Is upper endoscopy indicated in persons with a positive FOBT and a negative colonoscopy in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program ? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Is upper endoscopy indicated in persons with a positive FOBT and a negative colonoscopy in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program ?

Description:

Is upper endoscopy indicated in persons with a positive FOBT and a negative colonoscopy in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program ? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: DrAn63
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Is upper endoscopy indicated in persons with a positive FOBT and a negative colonoscopy in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program ?


1
Is upper endoscopy indicated in persons with a
positive FOBT and a negative colonoscopy in a
population-based colorectal cancer screening
program ?
Bernard DENIS, Philippe PERRIN, Frédéric VAGNE,
André PETER, Jean Christophe PFEIFFER, Daniel
BATTISTELLI
Association pour le Dépistage du Cancer
colorectal dans le Haut-Rhin (ADECA 68), Colmar,
FRANCE
2
background
  • assessment of both feasibility and efficiency of
    a nation wide population-based colorectal cancer
    (CRC) FOBT screening program
  • 22 pilot areas

3
background
  • whether upper endoscopy is necessary is
    controversial
  • few studies, most small sized, retrospective or
    individual screening
  • only 2 in mass screening programs which
    concluded that upper endoscopy was unjustified in
    asymptomatic persons but
  • (Thomas WM Gut 1990 Rasmussen M Scand J
    Gastroenterol 2002)

4
aim
  • to assess whether upper endoscopy
    is indicated in persons with
    a positive FOBT and
    a negative colonoscopy in a
    population-based CRC screening
    program ?

5
methods
  • pilot population-based
    colorectal cancer
    screening program
  • Haut-Rhin 0.71 million inhabitants
  • all average risk residents aged 50-74 y
  • biennial non rehydrated guaiac FOBT (Hemoccult
    II) without dietary restriction

6
methods
  • prospective recording
    all upper endoscopies performed after positive
    FOBT and negative colonoscopy
  • data collection
  • detailed history (upper GI symptoms, drugs,
    documented anemia)
  • upper abnormal findings
  • changes in management
  • adverse events

7
methods
  • inclusion criteria
  • Residents aged 50-74 y participating to CRC
    screening program
  • Positive FOBT
  • Complete colonoscopy
  • No lower bleeding lesion, CRC or polyp 1 cm
  • At the discretion of the endoscopist
  • Informed consent

8
methods
  • exclusion criteria
  • FOBT completed out of screening program
  • Incomplete colonoscopy
  • Lower bleeding lesion, CRC or polyp 1 cm
  • Documented upper GI disease
  • Recent upper endoscopy lt 1 year
  • Patient refusal

9
methods
10
results
  • ongoing study April 2005 (19 months)
  • 366 upper endoscopies / 1002 (36.6)
  • 305 (50.4 ) with normal colonoscopy
  • 61 (15.4 ) with colorectal polyps lt 1 cm

11
diagnostic yield
80 / 366 (21.9 ) abnormal upper GI
findings
  • 1 pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma
  • 3 Barretts esophagus
  • 33 reflux esophagitis (28 gr. 1 / 5 gr.
    2)
  • 2 angiodysplasia
  • 12 gastric polyps
  • 26 erosive gastritis
  • 1 gastric ulcer
  • 5 erosive duodenitis
  • 2 duodenal ulcers
  • 18 Hp positive

12
diagnostic yield
age lt 65 46 (21.5) gt 65 34 (22.5) NS
colonoscopy normal 61 (20) polyps 19 (31.1) NS
doc. anemia present 0 (0) absent 58 (20.5) -
aspirin present 12 (27.9) absent 49 (19.6) NS
NSAID present 8 (33.3) absent 53 (19.9) NS
gender male 43 (27.6) female 37 (17.7) p0.02
upper symptoms present 29 (37.2) absent 32 (15) plt0.01
13
clinical impact
50 / 366 (15 ) change in clinical
management
  • 1 surgery
  • 1 Argon plasma coagulation
  • 46 PPI
  • 18 antibiotics
  • 4 NSAID discontinuation
  • 3 endoscopic follow-up

14
clinical impact
age lt 65 31 (14.5) gt 65 24 (15.8) NS
colonoscopy normal 42 (13.8) polyps 13 (21.3) NS
doc. anemia present 0 (0) absent 41 (14.5) -
aspirin present 10 (23.3) absent 34 (13.6) NS
NSAID present 7 (29.2) absent 37 (13.9) -
gender male 32 (20.5) female 23 (11) p0.01
upper symptoms present 20 (25.6) absent 23 (10.8) plt0.01
15
213 asymptomatic persons
  • abnormal findings 15
  • changes in management 10.8
  • clinically important lesions 3.3
  • 3 erosive gastritis Hp
  • 3 erosive duodenitis Hp
  • 1 reflux esophagitis gr. 2
  • no cancer
  • no Barretts

16
asymptomatic persons
  • Number needed to screen to detect
    one clinically
    important lesion 30

17
conclusions
  • upper endoscopy is not justified in asymptomatic
    persons with a positive FOBT when colonoscopy is
    normal or yields small polyps in a
    population-based CRC screening program
  • upper endoscopy must be performed in patients
    with relevant upper symptoms

18
future
  • upper abnormal findings
  • positive FOBT ?
  • by chance ?
  • control group
    with colorectal cancer or large polyps
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com