Title: AGREMENT SOUTH AFRICA innovative construction products assessment
1AGREMENT SOUTH AFRICAinnovative construction
products assessment
2What is Agrément?
- The word Agrément is French and it means
consent or approval. The Board of AGREMENT SOUTH
AFRICA was established in 1969 as an objective,
independent agency which evaluates the
fitness-for-purpose of non-standardised
construction products.
3Structure of Agrément
- Board of Agrément South Africa
- Technical Agency Technical Committee
- Experts
4Why Agrément?
- Specialises in non-standard products (more than
30 years of experience) - More than 350 certificates
- Complements SABS
- International links with WFTAO
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9Certification/Specification/Guarantee
- Certificate
- What can it do
- Specification
- How to do it
- Guarantee
- It will work for a certain period,
- otherwise you may be compensated
-
10Why certification?
- Facilitates acceptance of new products and saves
selling time - Supports innovation and promotional drives
- Assures customers that a QA system is implemented
- Technical evaluation may lead to product
improvements
11Certification Process
Product submitted to Agrément SA
Owner of Product
Quality Management System developed ito ISO
9000 requirements
Evaluation committee formed
Submitted to SABS for adjudication
- Planning of evaluation
- programme
- product classification
- selection of tests
- special considerations
Feedback and reporting
- Materials testing
- material preparation
- ageing/conditioning
- performance testing
- Feedback reporting
- discussion of results
- technical report
- technical summary
Preparation of certificate by Agrément South
Africa agency
If satisfactory, certificate submitted to Board
for approval
12Checks and Balances
- Initial screening by Agency
- Evaluation by experts
- CSIR and others
- Different experts for different aspects
- SABS
- Review by Agency
- Technical Committee
- Board
13Quality
- Credibility
- Manufacturing
- On site
14Agrément Appraisal
- Based on more than a single test result
- Takes into account many factors, including
quality management - Results in certificate of fitness-for-purpose
that enables specifiers to make informed decisions
15Approach to performance evaluation
- Relative rather than absolute evaluation
- Performance is compared to that of standard
products - Relies on benchmarking and expert evaluation
- Challenge Cooperation
16Why avoid absolute performance evaluation?
- Requires a validated and quantified relationship
between performance and test indicators - Indicator-performance relationships are not well
validated at present
17Relative performance evaluation
- Provides evaluation of performance relative to
standard products - Identifies product strengths and weaknesses
- Facilitates judgement re engineering and economic
advantages/life cycle costing
18Progress to date(bituminous products)
- Performance criteria established
- Test methods and indicators proposed
- Reviewed by local and international peers
- Applications invited for pilot projects
- Inertia/reluctance in the market
19Current status
- Invited applications for bituminous products
- Developing criteria for bridge deck joints
- Examining possibility of introducing
certification system for road stabilisers used on
unpaved roads
20The way ahead
- Pilot bituminous product evaluations
- Authorities insist on Agrément certification for
innovative and non-standardised products - Clauses in tender documentation/project
specification - Cooperation between Agrément South Africa and
Road Pavements Forum - Regular feedback to Forum
- Information sharing on products tested
- Technical Committees
21(No Transcript)
22WFTAO
- 25 members from 21 countries
- Facilitates transfer of national products to the
global market place - Assessments accepted by all WFTAO members - but
criteria might differ - Co-operation and exchange of information
23Test Report vs Appraisal
- Test report - single aspect
- Agrément appraisal - comprehensive
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)