practice.

23
PDSA Cycles
Copied from Education in Quality Improvement for
Pediatric Practice (www.eqipp.org)
24
Measurement and Data Collection
  • Key principles of measurement and data collection
  • Keep it simple - focus on a few measures
  • Don't measure everything, only things you need to
    know
  • Seek usefulness, not perfection
  • Integrate measurement into daily routine
  • Use existing data when possible
  • Plot data over time

Taken from Education in Quality Improvement for
Pediatric Practice (www.eqipp.org)
25
Ways to Approach Barriers
  • Step One Know Your Patient Flow
  • Select sample of 20-30 patients and record time
    of visit from arrival to checkout.
  • Choose day/time when wait is likely to be
    longest.
  • If patient arrives early, start counting at
    scheduled appointment time.
  • Have each station record time when encounter
    starts.
  • Review results and determine if there are ways to
    cut down on visit time.

Adapted from Office Visit Cycle Time
(www.ihi.org)
26
Ways to Approach Barriers
  • Step Two Choose Screening Instrument
  • Select desired screening instrument.
  • Choose small sample size of patients (5-10) to
    conduct instrument and record time taken to
    complete task.
  • Analyze results to determine best time to
    administer instrument.

27
Ways to Approach Barriers
  • Step Three Flagging Charts
  • Consider
  • Color-coding charts
  • Sticker system
  • Electronic medical reporting
  • Consider starting an ASD registry

28
Ways to Approach Barriers
  • Step Four Improved Documentation
  • Perform chart review on 20-30 randomly selected
    patients with known developmental concerns.
  • Examine problem lists (i.e., Are the problem
    lists completed for those with suspected
    behavioral and/or developmental concerns?).
  • Determine whether appropriate screening has been
    performed (e.g., by target age).
  • Review percentages of those that have received
    proper referral.
  • Assess quality of therapies (parent survey).

29
Ways to Approach Barriers
  • Step Five Finding Support Staff
  • Review roles/responsibilities of support staff.
  • Consider assigning data collection/surveillance
    (e.g., medical assistant, nurse).
  • Allow same person to track referrals and
    appropriate follow-up
  • Think care coordination as in the medical home
    concept.
  • Involve key staff in important brain-storming/idea
    forming sessions.

30
Example of Change in Practice to Increase Early
Screening
  • Front desk clerk hands out PEDS to parent at time
    of check-in.
  • Choose nurse/medical assistant who could best
    collect and score instrument.
  • Have parent hand over completed PEDS to above-MA
    upon being called back for vitals.
  • MA will score instrument while patient is having
    vitals checked and being placed in room.
  • Scored PEDS will be placed with chart on door to
    await physicians arrival.

31
Example of Change in Practice to Increase Early
Screening
  • If score is high/low, then MA will also place
    sticker on chart for future follow-up.
  • Physician can review PEDS with family and make
    appropriate recommendations.
  • Can be done in lieu of modified developmental
    screeners conducted by providers.
  • If 2 minutes are saved with each patient over an
    entire day, there may be enough time to schedule
    additional patients. This would likely cover the
    cost of the instrument and/or possibly increase
    income.

32
Activity- 10 Minutes
  • Develop action plan step(s) for changing YOUR
    practice to increase the use of general
    developmental screener(s)

33
Tips for Success
  • Improvement occurs in small steps.
  • Repeated attempts are often needed to refine your
    strategies or implement new ideas.
  • Assess regularly to improve or revise the plan.
  • Study failed changes for learning opportunities.
  • Plan communication to update participants.
  • Engage leadership support.
  • Celebrate success.

Adapted from Education in Quality Improvement for
Pediatric Practice (www.eqipp.org)
34
Resources
  • First Signs
  • www.firstsigns.org/
  • Education in Quality Improvement for Pediatric
    Practice
  • www.eqipp.org
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement
  • www.ihi.org
  • National Initiative for Childrens Healthcare
    Quality
  • www.nichq.org
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • www.ahrq.gov

35
Resources
  • American Academy of Pediatrics (2001). The
    pediatricians role in the diagnosis and
    management of autistic spectrum disorder in
    children. Pediatrics, 107, 1221-1226.
  • Committee on Children with Disabilities (1994).
    Screening infants and young children for
    developmental disabilities. Pediatrics, 93,
    863-865.
  • Filipek, P.A. et al., (2000). Practice
    parameter Screening and diagnosis of autism.
    Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of
    the American Academy of Neurology and the Child
    Neurology Society. Neurology, 55, 468-479.
  • Filipek, P. A., et al., (1999). The screening
    and diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorders.
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
    29, 439-484.
  • Glascoe, F. (2000). Pediatrics in Review, 21,
    272-280.
  • Harris, S., Handleman, J. (2000). Age and IQ at
    intake as predictors of placement for young
    children with autism A four-to six-year follow
    up. Journal of Autism and Developmental
    Disorders, 30, 137-142.
  • Palfrey, et al., (1994). J Peds, 111, 651-655.
  • Powers, M. D. (2000). Children with Autism A
    parents guide (2nd ed.). Bethesda Woodbine
    House.-
  • Wetherby, A. M., Woods, J., Allen, L., Cleary,
    J., Dickinson, H., Lord, C. (2004). Early
    indicators of autism spectrum disorders in the
    second year of life. Journal of Autism and
    Developmental Disorders, 34, 473-493.

36
Learning Objectives Addressed
  • Importance of early screening and surveillance.
  • Definition of Red Flags of autism spectrum
    disorders.
  • Developmental screening tools.
  • Barriers preventing change in practice.
  • A model for improving screening practices.
  • Creation of an aim statement for changing
    practice.
  • Development of next steps to initiate practice
    change.

37
Closing Thoughts
  • If I could snap my fingers and be non-autistic,
    I would not. Autism is part of what I am.
  • -Temple Grandin
  • Autism is not me. Autism is just an
    information-processing problem that controls who
    I appear to be. Autism tries to stop me from
    being free to be myself.
  • -Donna Williams

38
Discussion/Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com