DENGUE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL PROGRAM IN MALAYSIA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

DENGUE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL PROGRAM IN MALAYSIA

Description:

Title: Prevention of Injuries Author: mich Last modified by: Dr.Adibah Created Date: 8/1/2003 8:56:36 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:603
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: mich1201
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DENGUE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL PROGRAM IN MALAYSIA


1
DENGUE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL PROGRAMIN
MALAYSIA
  • DR ROSE NANI MUDIN
  • DISEASE CONTROL DIVISION
  • MINISTRY OF HEALTH
  • 13 JAN 2009

2
OUTLINES OF PRESENTATION
  • Epidemiology of Dengue in Malaysia
  • Dengue Mortality
  • Control Activities Strategies
  • Conclusion

3
INCIDENCE RATE OF REPORTED DENGUE CASES IN
MALAYSIA (1981 - 2008)
4
NUMBER OF REPORTED DENGUE FEVER AND DENGUE
HAEMORRHAGIC FEVER CASES IN MALAYSIA, 1995 2007
5
DISTRIBUTION OF REPORTED DENGUE CASES IN MALAYSIA
BY EPIDEMIOLOGY WEEK (20062008)
Epid. Week
5
6
COMPARISION OF DENGUE CASES BY STATE (2007
2008)
NO. OF CASES
6
2008
2007
6
7
THE DENGUE INCIDENCE RATE BY STATE (2008)
78
86
80
150
33
LABUAN
150
179
157
62
88
408
141
WPKL
334
110
MALAYSIA 178 cases/100,000population
118
8
PATTERN OF DENGUE CASES
9
RATIO OF DHF DF IN MALAYSIA 1998 2008
DHF DF RATIO
9
10
PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF DENGUE CASES BY
LOCALITY IN MALAYSIA (1998 2008)
10
11

11
11
12
DHF AND DF FATALITY RATES FOR MALAYSIA (1990-2008)
13
DISTRIBUTION OF DENGUE DEATH CASES BY AGE GROUP
(1997 2007)
NO. OF CASES
YEAR
14
FINDINGS OF DENGUE CASES ANALYSISFOR 2008
14
15
DISTRIBUTION OF DENGUE CASES BY GENDER
15
16
DISTIRBUTION OF DENGUE CASES BY AGE GROUP
16
17
FINDINGS OF VEKPRO ANALYSIS FOR 2008 (Epid wk 1-
49)
State of Cases Fulfilling ClinicalCriteria of Positive Serology from All Cases with Results Cases Notified by Primary Care Clinics Cases Diagnosed 3 d from Onset Premises of Cases Fogged lt 5 d from Onset
Perlis 81.8 63.0 8.5 37.4 39.2
Kedah 65.9 55.2 1.1 46.5 31.5
P. Pinang 33.0 75.7 1.1 50.4 36.5
Perak 64.0 97.5 1.3 38.9 30.1
Selangor 95.8 91.7 5.7 31.7 13.5
WPKL 8.0 84.7 0.9 34.4 7.8
N. Sembilan 78.0 99.1 0.6 30.9 21.9
Melaka 65.7 99.5 0.2 35.9 29.9
Johor 93.7 84.3 0.2 32.7 19.6
Pahang 85.5 84.5 1.4 34.1 24.3
Terengganu 81.1 51.5 1.3 36.9 35.6
Kelantan 88.1 75.4 3.6 28.1 17.8
Sabah 45.5 79.1 3.3 35.2 18.2
WP Labuan 28.6 35.6 0 62.9 55.7
Putrajaya 56.8 100.0 14.5 25.5 7.8
Sarawak 37.1 90.3 10.9 42.0 18.2
MALAYSIA 74.2 85.4 3.4 34.5 18.8
17
18
DENGUE MORTALITY ANALYSIS2008
18
19
DENGUE MORTALITY
  • 112 dengue deaths reported for 2008 (98 cases in
    2007
  • Only 62 cases were reviewed by the state
    mortality review committee

19
20
DISTRIBUTION OF DENGUE MORTALITY BY AGEGROUP
20
21
DURATION BETWEEN TIME OF ONSET AND ADMISSION
21
22
DURATION BETWEEN TIME OF ADMISSION AND DEATH
22
23
CAUSE OF DEATH
DIAGNOSIS OF MORTALITY CASES
Fulfillment of WHO Case Definition (WHO 1997) Percentage of Cases
DF 0
DHF 11
DSS 89
Immediate Cause of death Percentage of Cases
Shock Syndrome 61.8
End/Multi organ failure 40.0
Severe bleeding from GIT/DIVC/Thrombocytopenia 32.7
ARDS 10.9
Sepsis (including Nosocomial infection) 10.9
Others (specify) Hyperkalemia with ARF 12.7
23
24
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS FOR DENGUE MORTALITY
N0. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
1. PATIENT CAME IN ALREADY TOO ILL 47.3
2. DELAY IN DIAGNOSIS/ ASSESSMENT OF SEVERITY
Low index of suspicion 36.4
Delay in review by doctor 14.5
Late referral 9.1
Results delayed/not traced/not reviewed 7.3
Infrequent investigation ordered 7.3
Others 16.4
24
25
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS FOR DENGUE MORTALITY
N0. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
3. INADEQUATE MONITORING/TREATMENT
Inadequate fluid resuscitation 21.8
Failure to recognize DSS 20.0
Insufficient blood products given 18.2
Inadequate monitoring of vital signs 16.4
Overloading/pulmonary oedema 16.4
Delay in seeking ICU care 14.5
Inadequate monitoring of FBC 10.9
DIVC not suspected/recognized 1.8
4. CO MORBID CONDITIONS
Obesity 14.5
Extremes of age (lt1yr / gt60yrs) 9.1
Others Uncontrolled DM/HPT Hepatitis, Fits 18.2
25
53 of the death were preventable
26
Key Components of Dengue Control Strategy
  • Early diagnosis and treatment
  • Training of frontliners
  • Health education to public on importance of early
    diagnosis and treatment
  • Active case detection in outbreak localities
  • Prompt notification
  • Within 24 hours
  • By phone
  • Nearest District Health Office
  • Case Investigation within 24 hours
  • Prompt vector control response
  • Within 24 hours of notification
  • Fogging within 200 m radius
  • 400 m if outbreak locality
  • Quality Assurance Program -Dengue Outbreak
    Control Index (DOCI) 100 outbreak controlled
    within 14 days

27
Key Components of Dengue Control Strategy
  • Proper Case Management
  • CPG- The Management Of Dengue Infection In
    Adult/Children (2nd Edition)
  • All dengue death are audited immediately.
  • Appropriate remedial actions are taken by the
    relevant parties and report to be sent to the
    Disease Control Division within 2 weeks
  • Health Education And Community Mobilization
  • Production of health materials/ mass media
  • Guidelines on health education and community
    mobilization activities in outbreak localities
  • Guidelines on COMBI For Dengue Prevention and
    Control

28
CHALLENGES IN THE DENGUE PREVENTION ACTIVITIES
  • Health seeking behavior of the dengue patient
  • Only 4 of cases were from the clinic and
    majority from hospital
  • 50 of the dengue mortality cases were admitted
    on day 4 or 5 after onset - delay in seeking
    treatment
  • 47 of dengue mortality cases came in already ill
  • Difficult to break the dengue virus transmission
  • Only 35 of patient diagnosed within 3 days from
    the onset of illness
  • Only 19 of dengue cases residence were fogged
    within 5 days of onset of illness
  • Thus other patients infected with the dengue
    virus may still transmit the disease

28
29
CHALLENGES IN THE DENGUE PREVENTION ACTIVITIES
  • Low index of suspicion of dengue cases by the
    attending doctors
  • Delayed notification
  • Delay in giving appropriate treatment
  • Lack in community cooperation and participation
    in the dengue prevention and control activities

29
30
CONCLUSION-1
  • To strengthen the implementation of dengue
    prevention and control measure (to be alert and
    responsive)
  • Ensure effective and efficient performance of the
    control activities through
  • Monitoring supervision
  • Analysis of data at district, state, and MOH level

31
CONCLUSION-2
  • Strengthen the prevention and control activities
    at district and state level
  • Facilitate training for healthcare workers to
    increase knowledge and skills on the dengue
    management and vector control
  • Continuous monitoring of dengue status and
    mortality at all levels, as to address
    uncontrolled situation of the disease

32
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com