CLASS 13 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

CLASS 13

Description:

Title: Scientific Theories: Concepts and constructs Author: Del Paulhus Last modified by: Paulhus Created Date: 1/3/2000 8:16:21 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:79
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: DelP187
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CLASS 13


1
CLASS 13
2
Approach 3Beyond g
3
Spearman says g underliesall intelligence
  • But we all know someone who..
  • Most people think and some researchers agree
    that
  • Intelligence is more than g, as evaluated by
    standard tests

4
Paradox ?
  • Everyone believes that some people are more
    intelligent than others
  • But everyone believes that they are above average
  • Statisticians say impossible !

5
Psychologists say no paradox
  • Dunning solves the paradox
  • Our personal definitions ensure that we are above
    average
  • What other definitions have a legitimate basis?

6
  • Gardners multiple intelligences
  • TRADITIONAL
  • Logical-mathematical Linguistic
  • Spatial Inter-personal (social)
  • CONTROVERSIAL
  • Intra-personal Musical
  • Kinesthetic Naturalist
  • Spiritual

7
Gardners latest
  • Replaced Spiritual intelligence with
  • Existential intelligence
  • Moral intelligence

8
Here are some recent nomineesWhich type of
intelligence does each have?
9
Albert Einstein

Logical-mathematical intelligence
10
Oprah Winfrey
Interpersonal intelligence
11
Gary Kasparov
Spatial intelligence
12
Eminem Linguistic intelligence
13
Sigmund Freud
Intra-personal Intelligence
14
Sidney Crosby
Kinesthetic intelligence
15
Mahatma Ghandi
Spiritual intelligence
16
David Suzuki
Naturalist intelligence
17
But where is creativity?Suggestions for other
intelligences?
18
Critique of Gardners approach
  • Mostly subjective opinion
  • Many of the intelligences are too vague to be
    measured
  • Without measures, no practical value yet
  • Cynical view everyone needs to feel intelligent
    and Gardner just wants to make us all happy

19
Empirical components
20
  • Spearman (1 g)
  • Wechsler (2)
  • Cattell (2)
  • Thurstone (7)
  • Guilford (120)

21
Scholastic aptitude
  • Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT)
  • 3 subscales (math, reading, writing)
  • Graduate Record Exam (GRE) -- 3
  • LSAT, MCAT, GMAT (2-3 subscales)

22
Thurstones 7 Primary Abilities
  • Vocabulary
  • Spatial
  • Verbal fluency
  • Perceptual scanning
  • Problem solving
  • Arithmetic
  • Memory

F M F F M F
23
Why sex differences?
  • Nature Brain differences ?
  • Nurture sex roles ?

24
e.g. spatial ability
25
Sex differences in GRE
  • Verbal females
  • Math males
  • Analytic (being phased out) males
  • Essay (new) females

26
Sex differences in g
  • No sex differences on Stanford-Binet
  • Coincidence ?

27
Summary
  • Several empirical components are reliably
    distinguished
  • Many conceptual intelligences not yet measured
  • Traditional sex differences are diminishing but
    still evident

28
Emotional Intelligence
29
  • Being good at perceiving, understanding, and
    expressing emotions
  • More important than IQ?
  • But how to measure?
  • One approach is to test ability to judge emotions
    accurately.

30
Q What emotion?
A Sadness, as judged by the person who made the
drawing
31
Q what emotion?
A grief -as judged by consensus based on
context
32
A Surprise -- based on instructions to pose.
33
Q what emotion is aroused?
A inspiration as judged by emotion experts
34
Q What emotion?
A the joy of using Play Station 3, as judged by
the manufacturer.
35
Critique of EQ
  • Difficult to evaluate emotion accuracy
  • Self-reports are dubious
  • Is emotional intelligence something else?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com