Title: Challenges in remote sensing of CCN concentration An assessment based on airborne observations of AOD, CCN, chemical composition, size distribution, light scattering/absorption and humidity response over North America
1Challenges in remote sensing of CCN
concentrationAn assessment based on airborne
observations of AOD, CCN, chemical composition,
size distribution, light scattering/absorption
and humidity response over North America
- Yohei Shinozuka, Jens Redemann, Phil Russell,
John Livingston, Roy Johnson, S. Ramachandran,
Qin Zhang (NASA Ames Research Center), - Tony Clarke, Steve Howell, Volodia Kapustin, Vera
Brekhovskikh, Cameron McNaughton, Steffen Freitag
(University of Hawaii), - Terry Lathem, Thanos Nenes (Georgia Institute of
Technology) - NASA Postdoctoral Program, yohei_at_hawaii.edu
2In this talk
- Goal and method
- Preliminary findings
3Goal
- To assess challenges in remote sensing of CCN
concentration - To quantify uncertainties associated with
- aerosol chemical composition,
- size distribution,
- humidity response of light extinction and
- vertical structure,
- using ARCTAS data.
4Andreae, ACP 2009 Campaign averages.
5AOD and CCN Concentration
- The CCN concentration can be constrained by AOD
to within a factor of 3
Georgia Tech
AATS-14
6AOD and CCN Concentration
- The CCN concentration can be constrained by AOD
to within a factor of 3, and
- by the light extinction of dried particles, a
factor of 2.
Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech
AATS-14
HiGEAR (U. Hawaii) nephPSAP
Difference is attributable to the vertical
structure and humidity response of light
extinction.
7ARCTAS Airborne Measurements
- humidity response of light extinction (fRH nephs)
- vertical structure (AATS-14, nephPSAP, lidar)
- aerosol chemical composition (AMS, SP2)
- size distribution (DMA, OPC)
- CCN concentration (CCN counter)
- for isolating the factors affecting the
relationship of column integral optical
properties to near-surface CCN concentration.
8CCN Diameter
- The critical dry diameter at 0.3 supersaturation
(right axis) derived from direct CCN measurement
and long DMA size distribution is larger than 100
nm for 65 of ARCTAS Canada data, including
almost all in forest fire smoke (high extinction
horizontal axis) near the surface (filled
marker).
Georgia Tech CCN counter HiGEAR (U. Hawaii) long
DMA, neph, PSAP
9Comparing sunphotometer and nephPSAP measurements
450 nm
Layer AOD for vertical profiles with ?alt. gt1
km HiGEAR layer AODs were typically within
(100.02) of the AATS-14. Russell et al.
poster Thurs. PM Shinozuka et al., in
preparation
? AOD/(100 m) for segments of vertical profiles
with ?alt. 100 m.
10Example Extinction Spectra
- Two extinction spectra of
- similar near-UV extinction coefficients
- different near-IR wavelength dependences
- vastly different number concentrations
11Optically constraining particle concentration
- The number concentration of fine particles (100
400 nm) per extinction tends to increase with the
extinction Angstrom exponent for comparable
wavelengths, as expected.
12Optically constraining particle concentration
- The relationship is stratified by the wavelength
dependence of near infrared extinction.
13AATS-14 fine-mode fraction compared with in situ
data
- FMF derived from the spectral curvature after
ONeill et al. 2001. - SMF measured with nephPSAP, with and without an
impactor. - More on AATS-14 tomorrow Redemann et al. talk
815 AM, Russell et al. and Livingston et al.,
poster afternoon
14Conclusions
- Among the NASA P-3 data during ARCTAS Canada,
- the CCN concentration below 1 km can be
constrained by AOD to within a factor of 3, and
by dry extinction, 2. - The critical dry diameter derived for 0.3
supersaturation is larger than 100 nm for most
cases. - Near UV and near IR extinction helps to constrain
the number concentration of fine particles. - We are in the process of quantifying the factors
that affect the relationship of aerosol optical
properties to near-surface CCN concentration.
15Extra slides
16Including all altitudes, note the log scale.
17Figures not used in the text.
The hygroscopicity parameterization by Petters
and Kreidenweis 2007
Approximation where ? is large,
? is a function of critical diameter (Dd) and
supersaturation (Sc), when surface tension (ss/a)
and temperature (T) are assumed to be
constant. Dd ?(-1/3) 70 nm at 0.2
supersaturation
18aerosol composition and smoke type
19White smoke from smoldering fires
White smoldering and black flaming identified
based on Tony Clarkes flight report.
Dark smoke from flaming fires
20Smoke after evolution, or pollution from other
sources? To be investigated.
White smoke from smoldering fires
Aerosol evolution in downwind transport?
Characterization of smoke types and age with the
wavelength dependence of scattering and SSA
Dark smoke from flaming fires