Critical Load Development for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Critical Load Development for

Description:

Critical Load Development for Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition Elizabeth Waddell Air Resources Specialist Pacific West Region 206 220 4287 Elizabeth_waddell_at_nps.gov – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: CCSO6
Learn more at: http://lar.wsu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Critical Load Development for


1
  • Critical Load Development for
  • Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition
  • Elizabeth Waddell
  • Air Resources Specialist
  • Pacific West Region
  • 206 220 4287
  • Elizabeth_waddell_at_nps.gov

1
2
Science Workshop
  • Funded by NWCAA
  • Co-sponsored by NWCAA, NPS, USFS, and USGS
  • Focus on NW WA
  • but applicability for
  • most of R10

2
3
Participants
  • Researchers with expertise in nitrogen and
    sulfur effects on
  • Lichens
  • Soil chemistry
  • Vegetation
  • Water chemistry
  • Mycorrhizae
  • Diatoms
  • Deposition monitoring
  • Deposition modeling
  • Setting critical loads

3
4
Participants
  • NPS Science Staff
  • USFS
  • NWCAA
  • PSCAA
  • Ecology
  • Tribes

4
5
What is a Critical Load?
  • the quantitative estimate of an exposure to one
    or more pollutants below which significant
    harmful effects on specified sensitive elements
    of the environment do not occur according to
    present knowledge.

5
6
What is a Critical Load?
N Deposition (kg/ ha /yr)
Natural background N deposition
Changes in tree and soil chemistry
Change in alpine plant species
Change in algal species
Effects on aquatic and terrestrial biota
(episodic or chronic acidification)
Increased NO3 in lakes
6
7
Critical Loads in Action
  • Critical load work proceeding at Rocky Mountain
    NP
  • 1.5 kg N/ha/yr for eutrophication effects of
    alpine lakes
  • Current
  • deposition
  • is 3-4 kg
  • N/ha/yr
  • Partnering
  • with CDPHE
  • to identify
  • sources and
  • reduce
  • emissions

7
http//www.cdphe.state.co.us/ap/rmnp.html
8
Current Knowledge Deposition Monitoring
  • NADP Monitoring
  • S deposition declining
  • N deposition no trend
  • Between 1 and 2 kg/ha/yr
  • Does not include dry or occult deposition
  • All low elevation sites

8
9
Current Knowledge NADP N Deposition Monitoring
9
10
Current Knowledge N Deposition Monitoring
Research
  • Throughfall Monitoring
  • Low under canopy
  • Lichens absorbing N?
  • High in bulk
  • deposition
  • Inconsistent
  • with NADP or CG
  • Snowfall
  • Comparable to NADP

10
11
Current Knowledge Deposition Modeling Research
WSU CMAQ preliminary work based on 36 km grid
11
12
Current Knowledge Deposition Modeling Research
  • Modeling
  • Overpredicts dry
  • Underpredicts wet
  • No cloud
  • Limited sensitivity
  • analysis

12
13
Current Knowledge Ecological Effects
  • Lichens
  • Sensitive to air pollution
  • N sensitive lichens absent in areas of high
    nitrogen deposition
  • Preliminary work with Columbia Gorge throughfall
    monitoring data yields a CL of 2.4 kg/ha/yr
  • 2.0 dry deposition
  • 0.4 wet deposition

13
14
Current Knowledge Ecological Effects
  • Acidification effects
  • Nutrient effects of N expected to occur at lower
    deposition rates than acidification effects
  • MAGIC model yielded an upper bound CL of 10 kg
    S/ha/yr for acidification of Lake Eunice (Mt.
    Rainier)
  • (Recent documentation of episodic acidification
    at Lake Eunice due to snowmelt pulse)

14
15
Research Priorities
  • Aquatic Ecosystems
  • Mine existing water quality databases to
    identify
  • Areas which may already be affected by N or S
    deposition
  • Areas which may be sensitive to additional N
  • Establish CL for eutrophication of aquatic
    ecosystems using RMNP work as a model (diatoms)

15
16
Research Priorities
  • Terrestrial Ecosystems
  • Lichens
  • Collect lichens from NADP and throughfall
    sites
  • Refine deposition modeling and/or conduct
    additional monitoring to better establish a
    deposition gradient and/or use PRISM
  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
    soils mapping effort
  • Identify sensitive areas (N and Al)

16
17
Research Priorities
  • Terrestrial Ecosystems
  • Alpine meadows
  • Fertilization effects research using RMNP as
    model
  • Mycorrhizal diversity
  • Similar to lichens in terms of PNW ecological
    importance and diversity.

17
18
Not a Research Priority
  • Quantifying actual deposition
  • Adequate to index to NADP or other standard
    monitor

18
19
Questions?
19
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com